Re: [digitalradio] Re: About the Becker TNCs.... I am confused

At 10:31 AM 9/7/2010, you wrote: >There was a set of e-prom up grades was added >.. my pk232 is one issue short of the final build .. pactor-2 , may be >packtor-3 was in the final prom , Nobody but SCS has P3. > I know I had to add a daughter board to mod it to the pk232-mbx .

Re: [digitalradio] About the Becker TNCs.... I am confused

Sorry for the confusion. I had 2 TNC's up for sale. ONE of each. I mention the wrong one here.. Again sorry. John, W0JAB At 02:04 PM 9/5/2010, you wrote: >John Becker wrote: >> Sorry Dan your about one mouse click to late. >> I already gave it away to a good home. >&

Re: [digitalradio] Re: HF packet still being used ???

Sorry Dave it's gone. At 08:43 AM 9/5/2010, you wrote: >> But my 2nd SCS TNC with pactor 3 is still up on the selling block. > >Hmm. How much? > >You may email direct if you don't want to discuss price here. > >73 de Dave, NF2G

[digitalradio] 2nd SCS TNC is gone.

I found a home for it. Tnx all.

Re: [digitalradio] HF packet still being used ???

Sorry Dan your about one mouse click to late. I already gave it away to a good home. But my 2nd SCS TNC with pactor 3 is still up on the selling block. No longer need it since I pulled all the stuff out of the pick up truck. (see QRZ dot com profile photo) John, W0JAB At 10:57 AM 9/4/2010

[digitalradio] HF packet still being used ???

I have been listening to the HF bands for packet over the last few days not hearing any. Is it still in us? I have 2 PK-232's not in use for sometime now and will try to sell, give away or donate to the trash system. John, W0JAB

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS is back bigger and better !!!

point someone has got to give. Still thinking about sellingEVERYTHING cheap. John, W0JAB

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS back bigger and better !

een hiding your pactor station at? John At 11:26 PM 8/29/2010, you wrote: >Thank you, John, Sir. > >Howard W6IDS >Richmond, IN EM79NV

RE: [digitalradio] Re: ROS back bigger and better !

ow is that they (the robots) are now on WINMOR for the most part. So now you really must ask yourself before you QRM that pactor "is that really a robot or 2 in a pactor QSO." John, W0JAB

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS back bigger and better !

The ARRL response was that the final proposal retained the existing automatic subands. 73, John KD6OZH - Original Message - >>>When that 1 percent deploys unattended stations that transmit without first checking to see if the frequency is in use, they can create havoc

Re: [digitalradio] Digital Voice update #2 - programmers wanted - codec2 and the G3PLX modem

Speaking of digital voice I had a nice but short QSO today while driving home from a event I had been to. I was really shocked because out of the clear blue I had been listening to VHF when the HF radio started talking. So I just had to answer his DV CQ. John, W0JAB

Re: [digitalradio] speaking of digital voice

At 04:34 PM 8/27/2010, you wrote: >Can you check and repost that link? > >ve3bdr Seems to be a problem with the site for some reason here it is.. 1393d54.jpg <>

[digitalradio] speaking of digital voice

mobile set up. John W0JAB in hot Missouri - where it STILL takes only 1.5 hours to bake a potato in a closed car.. dit dit

[digitalradio] off lineI'll be off line for a while.

ted. Till then Questions or comments IM me on the yahoo system ID W0JAB of course. John

Re: [digitalradio] Re:Streetlight RFI found with AM portable

A trick that you might try is that when you find an offending pole, give it a good whack with a sledgehammer to see if the noise changes. We tracked down a couple of poles that were throwing some serious RFI out, and that's how the power company guy verified where the problem was. Seems that th

[digitalradio] off line for a while

I'll be off line for a while - having a big problem getting my email program to work with Hughes net. And I almost have to fix it myself since I CAN"T understand what the tech support guy in New Delhi India is telling my. No speak that broken whatever it is. John, W0JAB

[digitalradio] WSPR

The current version of WSPR seems to randomly fail , and I get the usual “this program has encountered an error and must close” Any suggestions as to how I can get it to run for more than ½ hour? John VE5MU

Re: [digitalradio] SCS PTC-II and regular digital modes

under ESP. I can not speak for the sound card modes that it has since my shack computer has now sound card but it's my understanding it does fair there. John, W0JAB At 04:31 PM 8/6/2010, you wrote: >I have been wondering about getting an SCS multimode controller, the PTC-II >USB

Re: [digitalradio] Re: RTTY parts

At 10:08 AM 8/4/2010, you wrote: >Do you have a list? No I don't. Sorry

RE: [digitalradio] Re: Direct RTTY Generation

At 04:42 AM 8/4/2010, you wrote (in part): >I was thinking about this while walking the dog - Now that's a new one. Bets the last number one answer to the age old "thinking" question..

[digitalradio] RTTY parts

A large number of RTTY parts have been put up for sale. If anyone is looking for anything please ask. John, W0JAB Louisiana, Missouri

[digitalradio] Parting with RTTY equipment

After thinking about a for a while - I'm going to part with all my RTTY equipment. It's all going. John, W0JAB

Re: AW: AW: [digitalradio] Operating ROS In USA

just where you are trying to go but it seems that it is again an "anti wide" rant. If it is you can save the rest of us from it. John, W0JAB

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS back bigger and better !

The hell with the rules and law, right Garrett? John, W0JAB At 05:48 PM 7/19/2010, you wrote: >What is absurd is that its a fight in the first place.. do you ever just back >up and look at what is being said?? Your all acting like this is life or >death..ITS NOT..I have been usi

Re: [digitalradio] Repeater noise

One of 2 things come to mind. 1) a very weak station trying to get into the repeater. 2) strong RF. At 11:18 AM 7/18/2010, you wrote: >[Attachment(s) from Mike Liller included below] > >Hi all, >I know this is a little of topic, but can anyone tell me what this noise is? >We are getting this

Re: [digitalradio] RTTY and common courtesy

I'm not in anyway saying that what happened was OK but after all it was a contest. Not like it happens all the time. But look at the good side. Lucky it was not a CW contest. John, W0JAB Louisiana, Missouri EM49lk Pike county for the county hunters. At 10:56 AM 7/18/2010, you wrote: >

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS v4.7.4 Beta

28 RO & 2, 28ASR's) and still use them all. John, W0JAB

Re: [digitalradio] RE-NEW LICENSE

At 11:52 AM 7/17/2010, you wrote: >And if you are an ARRL member, they will do it for you free. > >73 Buddy WB4M Thanks buddy, and yes, a life member Do I need to do anything or is this an "automatic" happens thing they do? John, W0JAB HOT & STICKY Missouri. Q

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS back bigger and better !

I wonder where ROS would be today if someone had been truthful about it the first place? That little game of banning some from using it (for unknown reasons) was just about it for me. John, W0JAB

RE: [digitalradio] Re: ROS

If one was to just disconnect from the net would the program later try to post? It seems that this is the main concern of many? John, W0JAB EM49lk

Re: [digitalradio] Random data vs Spread Spectrum

On 7/12/2010 12:28:28 PM, KH6TY wrote: > Lester, The "inventor" has shown over and over that he is not to be trusted, > and > so his block diagram would not be believed either. I suggested months ago > to him to just send his code in confidence to the FCC, which they would > keep private, and be

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Testing Confirms ROS Autospot Behaviour

The other day after making a comment about ROS I got a note (direct) just saying - "makes one wonder what else the program is doing. Do you have your banking information on that computer ?"

RE: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC

At 01:44 PM 7/9/2010, you wrote: >John, > >Who is Andy, K3UK? Andy is the list owner. And yes anyone can discuss ROS at any point and time. And many are still looking for an answer of why some (at one point or another) was banned from using the program. Now you seem to be a spokesp

RE: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC

I think many would like to have a answer once and for all on this issue if some have been "banned" from using the software. John, W0JAB digitalradio co moderator At 12:54 PM 7/9/2010, you wrote: >Could this ROS discussion be taken offline or elsewhere? > >I expect others,

Re: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC

n. I will never try ROS again. I did not try it on the XYL's and will not. At 12:43 PM 7/9/2010, you wrote: >OK John. > >Understood. > >Did it work on your computer? >Did it work on the xyl's computer? > >( I like to know whether there is such a list in the pr

Re: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC

Sorry Rein - Please forgive as that was about the time I was having big time computer problems. Lost a bunch of emails. what was that my "final question" again. John, W0JAB

Re: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC

At 08:58 AM 7/9/2010, you wrote: > extremely wicked; "nefarious schemes"; "a villainous plot"; "a villainous > band of thieves" Rein are you trying to tell us that NONE of this never happened ? The list of banned, and other thing that have been posted that this program has been said to do. Thi

Re: [digitalradio] How ROS is auto-spotting to the Cluster.

>> What other surprises are hidden in this software? None ! program has been removed. firewall settings changed to block anything that may still be imbedded.

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS are sending data from your PC

At 06:18 PM 7/8/2010, you wrote: >Hi John, > > >That IP address is probably a cluster in Sweden that was added by Jose to the >list of clusters to be served by ROS users. >Amateur radio is a global hobby. > >73 Rein W6SZ Oh I agree about the being "global" bu

Re: [digitalradio] ROS are sending data from your PC

At 02:28 PM 7/8/2010, you wrote: >Hi Rain > >You have absolutely right . ROS are sending data from your PC to the >cluster. Try to type the IP address 90.225.73.203:8000 into your >browser and you get this: Why would it telnet to an IP address in Sweden?

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS on 40 meters

At 04:04 PM 7/6/2010, you wrote in part: >UH OH.now I've done it. Bet I won't ever get on their forum, much less >be able >to use ROS any time soon I'm down in the dingy cellar now with >the >likes of John W0JAB! > >Howard W6IDS >Richmond, IN EM79

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS on 40 meters

At 09:46 AM 7/7/2010, you wrote: >--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Siegfried Jackstien" > wrote: ><..> >> Ros is programmed for low power qrppp experiments . with a few watt and a >> groundplane for a 16000 km path .. But there are users thinking more power >> is better . and using ros the

Re: [digitalradio] ROS on 40 meters

If I download a new version I will "NOT" be able to use the program. For a unknown reason I was one of the people that Jose has seen unfit to use it. That was the reason I had to "beg" for a earlier venison of it. But thanks for your reply. At 03:50 PM 7/5/2010, you wrote: >If you downloa

[digitalradio] ROS on 40 meters

What freq is the ROS mode being used on 40 Meters? World like to play with it a bit. John

RE: [digitalradio] Busy detect

rs modes is my ears and the LED's on the TNC. John, W0JAB

Re: [digitalradio] Winmor throughput

Well Andy, I have that $1K modem. but in order to run WINMOR I would have to putout for a new faster computer. So what better? hen in hand or the one in the bush? At 12:56 PM 6/27/2010, you wrote: >Just a reminder..when Winmor first stated, the idea was to establish a >mode that did not need a

RE: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor

it's a MBO *just* because it's pactor. Wish I knew a way to help those with that thinking. John, W0JAB

Re: [digitalradio] QRM maker on 14.078 CF

For what it's worth : I have been very close to that freq waiting for any pactor connect. I have not noticed anything. Must be just outside of what I can hear. John, W0JAB

Re: [digitalradio] New release (4.18) of MULTIPSK

Over the course of my work as a 2way radio tech I have looked at a lot of circuits for one project or another your's being one of them Very interesting how you made that puppy. Also just about an hour ago my radio went off. John, W0JAB At 10:13 AM 6/19/2010, you wrote: >John, &

Re: [digitalradio] New release (4.18) of MULTIPSK

Sometime I would like to hear how it all started. Bet you could write a book on that. John, W0JAB

Re: [digitalradio] Feld Hell "LEO" Sprint this Saturday 2000z - 2200z

WB2HTO de N3LFC ur 599 PA FH002 LEO") Winner will have worked the most LEOs. >Extra bonus for contacts made on 10 meters. I think next time it would be better to spell it out. The AMSAT part of me say it's "low earth orbit" when I first saw the post. John, W0JAB, AMSAT life member

RE: [digitalradio] source coding, Randomizing

By the same thinking (that being that a commercial company) is making any money should you not put kenwood and yaesu into the same? Or how about that mean money making company that made your sound card interface. or microsoft. John, W0JAB At 10:12 AM 6/6/2010, you wrote: >You can

Re: [digitalradio] source coding,

> >I just do not believe amateur operators should use >such protocols on the amateur bands. Such protocols ? What makes you say that?

Re: [digitalradio] source coding, Randomizing, outer FEC, Inner FEC, coding to symbol, modulation of symbol(s)

At 03:22 AM 6/6/2010, you wrote: (in part) >In the end, systems like ROS, Clover, PACKTOR-XXX, etc, where there is not >full published trasparency in the encoding process, are not suitable for >legal amateur use, in my humble opinion. In other words, no one has the right to make money from their

Re: [digitalradio] Bad sound card?

Jeremy Maybe the fact that it was 10 bucks may have something to do with it. At 02:24 PM 6/5/2010, you wrote: >Hello, > >When purchasing a new radio this last week I decided to also set my >computer up how it should have been long ago. I purchased a sound card >to dedicate it to digital mode

Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP

I think that is what I said below now in RED By my call I mean W0JAB At 12:44 PM 6/2/2010, you wrote: >- Original Message - >> But since I have it on a flash drive I did install it on the laptop and >> gave it a call other then my call and it worked fine. >> >> What do you think? >> >>

Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP

No need to worry from being banned from this list from me. That's not my style of moderating. Yes I can no longer use ROS for some reason. I did ask but that went unanswered. All I know is that he posted a updated version and when ask for my call the program would shut down if I recall. Never di

Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP

ime is not saying. So be it - I got over it long ago. John, W0JAB

Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP

Rein Don't take it personal. For some reason even I got on his bad list. I did ask but never got an answer. Not sure but I think someone has been feeding bad info to him. Think he was told that I has said something that I really did not or it was misunderstood. John, W0JAB

Re: [digitalradio] Digitalradio: Facebook change. [a word about facebook]

No can do. facebook is one of those sites that "read" "write" and otherwise do things that most don't like to have done to their system. It would take me the better part of 1/2 hour to get past the "site is reading" or "writing" or trying whatever. Just to get to it. And I think I have told

Re: [digitalradio] Change of Email Address

As moderator of a number of yahoo list I can tell you first hand you have to make the change yourself. No one here can do it for you. At 12:40 PM 5/23/2010, you wrote: >We are changing our email address from >laz...@earthlink.net >to l

Re: [digitalradio] ALE 400

I was wondering what that noise was. Guess the pactor did not bother you.

[digitalradio] Another WINMOR protocol speaker in the works

Maiko, VE4KLM, is working on interfacing the WINMOR TNC code into JNOS 2.0, which also supports a number of different TNCs. http://www.langelaar.net/projects/jnos2/ Looks pretty interesting - it will also perform B2F attachment forwarding to Winlink 2000. 73, john

Re: [digitalradio] Why does the ARRL continue to push for Pactor III support...

Now I Have only been a have since 1968 and still learning. But I don't recall all of this happening 10 or more years ago. John, W0JAB At 03:09 PM 5/11/2010, you wrote: >John, I asked you the same question, but you did not answer mine. :-( > >Just as I thought, the only reason

Re: [digitalradio] in need of a USB to DB9 cable

Just a cable. 232 in and out. BD9 on one end USB on the other Sorry for any confusion. At 11:42 AM 5/11/2010, you wrote: >On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:52:15AM -0500, "John Becker, WJAB" wrote: >> Anyone know of a source? > >It would help to hear more about the application

[digitalradio] in need of a USB to DB9 cable

Anyone know of a source? John, W0JAB

Re: [digitalradio] Why does the ARRL continue to push for Pactor III support...

At 06:27 PM 5/10/2010, you wrote: >Another question was whether Pactor III's bandwidth was really necessary for >live keyboard to keyboard QSOs. I guess that was an anti-Pactor III question, >but that one also never got answered. Jim to answer that I really would have to say that for keyboard

Re: [digitalradio] Re: why does the ARRL.......

At 05:18 PM 5/10/2010, you wrote: >Yes, > >14.075 was the Pactor "calling freq", don't know who decided that. I have >not heard any ARQ Pactor in a long time, is it still used by anyone? > >73 Buddy WB4M Yes it still is but it has been driven to the coat room by all the sound card user. Seems

Re: [digitalradio] Why does the ARRL continue to push for Pactor III support...

I don't know Skip. Tell us. You seem to have an answer for everything and everyone. after thinking about that, don't tell us. I really don't care what you are others think about pactor. I like it and will operate it. John, W0JAB

Re: [digitalradio] Why does the ARRL continue to push for Pactor III support...

At 03:12 PM 5/10/2010, you wrote: >John, > >I was specifically asking only about Pactor-III keyboard-to-keyboard QSO's, >not Pactor-II or Pactor I. Skip, just because you are anyone else "can't" copy P2 or P3 does not mean it does not happen. Belive me, it h

Re: [digitalradio] Re: why does the ARRL.......

At 02:51 PM 5/10/2010, you wrote: >Unfortunately lots of people have had bad experiences with Pactor >and,naturally, like when you've been bitten by a big dog you don't forget it ! >I used to enjoy using pactor with my PK232 during the 90's but many times my >contacts were totally wiped out by a

Re: [digitalradio] Why does the ARRL continue to push for Pactor III support...

Often, very often. All pactor modes. As for a typing. touch typing is a thing of the past. At 02:19 PM 5/10/2010, you wrote: >John, > >How frequently do you use Pactor-III, keyboard to keyboard? > >How fast do you touch type?

RE: [digitalradio] Why does the ARRL continue to push for Pactor III support...

book. But to answer that question - "Why does the ARRL continue to push for Pactor III " because it works, and works well. John, W0JAB At 01:23 PM 5/10/2010, AA6YQ wrote: > >>>It's an "anti-Winlink without busy frequency detection" rant, John. > > 73, > > Dave, AA6YQ

Re: [digitalradio] Why does the ARRL continue to push for Pactor III support...

I can clearly see that this anti Pactor rant will Never end. John, W0JAB

Re: [digitalradio] Congratulations!!!

weeks) since either has been seen. If it was Pactor it had to be a keyboard to keyboard QSO. I'm in *no way* saying it was not Pactor but I'am saying likelihood of it being a winlink stations are very low. John, W0JAB

Re: [digitalradio] TAPR Digital Activities at Dayton Hamvention, May 15-16, 2010

I cant speak for others but I just got this very same message 23 times. I have banned him from *EVERY* list that I own. Andy I sure hope you do also. And I'm sure others will say the same thing. I ONLY need to see it once not 23 damn times. John, W0JAB

Re: [digitalradio] 3rd Generation Digital radio

I can't think back this far. What came first - Packer or Amtor (ARQ mode to boot) . At 12:03 PM 4/19/2010, you wrote: >If the first generation of digital was PACKET-IRLQ-Echolink-APRS (generation >Zero was CW and RTTY), then the second generation was D-Star. D-Star brought >everything togethe

Re: [digitalradio] RSID Query

Only works with sound card modes? That a question not a comment. I really have no clue.

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Unattended narrow mode transmission "protection"

this is a non-sound card station. Thats right not a one. In fact the sack computer is an old 8088 running DOS. Does real well with pactor and amtor as well as just a few others. need I say more? John, W0JAB w0...@big-river.net 573-754-4715

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Unattended narrow mode transmission "protection"

Dave right now I dont have the time to plug the holes in your comments. But the bottom line is that they are ham's at see. Would there be a problem if they only used SSB and not data mode?

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Unattended narrow mode transmission "protection"

ACH and EVERY one has a ham call? Just because *some* don't use the mode does not mean it's a junk mode. And it would *really* be nice if some that did speak up a least operated the mode before bad talking it. So please let's not get this started once again. John, W0JAB Louis

Re: [digitalradio] "evil Bonnie"..

At 09:57 AM 4/8/2010, you wrote: >John > >i have been there too Remember wide band digital on 6 and 2 meters ? I was removed by her from one list for asking questions that 2nd guessed her. The list was the yahoo VX1700 list. That is a Vertex radio. I have retired after

Re: [digitalradio] "evil Bonnie"..

I for one can tell you first hand what happens if for any reason you should disagree with her.

[digitalradio]

try this list http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pactor_packet/

RE: [digitalradio] RTTY event tonight

About 7ish (CDST) At 02:52 PM 3/26/2010, you wrote: >What hours?? > > > >Bob, W5XR > >

[digitalradio] RTTY event tonight

playing tonight only I will be on 40 meters tonight with the Kenwood 520 and the 28ASR, ST-6 TU. Why? Because I can !

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Another plug for JT65A ... the spectrum efficient mode

At 01:01 PM 3/25/2010, you wrote: >That seems a bit theoretical to me. If you have a mode that is very wide but >gets its information across in short bursts, it could be said to be very >efficient, but in practise it is efficient only if others are able to make use >of the gaps between transmiss

Re: [digitalradio] Re: A new concept in digital mode....

I and many others will never touch ALE because of just one woman. It at this time has a bad name among many.

Re: [digitalradio] Re: SDR-IQ for sale

Guess I better Google it to see just what it is. Right now I have no clue.

Re: [digitalradio] From The Desk Top Of Mr Alex Eze.

instructions on how to complete this deposit transaction. -- John "Smokey Behr" Gleichweit FF1/EMT, CCNA, MCSE IPN-CAL023 N6FOG UP Fresno Sub MP183.5 ECV1852 List Owner x10, Moderator x9 CalEMA 51-507 http://smokeybehr.blogspot.com http://www.myspace.com/smokeybehr > >From: Alex Eze >

Re: [digitalradio] Re: 1976 FCC - Delete all Emission Types from Part 97

I assumed that people kept using FSK because paths to Europe can have 20-30 Hz of Doppler spread. 73, John KD6OZH - Original Message - From: KH6TY To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 19:08 UTC Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: 1976 FCC - Delete all

Re: [digitalradio] A question about spread spectrum

currently exist in the phone/image segments (AM equivalent bandwidth) as the ARRL was shrinking bandwidths in the RTTY/data segments (currently unlimited bandwidth). 73, John KD6OZH - Original Message - From: KH6TY To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2010 14

Re: [digitalradio] What is SS?

pped to tones. Users comparing the original and later versions of the code haven't seen a difference in the transmitted spectrum. 73, John KD6OZH - Original Message - From: Rein A To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 19:16 UTC Subject: [digitalr

[digitalradio] ROS controversy

oncern yourself with moderating my posts any further to protect your agenda. I am outta here 73 John KE5HAM

Re: [digitalradio] ROS update

Amateur radio technology must not advance and we must continue to use only old modes. Make sure we keep ham radio stagnant and only hope commercial businesses move forward and kill our hobby Bob, AA8X . - Original Message - From: Dave Ackrill To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com S

Re: [digitalradio] FCC comments further on ROS

I had no doubt that it would once the document that the FCC requires was published. Since European hams don't normally read FCC regulations, it might be useful for the IARU or RSGB to publish an article about U.S. regulations so this doesn't happen again. 73, John KD6OZH

Re: [digitalradio] FCC comments further on ROS

Jose has K3TL said anything about his action?

Re: [digitalradio] Spectrum is for ALL users

At 05:40 PM 3/1/2010, you wrote: >The problem is that 14109 has been designated as 1 baud exclusive, It has?

Re: [digitalradio] Re: There is a pattern in the ROS signal when idling

The portions that are causing problems here aren't in the regulations in other countries. 73, John KD6OZH - Original Message - From: W2XJ To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 01:14 UTC Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: There is a pattern in th

Re: [digitalradio] Re: There is a pattern in the ROS signal when idling

The problem is that the FCC regulations are overly complex and people need a specialized engineering background to interpret some of them. 99% of the licensees probably can't interpret every word in the regulations so they ask for help in this forum when something is not clear. 73,

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >