OK Thanks info. I did work CY9SS on 30 mtr RTTY, but havent heard em on PSK
at all.
Between this expedition and former, I only need them on 10 meters, and then
on 160 SSB. Right now I hear them
on 160 cw, which have already got. That tone would run me nuts if I were
trying them now. Dont know w
Listening to CY9SS on 1.828 and there is a rough
sounding tone continually coming on to of him. Its 300 cy wide.
Three second tone, then about 5 seconds of silence, then tone then silence
etc. Anyone know what it is? Appears to be purposely QRMing the
CY9.
Danny
The K3UK DIGITAL MO
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Danny Douglas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK It was very loud here. Multiple tones up and down covering the 1kc
freq. I just hope we dont hear that taking over the digital bands.
Danny,
Most who are experimenting with Olivia are on 14.107.500 or 14.109.500
a
OK It was very loud here. Multiple tones up and down covering the 1kc freq.
I just hope we dont hear that taking over the digital bands.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.1/28 - Release Date: 6/24/2005
The K3UK DI
One can find more info at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oliviadata/
Check the "Links" menu for technical and other information on the mode.
73,
Jerry K0HZI
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Danny Douglas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> lISTEN TO 10.139 SOMETHING IS LIL OVER 1 KC WIDE AND ALMOST LIKE
mshf BUT ISNT.
Danny,
It appears to be "Olivia" mode but was not strong enough here to copy
who it was. MULTIPSK ver 3.8 has the Olivia mode or if
lISTEN TO 10.139 SOMETHING IS LIL OVER
1 KC WIDE AND ALMOST LIKE mshf BUT ISNT.
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "digitalradio" on the web.
To
--- Rick Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Something to consider is that if many radio amateurs
> are using low power or
> medium power and you chose to use much higher power,
> while it may be
> possible for them to print you, you will likely not
> be able to print them
> and the QSO will no
Something to consider is that if many radio amateurs are using low power or
medium power and you chose to use much higher power, while it may be
possible for them to print you, you will likely not be able to print them
and the QSO will not be able to continue if signals are that marginal.
I can se
Yep, I agree with Jose. Problems with signal width, noise and splatter
aren't usually due to operating high power, but rather because the audio
input to the rig is being overdriven from the soundcard. Until someone comes
up with an easy way to monitor the rf output at the sending station, this
10 matches
Mail list logo