Howard,
If I read you right, since this is in paragraph (a), then paragraphs
(b) through (e) are subordinate to it. Your statements seem to say
that if emcomms require it, then the rest of the basis and purpose
paragraphs should take a back seat to emcomms.
Does 'self-policing' and the freedom
Anyone know of a soundcard program that would allow one to feed
signals to both stero inputs?This would allow an external
frequency standard to be used to adjust the soundcard calibration.
Thanks, Stan
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of
Yep, I just plain screwed up. I apologize to everyone on the list.
Mr. Bodson of the Roanoke Division seems to have shown exceptional judgement.
I would note that the vote was NOT unanimous. Do you know how YOUR Director
voted?
tim ab0wr
On Saturday 11 February 2006 00:24, Michael Keane
On Saturday 11 February 2006 00:35, Dr. Howard S. White wrote:
EMCOMM has always been the first reason for existence of HAM Radio.
Sec. 97.1 Basis and purpose
The rules and regulations in this part are designed to provide an
amateur radio service having a fundamental purpose as expressed
Read the 2nd Motion 29 again:
They voted Unanimously to have the theGeneral Counsel, Chief Technology Officer and
Executive VicePresident to file a petition"
So they were indeed showing good
judgement!
So Tim:
You are free to continue your ANTI-EVERYTHING
Rantings...
On Friday 10 February 2006 22:51, Dr. Howard S. White wrote:
We tried Part 15 many variations of 802.11 type solutions and they just
do not work ... Our terrain is far too mountainous and varied for reliable
line of sight..
Really? And you think 2m, 70cm, and higher bands are any less
I'm hoping someone in the group can help me with this little problem.
For months I have been using Digipan on 20 metres with an Icom 746,
and quite suddenly two days ago, I couldn't tune up properly with out
masses of ALC showing.
I use Quickmix to retain the soundcard settings, and the
Try APWGE. It uses both sound card
channels.
Dan N0ZIZ
- Original Message -
From:
Stan
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 8:03
AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Any X-Y Scope
software available
Anyone know of a soundcard program
Like many hams, I have been unsure of what direction would be best for
amateur radio when it comes to encryption. At one time I was swayed some
by the Winlink 2000 promoters that maybe this should be done, but after
serious consideration, the long term considerations make it problematic
to
When you say you have no problem with loading and tuning correctly, exactly
what process are you following? Do you have an antenna that is resonant on
all these frequencies? Are you using an autotuner between the 746 and the
antenna? It sounds like perhaps you have a problem causing a high SWR
Tim Gorman wrote:
No, we are not free do use encryption on amateur radio. That is for a good
reason. It is called self-policing.
remainder of posting snipped -
this section was included to keep a point of reference
As has already been pointed out, the subject is moot anyway, since the
NO to encryption, but of course they are not asking me.
As one who did provide encrypted communications to the US government for 30
years I know that so much junk flows thru that the operators of the equpment
dont bother to read it, or our heads would have burst. But we could! And
who in
Amateur radio can be very helpful in some emergency situations but I
strongly feel that trying to turn ham radio into a substitute for
commercial communications is a terrible move. If Red Cross or some
gov't agency wants commercial grade communications, that's their
problem.
Note the words
On Saturday 11 February 2006 12:24, Paul L Schmidt wrote:
In general, though, it seems that there are a lot of folks out there
who think it's best to penalize the entirety of society because a
small segment *MIGHT* do something wrong.
Not allowing encryption of messages on amateur radio
http://69.51.152.43/morse/
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion)
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To
ya know what? my patience is at an end with the
constant , long winded arguments which keep circling the drain.
FCC part 234159.4657? who really cares? ARRL
makes no difference to the rest of the world!!! we have figured it out, and
patiently waiting
for the USA to catch up.
Why
I should have clarified the subject line
- Original Message -
From: John Bradley
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 8:13 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ARRL to file Encryption Petition
with the FCC
ya know what? my patience is at an end
Hmmm, you have figured it out?
Do your regulations allow *you* to encrypt the content of any messages you
send over amateur radio? Do they allow you to encrypt the access protocols to
your systems?
How do you avoid the scrutiny of YOUR intelligence services when sending
encrypted messages
18 matches
Mail list logo
