Howard,
I'll just repeat what I said in my prior message to show how well you
read what people post and leave it at that.
Nobody minds you being a cheerleader, Howard, and I agree with
you that Winlink should be a tool in our arsenal, but when you
start throwing out such totally unbelievable
Andy,There are already organizations that provide such numbers. For example, the 070 club assigns numbers, has all sorts of awards, and contests for PSK. The Digital QSO Club assigns numbers for digital operators, etc. They do not have awards as such but more of an honor roll which is also open
It is interesting to note that those strongly opposing open
discussion here of the impact of remotely-invoked unattended
operation on digital mode stations are also those speaking strongly
in favor of the expanded use of remotely-invoked unattended
operation.
Its a bit late for the mushroom
Hello everyone,
The belief that in the United States of America amateur radio is
regarded like the USN, the USCG,the USAF etc.is pretty widespread
among the amateur radio fraternity. It would be interesting to know
how PSK and other digital modes blend into this service.
I believe it would be
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We don't attach the seriousness and intensity to
the hobby as do our American friends, perhaps we are too relaxed
with
this attitude. This is reflected in the civility which is shown to
all the users of 80 and 40 metres from
WELL SAID MEL. I'm standing next to you. Chris
G7OGX
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion)
Folks, please remember to avoid name calling while engaging in
debate. Today I have removed one member for doing that and suepended
another person. First time in almost six years that I have had to do
that. I like open discussion but please avoid name calling.
Andy K3Uk
Moderator.
I was unaware there was a DigiPol group.
It is my view that we should carry on such discussions
there, though reference to a post re. Amateur-digital
regs and policies may be made in a post here.
For Example:
~
I am considering MFSK13 and SSTV
Having tried several programs, I now use an ancient Pakratt PK-232
which I picked up on eBay for virtually nothing. The software has got
to be at least twenty years old and running on a CPU with less power
than most modern pocket calculators, but it still digs out signals
that the others miss
WinWarbler will provide more modern software support for your PK232,
Martin -- macros, logging, and an interface to the rest of the DXLab
Suite. If you're also interested in RTTY, WinWarbler will run your
PK232 and the MMTTY engine in parallel, yielding panoramic tuning
and diversity decoding.
He who tries to inflict political statements on amateur radio is a DAMN FOOL.
73,
Chuck, AA5J
At 02:26 PM 2/26/2006, you wrote:
Its because the ARRL has gone nuts, like Bush.
73 de WB4M
Buddy
Regards,
ChuckM mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
http://worldconnect.rootsweb.com/~clmayfield
A billion dollars? Wow!
That will increase the high volume level of the
discussions as to what is the best solution!
... doc
In addition to allocating spectrum to public safety, the law creates a
$1 billion grant program to pay for public-safety interoperable
communications systems, $156
Rick,
Respectfully, you might want to clue your EOC in on the SEDAN network and how
it works. Those folks have a lot of experience with tactical emcomm using
packet.
What impressed me the most is that they have known for a long time that
forwarded messages, e.g. email, are not conducive to
I know some folks have been working on the
SEDAN network here in Florida, am not sure
how successful they have been.
Can you direct me to a URL that describes
what you are doing there, please?
I am a fan of Linux and could dedicate an older
laptop and an older 2M rig to a packet/SEDAN
type
bty229065 wrote:
I am new to digital modes, well not totally as I did run a Creed 7B
over a 2m link in 1971/72. Now I want to use RTTY and maybe some other
data modes on HF using an FT1000MP MkV Field. I would like to use the
rear RTTY port on the radio and leave the mic plugged into the
Perhaps those who are in favor of RM-11306 took the wise advice not
to mail bomb the FCC with comments that all say the same thing.
There is only strength in numbers when that strength has a purpose. I
personally see no purpose in asking over 5,000 US hams who use local
or automatic control
I, for one, did respond direct to arrl, though no copy here to digital
radio. I agree. Also I think that the so called band plan for 160 stinks
anyway, and needs to be completely revised.
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Giella KN4LF [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: a RTTY COL eList [EMAIL
When the FCC solicited comments regarding the establishment of
remotely-invoked automatic operation via 97.221 back in 1995, there
were a total of 19 comments filed. The 972 comments filed for RM-
11306 represents a huge increase. My statistical samples show that
no less than 80% of all
At 09:33 PM 2/28/06, you wrote:
When the FCC solicited comments regarding the establishment of
remotely-invoked automatic operation via 97.221 back in 1995, there
were a total of 19 comments filed. The 972 comments filed for RM-
11306 represents a huge increase. My statistical samples show that
no
In my perspective, it doesnt matter how many do not physically vote in an
election, or by comment. Everyone who does NOT vote, has just voted for the
winning side of the election. Quite often the non-voters outnumber the
voters, and could have changed any election by voiting. Just look at our
20 matches
Mail list logo
