UTC
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] 1000 Hz Olivia under USA new rules ?
Joe,
Your explanation may explain what the FCC meant when they wrote:
To accommodate the concern raised by ARRL, however, we will
revise our rules to clarify that the 500 Hz limitation applies only to
the emission
I would expect that we will be able to get some help from ARRL HQ on
this since they could publish a list of modes along with their
classifications. That would help a great deal.
Don't know if you saw it or not, but the ARRL updated the article on
their web site today specifically on this
Joe,
I think your interpretation is correct, but there is much
misinformation about this, mainly from
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2006/11/15/100/?nc=1 .
73,
Mark N5RFX
My interpretation, which is as good as any at this point, is that
telegraphy is plain text to be read and interpreted
John,
The direct printing could also refer to the older technologies of
printing to a TD couldn't it? It would be possible to then relay that
information without actually printing it out, such as on a sheet of
paper with a teleprinter or on a monitor screen? Or would that become data?
It is
As of Dec 15 Pactor-III running at a bandwidth of greater than 500 Hz
(such as Winlink) is not permissible below 30 MHz. This is one of the
petition to reconsider items being considered by the ARRL Board of
Directors.
Of course any digital mode 500Hz bandwidth on any frequency =30Mhz is
Andy,
Yes, the new rules will not allow any modes to be used in the MF and HF
CW/Data/RTTY portions of the bands unless they are 500 Hz or less in
bandwidth. Many of the modes can greatly exceed 500 Hz, such as the
wider submodes of the modes you noted. Other modes that will no longer
be
In my opinion, this is absolutely WRONG. I have said this here before,
it all comes down to what is considered data.
The new restrictions only cover content type D, which is Data,
telemetry or telecommand. It does *NOT* include type B, which is
telegraphy for automatic reception. It is already
Joe,
Your explanation may explain what the FCC meant when they wrote:
To accommodate the concern raised by ARRL, however, we will
revise our rules to clarify that the 500 Hz limitation applies only to
the emission types we are
adding to the definition of data when transmitted on amateur service
Joe, that was my interpretation when I read it a few weeks ago. I think I
will just continue to operate politely with Olivia 1000 Hz and wait until
the FCC tells me I cannot do it. Then we would have a good test case
- Original Message -
From: Joe Veldhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In my
