Re: Re[2]: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network

2006-03-04 Thread Dr. Howard S. White
- Katrina, 2003 San Diego Fires, 911" - Original Message - From: Flavio Padovani To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 9:59 AM Subject: Re[2]: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network Saludo

Re: Re[2]: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network

2006-03-03 Thread Andrew O'Brien
Looks like Steve has worked hard on the project.  Good luck Steve.   Andy K3UK Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to  Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol  (ban

Re[2]: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network

2006-03-03 Thread Flavio Padovani
Saludos Dr., I strongly disagree with your point. Read the definition of the 97.3.(a).(4). Nowhere is Emergency Communications mentioned. 97.3 (4)Amateur service. A radiocommunication service for the purpose of self training, intercommunication and technical investigations carried out by amateu

Re: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network

2006-03-03 Thread Danny Douglas
, except for practice.    - Original Message - From: John Becker To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 12:53 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network Everything in blue.And just why do

Re: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network

2006-03-03 Thread John Becker
Everything in blue. And just why do you think it should be used outside of the ham bands? Got something against traffic handling? At 11:39 AM 3/3/06, you wrote: You totally disagree with what?  Both that it is a good mode to use Outside our bands, or that is should be used outside and not ins

Re: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network

2006-03-03 Thread Danny Douglas
1 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network > I totally disagree ! > > At 10:03 AM 3/3/06, you wrote: > >I think that is just fine, and a perfect example of where and when > >something like Winlink could and should be used.

Re: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network

2006-03-03 Thread John Becker
I totally disagree ! At 10:03 AM 3/3/06, you wrote: >I think that is just fine, and a perfect example of where and when >something like Winlink could and should be used. Outside the amateur >bands. If the government wants hams to be involved in emergency >communications they should do the sam

Re: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network

2006-03-03 Thread Dr. Howard S. White
From: Danny Douglas To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 8:03 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network I think that is just fine, and a perfect example of where and when something li

Re: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network

2006-03-03 Thread Danny Douglas
: Thursday, March 02, 2006 11:59 PM Subject: [digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network This announcement should really stir up some new rantings from the Anti-Everything Forces...   http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2006/03/02/5/?nc=1   Have

[digitalradio] ARRLWeb: Army MARS Implementing Winlink 2000 with Airmail Network

2006-03-02 Thread Dr. Howard S. White
This announcement should really stir up some new rantings from the Anti-Everything Forces...   http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2006/03/02/5/?nc=1   Have fun!!! __Howard S. White Ph.D. P. Eng., VE3GFW/K6  ex-AE6SM  KY6LAWebsite: www.ky