[digitalradio] Re: FCC error? Conflict sub-bands in new rules? 3620kHz to 3635kHz

2006-10-13 Thread Dave Bernstein
If a conversion to bandwidth-based rules is imminent, why would the FCC role out these changes? 73, Dave, AA6YQ --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FCC error? 3620kHz to 3635kHz Automatic Band -vs- Extra Voice Is there a sub-band

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Digital Voice: Some thoughts a fter one week.

2006-10-13 Thread Rein Couperus
I a working on such a scheme for PSKmail, with tables of 32k standard words (1 for each language), each word huffman coded as 2-3 bytes for downloading mail over a 100 Hz link. Experiments have shown that this is the maximum compression which can be accomplished. 73, Rein PA0R By the way,

RE: [digitalradio] WinDRM and new USA rules?

2006-10-13 Thread John Gleichweit
It's a FAX... ;@) -- John Smokey Behr Gleichweit FF1/EMT, CCNA, MCSE IPN-CAL023 N6FOG UP Fresno Sub MP183.5 ECV1852 List Owner x6, Moderator x4 CA-OES 51-507 http://smokeybehr.blogspot.com http://www.myspace.com/smokeybehr -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com

RE: [digitalradio] WinDRM and new USA rules?

2006-10-13 Thread DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA
Mark, If I use uuencode/uudecode on an image, then it becomes ASCII data. Would that be permissable to be sent on the RTTY/Data portion of a band? Walt/K5YFW -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 10:13 PM To:

Re: [digitalradio] Revised FCC rules for data/image communication

2006-10-13 Thread KV9U
Good point, Joe, on 160 not being an HF frequency band. Although most of us do tend to lump it in with the other HF frequencies. The change on 80 meters I bet is almost shocking to ARRL since I can not imagine that they would have wanted the competition to many of the traffic nets that operate

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Digital Voice: Some thoughts after one week.

2006-10-13 Thread Leigh L Klotz, Jr.
I think in addition to one table per language you will also need different tables for 75m than for 20m., hihi. Leigh/WA5ZNU On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 1:15 am, Rein Couperus wrote: I a working on such a scheme for PSKmail, with tables of 32k standard words (1 for each language), Need a Digital

Re: [digitalradio] WinDRM and new USA rules?

2006-10-13 Thread KV9U
Many years ago, Peter, TY1PS sent a compressed audio file from Benin to the USA and it could have been the first digital file of this type. This was done on Clover II since for a short time this was a popular digital mode with the Winlink system (not the same as the internet/ham radio

Re: [digitalradio] WinDRM and new USA rules?

2006-10-13 Thread Danny Douglas
I need a new ALINCO (or somebodies) Operating Priviliges chart. This is all too confusing. I went and got my Extra decades ago so I wouldnt have to remember (or care) about all this stuff. Danny Douglas N7DC ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB all DX 2-6 years each.

[digitalradio] Re: RTTY Shift

2006-10-13 Thread jhaynesatalumni
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 09:38 PM 10/12/2006, you wrote in part: I'm just wondering why we don't see more use of 85 or some other narrower shift in amateur use. I think that is because there is still a lot of non computer RTTY

[digitalradio] K0PFX / KT2Q DV 14236.0 1700z (Oct 13)

2006-10-13 Thread Tony
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web,

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Kantronics, Kam XL

2006-10-13 Thread Patrick Lindecker
Hello Ken, These modes (PAX/PAX2) have a protocol close to AX25 (between AX25 and Pactor 1), with a modulation close to Olivia and closer to Contestia. The modulation is described on my help (RX/TX modes selection and their descriptions) and the protocol (in french) is downloadble from

[digitalradio] QRV Digital Voice 14236.0

2006-10-13 Thread Tony
All: QRV WinDRM 14236.0 0030z (Oct 14). WinDRM finder : http://n1su.com/windrm_online.html Tony KT2Q Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol:

Re: [digitalradio] Re: The Rules are a changing!!! FCC publishes it changes

2006-10-13 Thread John Champa
Oh, I thought this was the big unibus, or whatever! (HI) John - K8OCL From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: The Rules are a changing!!! FCC publishes it changes Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 23:27:28 -0500 On

[digitalradio] Re: The Rules are a changing!!! FCC publishes it changes

2006-10-13 Thread Dave Bernstein
The Unibus? There's a DEC-defying trip down memory lane. As for the ARRL and FCC, they're off singing We're all Bozos on this Omnibus. 73, Dave, AA6YQ --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh, I thought this was the big unibus, or whatever!

Re: [digitalradio] Re: The Rules are a changing!!! FCC publishes it changes

2006-10-13 Thread Leigh L Klotz, Jr.
I think we're all bozos on this Q-bus. 73, Leigh/WA5ZNU On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 9:27 pm, Dave Bernstein wrote: The Unibus? There's a DEC-defying trip down memory lane. As for the ARRL and FCC, they're off singing We're all Bozos on this Omnibus. Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to