Yes, mainly when another station decises to start a QSO on top of it. "Roger J. Buffington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Rick Scott wrote:> My take is that the frequencies are NOT guaranteed by the FCC Period. > And if an Active QSO is in progress, and the Auto op interferes with > that QSO its
That might be your take but it won't happen. I have run a packet BBS on 14.098 for over 13 years. Come on down and try to get me a fine. If it's AUTO I'm not there! Rick Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:My take is that the frequencies are NOT guaranteed by the FCC Period. And if an Acti
While they had NO RIGHT to tell you that. Don't be the one to complain when it runs over your QSO when it takes off if any of it is automatic. Maybe that's what he was trying to say. 73 Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:In a message dated 11/21/2005 7:47:34 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
Here I thought it was just me he was irritating. Dave n4zkf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rich!,Nice to see you back buddy! You must have come back from the Betty Ford Clinic. We haven't seen you and your drunk, vulgar, ramblings since August 5th, 2005 at 1:30 p.m. I believe you
Why don't we can your PSK31 and we won't have to listing to you anymore?
Some people still like packet.
Nice vocabulary too.
Dave
n4zkf
swl0720 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This morning on 40m was qrmed by a pactrash station calling for WG3G, as usual, N7QDN and W7NTF. I
Do you think RTTY should be the only one allowed in the lower side of 20?
Dave
n4zkf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see your point. I have been through some hurricanes here in NC that took out my power for over a week at at time. I did not use WinLink, nor did anyone else, to contact the
I also agree it should have it's own space. What I don't agree on is one group OR one mode getting it's own little piece of the pie all to itself.
Dave
n4zkf
"Steve Waterman, k4cjx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With proper band planning by bandwidth, this issue
There are 11 of us in 14.098 actually. We all forward with each other and is bbs connects only is why you didn't get a response.
73 Dave
n4zkf
Danny Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, Mark. While sitting here, it suddenly started decoding, as a BBS inMo. Very strong signal
Where do you see Winlink carries 75% of all traffic? Did you just pull that out of the air?
I have run a 4 port packet bbs for over ten years and still get about 300 plus bulletins a
day thru it. So it's not all going thru "winlink".
Dave
n4zkf
"Dr. Howard S. Whit
I can't count the number of personal messages and bulletins my packet BBS has forwarded in the last 10+ years. I'm glad not everyone thinks the way you do about automation of text.
73 Dave
n4zkf
Bill Aycock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think this opinion is false-to-fact. IMO
10 matches
Mail list logo
