Good one John ; ).
Do you have any pictures of the
Aurora?
73 Tony KT2Q
- Original Message -
From:
John
Bradley
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 12:24
AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Is it me , or
propagation ?
you
you think you have problems? heck, up here, above
50degrees N Latitude, with the aurora doing it's thing, on days like
this
I have to go out and rake up all the RF lying on
the snow under my antenna.I re-cycle it as FRS
signals..
John
- Original Message -
From:
Andrew,
There was a cornal hole disturbance that made it's way to us on the 18th.
Magnetic storm conditions since then.
See http://www.n3kl.org/sun/noaa.html
73 Tony KT2Q
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 5:18 PM
Subje
Hello Andy,
My Shreveport Amateur Radio group meets
in the public library here in town. Most semi-large cities have a decent
library and many have modern multi-media capabilities in their meeting rooms.
You might get lucky and see if your group might meet you there at whatever t
--- jhaynesatalumni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The number of developers of soundcard RTTY software
> is pretty
> small, so I think it's reasonable to ask them to
> make software
> interoperable with a mechanical TTY. K6STI was
> concerned
> about this with his RITTY program and worked out
>
Hi
Andrew
Poor propagation may
be the problem not you. I am located in West Michigan USA, and have had some
days where I cannot hear WWV on any frequency. Add that to local noise problems,
and somedays I just find something else to do rather than play
radio.
I do have a question
for
I'm sitting on the side, laughing my *** off, about this whole RTTY
story. On the one hand, a user of a FREE program is insisting that the
reply he gets is inadequate; while calling for adherence to a
"Standard" that does not exist. The RTTY standard seems to be 'Do it
yourself", but some simp
I know the feeling...but the bands have been tough today...gl with the new
ant...de russ wa3frp k
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.co
S-6 here. noise is S-5
At 04:18 PM 3/20/06, you wrote:
>At this time yesterday (20:00 UTC). I stuck up a new 20M antenna, my
>15MHz reading on WWV went from an S6 to 10 over 9. Today WWV on 15
>MHz is not even audible.
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other
At this time yesterday (20:00 UTC). I stuck up a new 20M antenna, my
15MHz reading on WWV went from an S6 to 10 over 9. Today WWV on 15
MHz is not even audible.
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://group
Bonnie, I was NOT able to see/hear N6IZ,
Andy.
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "expeditionradio"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the report, Andy.
> It looks like you had a good ALE copy on me for BER 17 and SN 05.
> That sequence was just as the texting part of the QSO ended.
>
Andy
I did copy you last night for a bit.
The noise level here was about S-6.
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band pl
The number of developers of soundcard RTTY software is pretty
small, so I think it's reasonable to ask them to make software
interoperable with a mechanical TTY. K6STI was concerned
about this with his RITTY program and worked out end-of-line
processing that is satisfactory. W1HKJ has just done
Soundcard software that does not automatically insert a CR-LF
sequence after sending 72 characters is no less compatible with
the "RTTY standard" John cites than are his mechanical teleprinters.
If I'm using a mechanical teleprinter in a RTTY QSO and I type more
than 72 characters, does the tel
John Becker wrote:
> At 11:37 PM 3/18/06, you wrote:
>
>
>>Rather than expect everyone else to compensate for your equipment's
>>limitations, why don't you design and build a circuit that counts
>>incoming characters and inserts a CR/LF after receiving 72. Doing
>>this with something programmable
At 11:37 PM 3/18/06, you wrote:
>Rather than expect everyone else to compensate for your equipment's
>limitations, why don't you design and build a circuit that counts
>incoming characters and inserts a CR/LF after receiving 72. Doing
>this with something programmable like a Basic Stamp would be a
Thanks for the report, Andy.
It looks like you had a good ALE copy on me for BER 17 and SN 05.
That sequence was just as the texting part of the QSO ended.
Could you see N6IZ also?
Bonnie Kq6XA
> Andy K3UK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep,
>
> [RX][CH 15][START OF NORMAL FRAME]
> [RESUME SCAN]
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
