On Sunday, 3 January 2016 at 16:44:35 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
If it's a private internal data structure which is only used a
few places, then sure - just use the minimum code required to
get the job done.
But, if it's a part of the public API for a module and the
class logically has a natural o
On Sunday, 3 January 2016 at 16:25:31 UTC, Tobi G. wrote:
On Sunday, 3 January 2016 at 14:49:59 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
Anyway, it's not too hard if you understand what's going on,
and all of the functions I added are good things to have
anyway, because lots of generic code expects some or all of
On Sunday, 3 January 2016 at 14:49:59 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
On Sunday, 3 January 2016 at 10:55:05 UTC, AntonSotov wrote:
import std.container.rbtree;
class myClass {
string str;
}
int main()
{
auto tree = new RedBlackTree!myClass;
return 0;
}
Error: mutable method object.Object.
tsbockman,
Many thanks! Now I work for me
On Sunday, 3 January 2016 at 10:55:05 UTC, AntonSotov wrote:
import std.container.rbtree;
class myClass {
string str;
}
int main()
{
auto tree = new RedBlackTree!myClass;
return 0;
}
Error: mutable method object.Object.opCmp is not callable using
a inout object
Error: template i
On Sunday, January 03, 2016 10:55:05 AntonSotov via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> import std.container.rbtree;
>
> class myClass {
> string str;
> }
>
>
> int main()
> {
> auto tree = new RedBlackTree!myClass;
> return 0;
> }
>
>
> Error: mutable method object.Object.opCmp is not call
import std.container.rbtree;
class myClass {
string str;
}
int main()
{
auto tree = new RedBlackTree!myClass;
return 0;
}
Error: mutable method object.Object.opCmp is not callable using a
inout object
Error: template instance std.functional.binaryFun!("a < b", "a",
"b").binaryFu
