proposals/local HF net successes
You still don't get it it's not me you need to betalking to go post
this on 6 meter user groupswebsites and see if they agree with you
.--- John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED]com
wrote: Bruce, The segment 50.5 - 51 is too small.
Remember we need
Rick
If someone had proposed 50.5-51.00 ( NOT 50.300 -
54.000 ) for SS 99% of us could have lived with that.
That part of the band is very lightly used except for
some psk digi radios that are already there.
No one I know of is opposed to digital anything unless
it is going to interfere
: [digitalradio] Don't ignore proposals/local HF net successes
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 04:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
Rick
If someone had proposed 50.5-51.00 ( NOT 50.300 -
54.000 ) for SS 99% of us could have lived with that.
That part of the band is very lightly used except for
some psk digi radios
in the 6M band do you or SMIRK
suggest we set up
housekeeping?
John - K8OCL
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Don't ignore
proposals/local HF net successes
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 04:10
Can you give me the name of some 6 meter user groups?
Larry ve3fxq
- Original Message -
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Don't ignore proposals/local HF net successes
You still
Can you give me the name of some 6 meter user groups?
Larry ve3fxq
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Thanks! 73,
doc, KD4E
... somewhere in FL
URL: bibleseven (dot) com
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector :
It's not only the current users that are important but the future users.
What about the potential amateurs in Jr High School. How do we make the
bands useful for them? I suggest the question is not if they will be
using them in the future, but under which regulations - Part 97 or Part
15.
] Don't ignore
proposals/local HF net successes
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 04:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
Rick
If someone had proposed 50.5-51.00 ( NOT 50.300 -
54.000 ) for SS 99% of us could have lived with
that.
That part of the band is very lightly used except
for
some psk digi
@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Don't ignore proposals/local HF net successes
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 18:30:28 -0500
Bruce,
The ARRL is not generally going to ask other groups for input. It would
really be a bit unethical if my organization bypasses me and goes to
another
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 11:12 PM
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Don't ignore proposals/local HF net successes
Rick,
I have had the same experience here too, especially regarding 6M and 10M
bands.
Out of the hundreds of Hams in the area, I
10 matches
Mail list logo