Dan,
Sorry to hear you're not having any luck. I'm not exactly local...
being on the other side of the Olympics and Puget Sound from you, but
I'd be happy to help.
I've got a SL1+ hooked up to my 706MkIIG, and have used it with a
variety of software to make contacts. It's worked great for me
Hi all. Dan here KD7UFF in Forks, WA I have a Tigertronics SL1+ I have
it set up right (I think) But I have only had another call sign show up
once when I used it on JT65A & I have not even tried anything else yet.
I am about to give up and sell this thing. So if anyone near me feels
like givin
In order to use a software version of Amtor, you would need to switch to
Linux OS. From what I have read, however, it is not very effective
compared to a dedicated box. Amtor had its day, and I operated it with
several different types of boxes, but it is fairly slow and can not work
into the no
If you are operating AFSK, or have a low end rig that does not do FSK
RTTY, then you would need to calculate the numbers as you suggest. Most
rigs that are set up for FSK RTTY will read out on the RTTY Mark
Frequency, but some will read out on Space, so it does vary between rig
designs. Since t
Since I dont use either Pactor or Amtor, I couldnt really recommend any
software for either, except I do know that MixW shows both a Pactor and
Amtor as well as 16 other modes. But, I believe those two are for receive
only. Someone on here may know otherwise and would ask them to chime in
here.
At 07:48 PM 5/28/2007, you wrote:
>That what I say John. You cant follow my recommendation, because you dont
>use a waterfall.
Danny your recommendation was to get DXLABS. I have no use for it.
As I said I have RTTY covered very well. The other modes you said that
it will do ( CW PSK) - I don't
That what I say John. You cant follow my recommendation, because you dont
use a waterfall. I havent used straight rtty in so long, and never really
used it on the ham bands so dont know how you would do that. Unless there
is a way you can easily put on a spot note, saying it IS a rig readout, an
That's fine Danny but I'll say it once again just for you -
I have no waterfall when I operate RTTY or software
or computer or can click on anything. But I can do the math
from the dial frequence to spot a mark dial frequency if that
would make you happy. Maybe you can click on that.
At 06:29 P
Hi Larry:
> Where can I get a copy of that program? Larry
> ve3fxq
I can send it to you if you like (400kb) or you
can download it here:
http://www.qsl.net/w8wn/hscw/msdsp.html
Tony KT2Q
I guess it comes down to the majority of us not working Hell, or M63. There
may be a lot that do, but I hardly if ever see a spot on those modes. As to
RTTY, I have 227 countries, and also 135 on PSK. The majority of spots on
RTTY are almost spot on, and I am guessing that what I see on the spo
At 09:45 AM 5/28/2007, you wrote:
>What is all comes down to is the fact that if EVERY op spots the freq, as
>seen on the waterfall, then there would be no question about where the
>station spotted actually is.
This may be very true Danny but I can only spot dial or a mark
frequency on 3 of the 5
Where can I get a copy of that program?..
Larry ve3fxq
- Original Message -
From: "Jose A. Amador" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 3:16 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: HSCW Bandwidth?
>
> Tony,
>
> You could use any program that uses a spectrum display.
>
> Among
Tony,
You could use any program that uses a spectrum display.
Among the serious ones, Spectran comes to my mind.
It is free and quite good.
73,
Jose, CO2JA
Tony wrote:
>> What speed do you have in mind?
>
> 1000 to 1500 letters per minute; 200 to 300 wors per minute.
>
>> The word PA
> What speed do you have in mind?
1000 to 1500 letters per minute; 200 to 300 wors
per minute.
>The word PARIS used as a standard for measuring
>words per minute contains
> 50 code elements so one word per second, 60wpm,
> is 50 baud.
Right; the 'standard' formula; BW = 4 x wpm,
(e.g., 200wp
I guess a better way to put it would be 10.141 MHz USB.
PhilW de KA1GMN
Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- In
digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Phil Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I will be on 30 meters PSK31 @ 10.140 + 1000Hz from to 0
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does anyone know the approximate bandwidth for
> injected audio tone high speed CW? Is there a way
> to calculate this?
>
What speed do you have in mind? The word PARIS used
as a standard for measuring words per minute co
What is all comes down to is the fact that if EVERY op spots the freq, as
seen on the waterfall, then there would be no question about where the
station spotted actually is. Every software package that I have used for
digital ops has worked the same way. If you spot 14.0713567 or whatever,
and I
Hello,
I'm interested in trying out digital voice and looking to buy one of the AOR
digital voice boxes. Please email me if you have one for sale, with the
model, condition and price shipped to 75080.
73 Saad N5FF.
Paul,
When you are on CW, many rigs will have an offset. I have an Argonaut V,
and, as you noted, you can set the offset tone for your preference. That
way you are zero beat with the other station and yet you can adjust your
sidetone to what works best for you.
With RTTY, the frequency specifi
Hi Paul,
Most software will sync with the incoming system and this will compensate
for any errors in the soundcard clock. Modern cards such as the SoundBlaster
Live should not really need adjusting, to be honest I would forget about
this with your card.
Re: 24-bit - again most software only us
20 matches
Mail list logo