Rick
I for one do not love the ARRL plan.. but it is an
improvement over the existing limitation on baud rates and mixing of data, voice
and image...and it is likely the best we are going to be able to get at this
time.
__Howard S.
Andy,
No response at 14:10 UTC
Ron W4LDE
obrienaj wrote:
Hmm, no connects today. I will reboot the software and also reboot
the router , please test.
Andy K3UK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Bill Aycock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy- I AM on 23-- I get a connected indication
-Thanks Ron, I just reset my router , will see if that makes any
difference. Everything else looks to be as it should.
Andy K3UK
-- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, W4LDE-Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy,
No response at 14:10 UTC
Ron W4LDE
obrienaj wrote:
Hmm, no connects today.
Hi,
I've been an engineer for a long time, but I'm new to ham radio. Where
exactly is this limitation defined by the FCC in the US? What document
(and maybe section) defines the limitation of 300 baud regardless of the
bandwidth?
Also: are you saying that the FCC allows us to transmit
At 09:33 AM 2/4/06, jgorman01 wrote:
1. I don't know why you say US hams cannot experiment on HF unless our
regs are changed. We currently have minimal bandwidth regulations.
Someone is certainly welcome to correct me, but I don't know of any HF
modem that tries to use 2 tones at 300 baud or
Keep in mind there is no regulatory baud rate limit for digital voice or
digital SSTV. Any emission designators with a second symbol of 1 or 2, and
a third symbol of E or C are considered Phone/Image respectively. There
are no baud limits for these emissions. The baud limits are for emission
Andy,
As of 12:15 pm EST today I still can't log
in to your telnet via my OE6 browser or in MixW v2.16. I have not been able to
log on to it since you moved it last month.
73,Thomas F. Giella, KN4LFLakeland,
FL, USAGrid Square EL97AW[EMAIL PROTECTED]
KN4LF Amateur SWL Radio History:
Artie...
You seem to be making my point...
Instead of being an engineer and concentrating on
developing DV technology.. (BTW good luck with your
experiments)
You first have to be a lawyer and attempt to
decipher arcane regulations to see if your experimentation might even be
legal...
I have been given a signalink sl-1+ interface with an 8pin cable. I am
using a kenwood ts-570 dge. Would i be right in thinking i would get
better results from using a 13 pin connector and using the acc-2
connection on the radio. At this moment in time i am using mixw and the
hrd radio
Michael,
Thank you for the elucidation. I am certainly no expert in all this!
Not uneducated, but not expert and easy to get confused between baud
and bit rate when trying to explain it.
Your consise explanation is appreciated.
Jim
WA0LYK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Michael Keane
Andy, I get nothing here on port 23 or 599. time
07:00 2/5/06
JoeW4JSI
Age is mind over matterIf you don't mind, it does not matter
- Original Message -
From:
Bill
Aycock
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 10:48
AM
Subject: Re:
11 matches
Mail list logo
