On Wednesday, 9 March 2016 at 20:30:44 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 March 2016 at 18:11:24 UTC, John wrote:
You can go with Algebraic. I used to do that in scheme-d. Then
I switched to a tagged union by hand to avoid a compiler
regression. Algebraic was OK.
2x speed
On Tuesday, 8 March 2016 at 18:11:24 UTC, John wrote:
* For this kind of implementation, is the Algebraic type a good
choice ? Is a simple union perhaps better ?
You can go with Algebraic. I used to do that in scheme-d. Then I
switched to a tagged union by hand to avoid a compiler
Hi,
I'm currently reading "Programming in D" and in order to get
accustomed to D and it's syntax, I've decided to implement
(actually port) a simple (and naive) Scheme interpreter from C to
D. The original interpreter (in C) is described in a series of
posts here:
