Anyone...Anyone...I'm reposting this just in case someone missed it.
Getting desprate. Don't laugh but I'm running windows 98, MixW
RigExpert USB, and trying to run ACLog and have it control a Icom725.
WHEW. MixW runs well both mode and cat control. What is the secret for
ACLog's setup using t
Propagation...
Maybe the mountains in northern Georgia ?
>From: "jhaynesatalumni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [digitalradio] An observation on Olivia
>Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 03:22:58 -
>
>Right now I'm copying a QS
You could ask Scott, N3FJP if nothing else works. He has a reflector.
Charles, K0CW
mixw216 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone...Anyone...I'm reposting this just in case someone missed it.
Getting desprate. Don't laugh but I'm running windows 98, MixW
RigExpert USB, and trying to
When the 80 meter band goes long you may be far enough from the FL
station so that you can copy OK, but too close to the GA station.
If the signal strength was about the same from both stations, then there
could be ionospheric conditions that may be affecting the GA signal.
Olivia is generally
I have a somewhat similar rig to yours ... Icom 756 Pro II,
RigExpert/MixW, ACLog 3.0, laptop with USB and USB hub. I made a
switchbox with DPDT switch inside to switch the Icom computer control
output between the RigExpert and a serial-to-USB converter running to
the USB hub and then to the lapto
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "expeditionradio"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you tuned so that the phase scope is centered?
> What software are you using, and how do you have the threshold
> (squelch) set, and the allowable frequency drift?
>
> Bonnie VR2/KQ6XA
> Hong Kong, etc.
>
The
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KV9U <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the signal strength was about the same from both stations, then
there
> could be ionospheric conditions that may be affecting the GA signal.
> Olivia is generally pretty resistant to most interference and the
16/500
> mod
Multipath (ISI) or doppler can create such a mess...
I have seen the same on 40 already
Jose, CO2JA
-- Original Message --
From: "jhaynesatalumni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 17:32:28 -
>---
Multipath (ISI) or doppler can create such a mess...
I have seen the same on 40 already
Jose, CO2JA
-- Original Message --
From: "jhaynesatalumni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 17:32:28 -
>---
There is a standard used in instrumentation stuffsort of autovolt
on DC. Those devices work on anything from 10 to 30 volts, so it covers
at least
12.0, 13.8, 24 and 28 volts.
Those devices are NOT inexpensive, and maybe a manufacturer would think
a lot
to add some regulator inside the two
Living in Europe, Africa, Near East and Asia I often saw even large items
like sewing machines which could be plugged into anything from 90-260 Volts.
I had TVs, vaccumns etc. in the house that we brught back here, and they all
worked well. But, with small wall-warts, they didnt seem to make them
My father had a Hallicrafters HT-9 that did FMbut he never used it
on FM as long as
I remember. That line came to the market after WW II, if I remember well.
He sold his Hallicrafters transmitter in 1961 or so...Johnson HF
transmitters did not have
any measure of FM emissions.
Maybe some
Hello Bill,
According to the Multipsk help, it is -5 dB for the 125 bauds (which is logic
for this speed).
But -5 dB with a gaussian noise (fix statistical characteristics).
73
Patrick
"
BPSK125 and QPSK125
Creation: in 2003
Description :
Baud rate : 125
Speed : 148 wpm in capital letters
Hello Rick,
1200 bauds is equivalent to 1200 bits/sec as there is 1bit/symbol.
1 letter is worth 8 bits.
So in one second, you transmit 1200/8= 150 letters
In one minute you transmit: 150*60 or in words: 150*60/6=1500. But as there is
an overhead due to adress... 1320 is more realistic.
73
Pa
> jhaynesatalumni wrote:
> Right now I'm copying a QSO where the stations are using Olivia
> 16/500 on 80M. I'm in NW Arkansas, and the two stations in the QSO
> are in Florida and Georgia. I'm getting solid copy on the Florida
> station and extremely lousy copy on the Georgia station.
> (Presu
2007 Vermont QSO Party
Vermont QSO Party--CW/Phone/Digital, sponsored by the Central Vermont
Amateur Radio Club from Z Feb 3 - 2400Z Feb 5.
Frequencies (MHz): 160-10 meters and VHF/UHF; CW 40 kHz from band
edge (20 kHz Novice/Tech segments), Phone --lowest 25 kHz of General
segment and ent
Minnesota QSO Party Rules
9th Annual Minnesota QSO Party
Saturday, February 03, 2007
1400-2400 UTC (8AM-6PM CST)
2007 Changes and Additions
Awards added for top Minnesota Phone Only winner
Awards added for state / province winners
Contest Rules:
Time: Contest runs from 1400 until 2400 UTC (8
**New Rules for 2007**
Comments and suggestions are welcome at QSOParty[at]fsarc[dot]org.
1. Objectives
(A) Non-Delaware stations to contact as many Delaware stations as possible.
(B) Delaware stations to contact as many stations as possible.
2. Date & Contest Periods
Always the first ful
FEDERACION MEXICANA DE RADIOEXPERIMENTADORES, A. C. «F.M.R.E.»
2007 - MEXICO RTTY INTERNATIONAL CONTEST
RULES
1.- OBJECT: Contact and exchange QSO information with as many stations
as possible. Any station may work any other station. The call will be
CQ XE TEST or CQ MEXICO TEST.
2.- CONTEST
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "jhaynesatalumni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm reporting it just as
> a matter of interest, that here was one set of conditions that Olivia
> didn't handle well.
>
Actually, you haven't given enough information for it to be useful as
a report of conditions.
Fo
Were it 20 or 15 it could be that he was copying
GA via long path -- now that would mess with the
signal even if it were the same signal strength!
I remember a 15 or 20M QSO on a vertical at the old Club
station and the guy said "Talk for a couple of minutes,
I want to try something."
When he cam
21 matches
Mail list logo
