On Friday, 19 February 2016 at 14:26:25 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Try ub[0].length = 3. You are trying to change the length on
one of the static arrays.
yes, right these compile. I was surpised it wouldn't accept the
append with just an int.
int[1][][1] ubb;
On 2/19/16 8:53 AM, Jay Norwood wrote:
On Friday, 19 February 2016 at 07:59:29 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
.. Or you could do something really wonky like
auto arr = new int[][2][](5);
which would be a dynamic array of length 5 which holds static arrays
of length 2 which hold dynamic
On Friday, 19 February 2016 at 07:59:29 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
.. Or you could do something really wonky like
auto arr = new int[][2][](5);
which would be a dynamic array of length 5 which holds static
arrays of length 2 which hold dynamic arrays which are null.
In my case, int
On Friday, February 19, 2016 06:54:51 Jay Norwood via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Strange to me that this compiles, since I would expect there to
> be some C-like limitation on the position of the unspecified
> dimension. Is allowing this somehow useful?
>
> int[1][][1] ub;
> writeln("ub",ub);
Strange to me that this compiles, since I would expect there to
be some C-like limitation on the position of the unspecified
dimension. Is allowing this somehow useful?
int[1][][1] ub;
writeln("ub",ub);
