On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 09:38:02PM +, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Thursday, 26 December 2013 at 05:39:26 UTC, Lionello Lunesu
> wrote:
> >On 12/26/13, 11:58, bearophile wrote:
> >>Lionello Lunesu:
> >>
> >>>I could have sworn this used to work. Is my memory failing me, or
> >>>was this a del
On Thursday, 26 December 2013 at 05:39:26 UTC, Lionello Lunesu
wrote:
On 12/26/13, 11:58, bearophile wrote:
Lionello Lunesu:
I could have sworn this used to work. Is my memory failing
me, or was
this a deliberate change at some point? Perhaps a regression?
It's not a regression, it's a lock
On 12/26/13, bearophile wrote:
> You have to explain such things in the main D newsgroup. D.learn
> newsgroup is not fit for such requests.
There have already been a million of these threads, it's worth doing a
search as there's probably lots of answers there.
Lionello Lunesu:
Yeah, that's what I ended up doing. But D being D, the default
should be safe and correct.
I feel we could take this breaking change since it would not
silently change the code to do something else.
You have to explain such things in the main D newsgroup. D.learn
newsgroup
On 12/26/13, 11:58, bearophile wrote:
Lionello Lunesu:
I could have sworn this used to work. Is my memory failing me, or was
this a deliberate change at some point? Perhaps a regression?
It's not a regression, it's a locked-in design mistake. Write it like
this and try again:
foreach (dchar
Lionello Lunesu:
I could have sworn this used to work. Is my memory failing me,
or was this a deliberate change at some point? Perhaps a
regression?
It's not a regression, it's a locked-in design mistake. Write it
like this and try again:
foreach (dchar d; "你好")
Bye,
bearophile
