On 02-04-2012 07:32, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, April 02, 2012 07:23:23 Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 02-04-2012 06:25, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
alias this is not supposed to be restricted such that you can only have
one
per type. That's a temporary, implementation problem. TDPL
On Monday, April 02, 2012 09:37:04 Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 02-04-2012 07:32, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, April 02, 2012 07:23:23 Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 02-04-2012 06:25, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
alias this is not supposed to be restricted such that you can only have
one
On 31 March 2012 06:28, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
it also has
opDot, which is being removed from the language.
Out of curiosity, what was opDot?
--
James Miller
On 30-03-2012 19:28, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, March 30, 2012 16:27:44 simendsjo wrote:
Is opImplicitCastTo a planned feature?
It's only used in this type as I can see, and it doesn't add implicit
casting.
It's been discussed, but I don't think that it's ever been agreed upon. In
On Monday, April 02, 2012 05:41:00 Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 30-03-2012 19:28, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, March 30, 2012 16:27:44 simendsjo wrote:
Is opImplicitCastTo a planned feature?
It's only used in this type as I can see, and it doesn't add implicit
casting.
It's
On Monday, April 02, 2012 15:36:01 James Miller wrote:
On 31 March 2012 06:28, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
it also has
opDot, which is being removed from the language.
Out of curiosity, what was opDot?
An overload of the dot operator. So, if you had
A a = foo();
a.func();
On 02-04-2012 06:25, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, April 02, 2012 05:41:00 Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 30-03-2012 19:28, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, March 30, 2012 16:27:44 simendsjo wrote:
Is opImplicitCastTo a planned feature?
It's only used in this type as I can see, and it
On Monday, April 02, 2012 07:23:23 Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 02-04-2012 06:25, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
alias this is not supposed to be restricted such that you can only have
one
per type. That's a temporary, implementation problem. TDPL specifically
talks about having multiple alias
Is opImplicitCastTo a planned feature?
It's only used in this type as I can see, and it doesn't add implicit
casting.
On Friday, March 30, 2012 16:27:44 simendsjo wrote:
Is opImplicitCastTo a planned feature?
It's only used in this type as I can see, and it doesn't add implicit
casting.
It's been discussed, but I don't think that it's ever been agreed upon. In
theory, alias this is meant to deal with
10 matches
Mail list logo