[digitalradio] Re: JNOS can now interface with MultiPSK ...

2009-03-04 Thread maiko4
Hi Andy, > Very interesting. Full JNOS applications , nodes, BBS ?? Yes. The new 'psk' port is just another AX25 interface as far as JNOS is concerned. From a user point of view, the port looks no different than a kiss attached TNC (attach asy) or an AXUDP/AXIP interface. Maiko

[digitalradio] Re: ALE digital activity

2009-03-04 Thread Dave Bernstein
>>>AA6YQ comments below --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien wrote: Again, this would substantiate Dave AA6YQ's statement a year or so ago, that almost all digital mode users on HF are PSK and RTTY active, and that other digital are so under utilized that their presence illustrat

[digitalradio] Re: JNOS can now interface with MultiPSK ...

2009-03-04 Thread Andrew O'Brien
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "maiko4" wrote: > > Greetings, > > JNOS 2.0 is now able to use MultiPSK (by F6CTE) as a digital modem. > > * It does this by connecting to it over tcp/ip. > > For complete details and instructions, visit the link below : > >http://www.langelaar.net/proj

[digitalradio] ALE digital activity

2009-03-04 Thread Andy obrien
The link at http://hflink.net/ can give you an idea. It is fair to say that activity has improved a lot , mostly due to hard work by Bonnie who has made the documentation for getting ALE active MUCH better, and some seriously good innovations including Winlink connections and SMS message capabili

[digitalradio] Re: ALE musings

2009-03-04 Thread Andrew O'Brien
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "jhaynesatalumni" wrote: > > > Perhaps the best answer to your question may > > be in the form of questions for you: > > Why is "CQ Contest" needed? > > Why is "You are 5-9" needed? > > Why is a repeater needed? > > Why is a weekly net needed? > > > > The pu

[digitalradio] JNOS can now interface with MultiPSK ...

2009-03-04 Thread maiko4
Greetings, JNOS 2.0 is now able to use MultiPSK (by F6CTE) as a digital modem. * It does this by connecting to it over tcp/ip. For complete details and instructions, visit the link below : http://www.langelaar.net/projects/jnos2/multipsk This is a prototype - expect bugs. Feedback is more t

[digitalradio] Re: ALE musings

2009-03-04 Thread jhaynesatalumni
Rats! I just hit the wrong key and sent an unintended message. Wish I could delete it. And before that I had written a lengthy comment which Yahoo seems to have lost. So I'll try again. Seems like there are several aspects to ALE One is the notion of going through a list of frequencies in hope

Re: [digitalradio] Pactor scanning ?

2009-03-04 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
Posted on the pactor_packet list as well as direct to you. John

Re: [digitalradio] Pactor scanning ?

2009-03-04 Thread W6IDS
Hey, John... I think it was you that sent me a list of frequencies. I lost them. I've been working to make Windows Live Mail dedicated for Winlink/PacklinkW and had a little operator error in keeping it off the internet. So, it picked up your messages and when I removed the account for

[digitalradio] Re: ALE musings

2009-03-04 Thread jhaynesatalumni
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "expeditionradio" wrote: > > > Andy K3UK wrote: > > Bonnie, I have no doubts about automatic > > link establishment. It seems like a most > > logical method of establishing communications. > > I added the rather provocative end to my > > earlier post

[digitalradio] Re: Some More Thoughts On WINMOR and Winlink

2009-03-04 Thread Dave Bernstein
None of those 1500 QSOs were made with ALE, Skip. Most of them were made within a 2-week interval. 73, Dave, AA6YQ --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "kh6ty" wrote: > > > I made more than 1500 QSOs last month. --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, > > "expeditionradio" wrote:

[digitalradio] Re: ALE musings

2009-03-04 Thread expeditionradio
> Andy K3UK wrote: > Bonnie, I have no doubts about automatic > link establishment. It seems like a most > logical method of establishing communications. > I added the rather provocative end to my > earlier post because I am not sure WHY ALE, > in its present amateur radio configuration,

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Some More Thoughts On WINMOR and Winlink

2009-03-04 Thread Rick W
I concur with Graham on this. As a long time digital operator since I got back into ham radio in 1980 (first licensed in 1963), I quickly gravitated to HF and VHF RTTY (before VHF packet). I was one of the earliest adopters of Amtor and later Clover II for a short time. Because of my disastrous

[digitalradio] Re: Some More Thoughts On WINMOR and Winlink

2009-03-04 Thread hteller
> I made more than 1500 QSOs last month. --- In > digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "expeditionradio" > wrote: I forgot to mention that once when I was young and single, I was a victim of an alien abduction... Fortunately, it was a female alien! That is something one never forgets! ;-) 73, Ski

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Some More Thoughts On WINMOR and Winlink

2009-03-04 Thread Rick W
In the grand scheme of things, the old MIL-STD-188-141A form that we can legally use is very rare other than one group that sends out HF beacons. I had hoped at one time that we could use this for public service/emergency use but being one of the very few hams worldwide who actually tried to us

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Some More Thoughts On WINMOR and Winlink

2009-03-04 Thread kh6ty
> I made more than 1500 QSOs last month. --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, > "expeditionradio" wrote: 50 QSO's per day, for each of 30 days? Is there a daily ALE contest going on we do not know about? Wow! That is just unbelievable! At a mere 10 minutes per "QSO", that is 500 minutes, or

[digitalradio] Re: Some More Thoughts On WINMOR and Winlink

2009-03-04 Thread Dave Bernstein
Please explain how "trying it" would reveal how many amateur QSOs are typically made each month. 73, Dave, AA6YQ I made more than 1500 QSOs last month. --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "expeditionradio" wrote: > > > Dave, AA6YQ wrote: > > Anyone know how many amateur QSOs