On Friday, 9 March 2018 at 14:41:47 UTC, J-S Caux wrote:
Going further, I'm really wondering what the plan is as far as
Complex is concerned. Right now it just feels neglected
(half-done/aborted transition from creal etc to Complex, lots
of missing basic functions etc), and is one major
On Friday, 9 March 2018 at 14:41:47 UTC, J-S Caux wrote:
Is this a case for a bug report? Seems pretty bizarre to do
that, like an oversight/neglect.
Yes if there's not one there for it already.
OK thanks. I looked at libmir, and saw many good things there.
I was wondering: is it still
On Friday, 9 March 2018 at 13:56:33 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
- I would expect the D `Complex!double` case to work faster
than the `real` one. Why is it the other way around? [I can
accept (and use) D with Complex!real running 1/3 the speed of
C++ (but with increased accuracy), but I'd also
On Friday, 9 March 2018 at 12:34:40 UTC, J-S Caux wrote:
Please bear with me, this is a long question!
To explain, I'm a scientist considering switching from C++ to
D, but before I do, I need to ensure that I can:
- achieve execution speeds comparable to C++ (for the same
accuracy; I can
Please bear with me, this is a long question!
To explain, I'm a scientist considering switching from C++ to D,
but before I do, I need to ensure that I can:
- achieve execution speeds comparable to C++ (for the same
accuracy; I can accept a slight slowdown, call it 30%, to get a
few more
