Dave,
to see if you have pactor. at the cmd: prompt
type pt it should come back with
Opmode was (whatever it's in at the time)
Opmode now PACTOR
if it does not have pactor it will cam back with
?What?
Cmd:
Any question feel free to ask.
I have had one of these animals since 1987..
I have been playing with digital voice on HF now for about a year and
a half. It is great! I belive [2] below is talking about DV being able
to sent both data and images.
As always, comments are welcomed.
John, WØJAB
QUOTE FROM the results of FCC NPRM RM-10740, Wednesday November 24, 2004.
Tony,
what time of day was this?
Love to see the screen shoot. sent it direct.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John
At 06:35 AM 6/4/05, you wrote:
Andrew,
Had a nice chat with Derek (ZL1CYK) on 20 meter MT63. I snapped a screenshot
at the end of our QSO -- see attached file.
Worked several stations on 20
Andy,
same thing here now. Was not doing it yesterday.
Using win 98se and IE 6.0
At 05:23 PM 6/2/05, you wrote:
You are the 4th person to complain about this, I'm still trying to figure
out what is happening. Most other people have had no problems.
Andy K3UK
- Original Message -
ok now
what did you do?
At 06:20 PM 6/2/05, you wrote:
try now, see what happens
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/
* To unsubscribe from this
the packet systems too Mike?
They also handle a lot of what some here
are calling email. Or should all traffic nets
that pass anything that could be sent via AOL
be shut down.
Seem to me everything was rosy till PSK got here.
This anti- any mode except for crap has got to stop soon.
Paul is right !
Remember what happen to the 220Mhz band?
When all the money showed up on the other side.
At 08:21 AM 4/9/05, you wrote:
Actually, in some respects, it is the FCC who understands,
and the amateur community that doesn't.
It costs money to regulate the airwaves, and there are a
I can understand moderating new member but,
I don't think I fall into that group since I have been
a member of your list for years.
So, what is the reason you feel I need to be moderated ?
Could it because I call em as I see em?
I have always been straight with you now it's your turn
to do the
At 10:23 PM 4/6/05, you wrote:
I think you grossly misunderstood
me. I participated in and approve of
automated systems, when done as it is on 2M. When interference is
prevented
by clearly described rules and agreements, it's fine.
That seems to be NOT the case in the HF bands, at present.
I take it you ham been a ham for 10 years or less ?
Or just don't remember per internet and all those
packet system all running unattended.. Then came
pactor as to what is in now.
John, WØJAB
At 01:01 PM 4/5/05, you wrote:
I think this opinion is false-to-fact. IMO, most Hams want direct,
I also have been a BBS SYSOP since 1983
First running on a 64k radio shack system
and later the MSYS...
Sorry if I got you all up-set man
At 04:46 PM 4/5/05, you wrote:
I was first licensed in 1952, and have been an alternate sysop on a packet
BBS, Thank you. Your rash assumptions may
And what if it did happen?
At least we would be away from the RTTY and Pactor.
At 04:34 PM 4/4/05, you wrote:
Urgent!
The following was just posted on www.zerobeat.net.
Please read carefully and send comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Failure to
do may result in
PSK31 operations being
Good article.
I put my service monitor on to the HAL ST-6 just to
see how *tight* the filters are.
Mark 2125 Hz would drop out +/- 10 Hz.
Space 2295 Hz drops out at +/- 12 Hz.
the other 2 are 11 and 10 Hz..
I tuned these boards at work. The lab at then McDonnell
Douglas with the best
FWIW
We have installed new software on the big-river dot net server
that has tagged something yahoo is sending as spam. The phone
has been ringing off the hook because people are getting bounced
from yahoo left and right I have been dumped every day for the
last to weeks. So what ever it is
I never did get it to run on 98SE...
Gave up on it till all the bugs are worked out.
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
a href=http://dxcluster.blogspot.com;img
src=http://feeds.feedburner.com/DigitalSpotter.gif; height=67 width=200
style=border:0
Sorry OM I did not read you message ( I among other
don't download HTML message) but got the jest from
the subject line...
try http://www.nist.gov ever this you need to know
it there...
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
a
just use whatever band you are on.
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
a href=http://dxcluster.blogspot.com;img
src=http://feeds.feedburner.com/DigitalSpotter.gif; height=67 width=200
style=border:0 alt=Digital Spotter//a
Yahoo!
North American QSO Party, RTTY: 1800Z, Feb 26 to 0600Z, Feb 27
Mode: RTTY
Bands: 80, 40, 20, 15, 10m
Classes: Single Op (QRP/Low)
Multi-Two (Low)
Max operating hours: Single Op: 10 hours
Multi-Two: 12 hours
Max power: LP: 100 watts
That's HELL
At 10:36 AM 2/23/05, you wrote:
I am not familuar with a type of digital mode I have been hearing on
20 MTRS. The freq is 14082.6. It sounds like a cross between cw and a
worbler. Can anyone tell me what it is and how do I set up to rcve it.
Thanks
Chris KA8MXN
The K3UK
When was the last time you used that sound card and had a
ARQ Amtor or a Pactor ARQ QSO ? You can't do that with a
sound card.
I have been playing with a linux program but even it's only about
42% of the 100% of the TNC..
BOTTOM LINE:
your sound card just can't cut it.
And when using my ST-6 TU
At 09:27 PM 2/20/05, you wrote:
OK, I have got myself connected, please give it a try.
I had to change the forwarded ports on my DSL router.
OK Andy it works
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
a href=http://dxcluster.blogspot.com;img
Nice try..
At 07:29 PM 2/19/05, you wrote:
this thread has been CLOSED.
please take private and off group.
moderator
Cliff N7HIY
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
a href=http://dxcluster.blogspot.com;img
I can see it now...
sub band after sub band
Say DXing..
100 to 150 watts 50 foot tower or less, 5 element or less.
What's wrong with the way it is now...
At 08:27 PM 2/18/05, you wrote:
Thats exactly what I see happening here. It will be subbands by bandwidth,
and exactly as it should be.
At 10:44 PM 2/13/05, Leigh L Klotz, Jr. wrote:
I would agree with you right up to this point.
I doubt that many contestors who run sensitive
receivers would have trouble seeing the QSOs
going on How are they to be * seeing * you ?
Remember, RTTY for the most part is still a
hardware mode.
701 - 724 of 724 matches
Mail list logo
