On Friday, 31 May 2019 at 08:35:23 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
With 1), 2) and 3) fixed, the code would look like this (only
changed code included):
unittest {
with (Dispatcher.X) {
A(1);
A("a");
B(2);
C_Q(3);
}
}
struct Dispatcher {
struct opDispatch(s
On Friday, 31 May 2019 at 08:35:23 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
On Friday, 31 May 2019 at 07:17:22 UTC, Amex wrote:
What I'm talking about is that if A would be dispatched to,
say, W!X where W handles the special dispatching by returning
X_A rather than X.A.
I don't know if D can do this kinda s
On Friday, 31 May 2019 at 07:17:22 UTC, Amex wrote:
What I'm talking about is that if A would be dispatched to,
say, W!X where W handles the special dispatching by returning
X_A rather than X.A.
I don't know if D can do this kinda stuff even though it would
be rather simple as it would depen
imo for parts of names such things will never appear.. names,
subnames, overloading.. hell no
but I want Kotlin lambdas
https://kotlinlang.org/docs/reference/lambdas.html
I want more:
Function literals with receiver
it: implicit name of a single parameter
Passing a lambda to the last parameter
t
with lets one remove a direct reference...
The problem is the things I want to access are not part of a
single object but have a common naming structure:
X_A
X_B
X_C_Q
(rather than X.A, X.B, X.C.Q)
it would be very helpful(since X is long) to be able to do
something like
with(X)
{
A;
