On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 21:35:19 +0100
"Simen kjaeraas" wrote:
> spir wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:44:24 -0500
> > bearophile wrote:
> >
> >> spir:
> >>
> >> > 1. name objects automatically
> >> > I need some objects to know their name (as field on themselves). the
> >> only solution I ca
spir wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:44:24 -0500
bearophile wrote:
spir:
> 1. name objects automatically
> I need some objects to know their name (as field on themselves). the
only solution I can else imagine is for the user write:
>x = ...;
>x.name = "x";
What if you have two or
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:44:24 -0500
bearophile wrote:
> spir:
>
> > 1. name objects automatically
> > I need some objects to know their name (as field on themselves). the only
> > solution I can else imagine is for the user write:
> > x = ...;
> > x.name = "x";
>
> What if you have two
spir:
> 1. name objects automatically
> I need some objects to know their name (as field on themselves). the only
> solution I can else imagine is for the user write:
> x = ...;
> x.name = "x";
What if you have two or more references to the same object?
Regarding your generic questi
Hello,
Is there a way to explore the current scope, meaning the set of currently
defined symbols?
(Equivalent of python's vars(), locals(), globals().)
I have 2 use cases for this:
1. name objects automatically
I need some objects to know their name (as field on themselves). the only
solution
