[digitalradio] Re: FCC Corrects J2D 500Hz Bandwidth Error

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Meaning no offense, but I would say that it is you that is proven wrong. You have been stating that the regulations as recently promulgated (not after the corrections that we are now promised) made Pactor

[digitalradio] JNOS on HF was: Q15X25 on HF

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Joe Veldhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For awhile I was thinking of adding an HF port to my JNOS BBS using it, but ultimately decided not to. Anyway, I would be willing to give it a shot sometime. -Joe, N8FQ right now you can also use pactor and clover

[digitalradio] FCC to restrict BW of digital modes?

Folks, Given the recent discussion in the USA about restriction of audio subcarrier generated digital modes (i.e. most of them!) to 500Hz bandwidth, perhaps now is the time to remind you about - DominoEX DominoEX DominoEX DominoEX Yes, this super mode, which has all the advantages

[digitalradio] MFSK beacon

Well, I'm getting out of this list, nobody seems to be interested by my experiments. Ciao, F4EOB.

[digitalradio] Moderator note

The FCC's intent to correct their error was important news and the posting of this information was certainly warranted. However, please keep in mind that we curtailed the debate on the FCC's intent. We should try to avoid having that debate morph in to a debate about whether certain parties

[digitalradio] New Year Digital Contest: IDEAS ???

Any interest in a digital contest held on New Year's Day? Here's the idea Stations work as many other stations as possible. Exchange is your LOCAL TIME , local date. and name of your local time zone. Points 10 points for any QSO ivolving two years (one station is in 2006 and the otehr

Re: [digitalradio] MFSK beacon

yo! I will listen after your beacon if you are turning your antenna to the north. 73 de LA5VNA Steinar Alves wrote: Well, I'm getting out of this list, nobody seems to be interested by my experiments. Ciao, F4EOB.

RE: [digitalradio] New Year Digital Contest: IDEAS ???

and critique it, input welcome. Will refine after feedback is received Andy K3UK. Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Yahoo! Groups Links __ NOD32 1881 (20061124) Information __ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http

Re: [digitalradio] FCC to restrict BW of digital modes?

I have tried to get some interest with DominoEX11 and DominoEX11/FEC by calling CQ with Multipsk and RS ID turned on. Not much response so far. As I have mentioned in the past, the basic 11 baud DominoEX mode did not seem to perform quite as well as MFSK16 which I generally consider to be the

Re: [digitalradio] New Year Digital Contest: IDEAS ???

On Nov 24, 2006, at 09:56, Andrew O'Brien wrote: Any interest in a digital contest held on New Year's Day? Here's the idea... Just a reminder, there is a Digital Voice Contest this December 29th and 30th for a Free AOR ARD9800 fast radio modem (a $550.00+ Value) as part of the ARRL

Re: [digitalradio] MFSK beacon

Here, if the people gets home after the band is closed to Europe, there is no chance to report anything at all. I would advice to take it easy and let a weekend pass, at least... Jose, CO2JA MSc.Jose Angel Amador Fundora Departamento de Telecomunicaciones Facultad de Ingenieria Electrica,

Re: [digitalradio] MFSK beacon

Alves, That is a shame, as I, like many, are monitoring your progress. Have you considered running an omni antenna and increasing output power - then you will not be limiting yourself to listeners in some particular direction, whilst still keeping radiated power in any direction the same, thus

Re: [digitalradio] MFSK beacon

Hello Alves, The QRPP experiments are very interesting. It is perhaps just a bit difficult to hear you signal from over the pond due to the bad conditions (here in Paris I did not hear your signal but I have nor a good antenna nor a good location...). A beacon is particurarly interesting for

[digitalradio] Re: FCC to restrict BW of digital modes?

Hello Rick, I have played with DominoEX and DominoEX/FEC a fair amount. It is difficult to do mode-to-mode comparisons at times but I find DominoEX/FEC to be a very good mode for tuning/sensitivity/robustness (if that is a word) and bandwidth. It seems do do quite well on 80 meters where I

Re: [digitalradio] MFSK 16 Beacon

HI Alves, I am listening for you here in VK. I have my radio on 14.293 USB with an indicated waterfall frequency of 1000 hz - so hopefully that is where you are putting your RF. Software is fldigi 1.01 (now out of beta) in mfsk16 mode. I don't have windows on my hf computer so can't run any of

Re: [digitalradio] MFSK beacon

some of us, non-US hams who do not need to argue all the time, have gone listening for you. Just like in real life, there sometimes is a lot of QRM to copy through. Don't QSY yet John VE5MU - Original Message - From: Alves To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday,

[digitalradio] Skysweep at 28.8K VHF/UHF?

Has any used http://www.skysweep.com/ on the VHF/UHF side? They claim 28.8K using their OFDM using a standard radio with no modifications. Anyone using it? Thanks! Steve N0FPF

Re: [digitalradio] New Year Digital Contest: IDEAS ???

Andrew, Your exchange format sounds great - and easy to score just by examing the logs. As for mode, do you take the stance of using the mode that everyone is farmiliar with and has software for - which is rtty or psk31 - or do we go for the slowest, most FEC, most DXish mode? I think that