On Wednesday, 5 June 2013 at 09:02:44 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jun 2013 23:47:07 +0100, ixid
wrote:
On Monday, 3 June 2013 at 09:29:20 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2013 21:26:56 +0100, ixid
wrote:
We really don't want D to become a TMTOWTDI language.
Ideally there sh
On Tue, 04 Jun 2013 23:47:07 +0100, ixid wrote:
On Monday, 3 June 2013 at 09:29:20 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2013 21:26:56 +0100, ixid wrote:
We really don't want D to become a TMTOWTDI language. Ideally there
should be 1 right way and no alternatives. That way, anyone who
On Monday, 3 June 2013 at 09:29:20 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2013 21:26:56 +0100, ixid
wrote:
We really don't want D to become a TMTOWTDI language.
Ideally there should be 1 right way and no alternatives.
That way, anyone who knows D will have a greater chance of
knowing what
On Fri, 31 May 2013 21:26:56 +0100, ixid wrote:
We really don't want D to become a TMTOWTDI language. Ideally there
should be 1 right way and no alternatives. That way, anyone who knows
D will have a greater chance of knowing what any given code sample
does, and not have to look up alter
We really don't want D to become a TMTOWTDI language. Ideally
there should be 1 right way and no alternatives. That way,
anyone who knows D will have a greater chance of knowing what
any given code sample does, and not have to look up alternate
syntax etc.
R
Up to a point I'd certainly ag
On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 10:21:19 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
Until this thread I didn't even know they existed..
Same.
I use them every day in python, but I had no idea they were in C++
Tbh they annoy me in python, although that's just my C background
showing.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Minas Mina
wrote:
> They are more noisy for non-English talking persons.
Um and the rest of the D keywords are in what language?!
--
Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
Regan Heath:
I find them ugly and less clear - because I can glance at words
& symbols and immediately see the operator, faster than with
words and symbols.
Finding a short, common and easy to write English word "ugly" is
quite strange, especially for a person that seems able to write
in En
On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 16:48:33 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Shriramana Sharma:
Hello. I have always loved the readability of C++'s
and/or/not/xor
word-like logical operators but It doesn't seem to be
available in D.
and/or/not are less visually noisy, they look better than the
ugly &&/||/!
On Fri, 31 May 2013 02:41:14 +0100, Shriramana Sharma
wrote:
Thanks to all who replied.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:18 PM, bearophile
wrote:
But Walter refused them time ago on the basis that no one uses them in
C++.
So you can ask for them in the main D newsgroup, but I don't think yo
On Thu, 30 May 2013 18:57:37 +0100, ixid wrote:
On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 16:30:12 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 16:18:44 UTC, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
Hello. I have always loved the readability of C++'s and/or/not/xor
word-like logical operators but It doesn't seem to
Ali Çehreli:
I don't have a preference on the topic but it would still be
incomplete, right? There are many other operators that don't
have keywords.
Beside the && || ! I think it's much better to not replace the
other operators with keywords.
Perhaps that's why not many people use them.
Shriramana Sharma:
Um why really? "No one uses them in C++"? How come? I agree that
Walter has succesfully produced/marketed a C++ compiler for a
long
time, but really, "no one uses"?!!! I use, for one. And it does
tremendously increase the readability of a program. Otherwise
why
would there
On 05/30/2013 06:41 PM, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
> "no one uses"?!!! I use, for one.
Are there others in the team?
Without getting into the argument of whether they are useful, you are
the first person that I know who uses them. :) I have been programming
in C since 1988 and in C++ since 1997
Thanks to all who replied.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:18 PM, bearophile wrote:
>
> But Walter refused them time ago on the basis that no one uses them in C++.
> So you can ask for them in the main D newsgroup, but I don't think you will
> see them in D...
Um why really? "No one uses them in C++"
On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 16:18:44 UTC, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
Hello. I have always loved the readability of C++'s
and/or/not/xor
word-like logical operators but It doesn't seem to be available
in D.
Isn't this possible in D? I tried doing:
alias && and ;
import std.stdio ;
void main () {
On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 16:30:12 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 16:18:44 UTC, Shriramana Sharma
wrote:
Hello. I have always loved the readability of C++'s
and/or/not/xor
word-like logical operators but It doesn't seem to be
available in D.
Isn't this possible in D? I t
Shriramana Sharma:
Hello. I have always loved the readability of C++'s
and/or/not/xor
word-like logical operators but It doesn't seem to be available
in D.
and/or/not are less visually noisy, they look better than the
ugly &&/||/! of C/C++/D, and it's much less easy to write & when
you need
On 2013-05-30, 13:56, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
Hello. I have always loved the readability of C++'s and/or/not/xor
word-like logical operators but It doesn't seem to be available in D.
Isn't this possible in D? I tried doing:
alias && and ;
import std.stdio ;
void main () {
writeln ( tru
On Thursday, 30 May 2013 at 16:18:44 UTC, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
Hello. I have always loved the readability of C++'s
and/or/not/xor
word-like logical operators but It doesn't seem to be available
in D.
Isn't this possible in D? I tried doing:
No, it isn't available... Thank goodness! :)
Hello. I have always loved the readability of C++'s and/or/not/xor
word-like logical operators but It doesn't seem to be available in D.
Isn't this possible in D? I tried doing:
alias && and ;
import std.stdio ;
void main () {
writeln ( true and true ) ;
}
but I get errors:
$ dmd foo.d
f
21 matches
Mail list logo
