Re: [digitalradio] Don't ignore proposals/local HF net successes

2006-10-27 Thread John B. Stephensen
proposals/local HF net successes You still don't get it it's not me you need to betalking to go post this on 6 meter user groupswebsites and see if they agree with you .--- John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED]com wrote: Bruce, The segment 50.5 - 51 is too small. Remember we need

Re: [digitalradio] Don't ignore proposals/local HF net successes

2006-10-25 Thread bruce mallon
Rick If someone had proposed 50.5-51.00 ( NOT 50.300 - 54.000 ) for SS 99% of us could have lived with that. That part of the band is very lightly used except for some psk digi radios that are already there. No one I know of is opposed to digital anything unless it is going to interfere

Re: [digitalradio] Don't ignore proposals/local HF net successes

2006-10-25 Thread John Champa
: [digitalradio] Don't ignore proposals/local HF net successes Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 04:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Rick If someone had proposed 50.5-51.00 ( NOT 50.300 - 54.000 ) for SS 99% of us could have lived with that. That part of the band is very lightly used except for some psk digi radios

Re: [digitalradio] Don't ignore proposals/local HF net successes

2006-10-25 Thread bruce mallon
in the 6M band do you or SMIRK suggest we set up housekeeping? John - K8OCL From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Don't ignore proposals/local HF net successes Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 04:10

Re: [digitalradio] Don't ignore proposals/local HF net successes

2006-10-25 Thread larry allen
Can you give me the name of some 6 meter user groups? Larry ve3fxq - Original Message - From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 3:06 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Don't ignore proposals/local HF net successes You still

Re: [digitalradio] Don't ignore proposals/local HF net successes

2006-10-25 Thread kd4e
Can you give me the name of some 6 meter user groups? Larry ve3fxq [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Thanks! 73, doc, KD4E ... somewhere in FL URL: bibleseven (dot) com Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector :

Re: [digitalradio] Don't ignore proposals/local HF net successes

2006-10-25 Thread wa7nwp
It's not only the current users that are important but the future users. What about the potential amateurs in Jr High School. How do we make the bands useful for them? I suggest the question is not if they will be using them in the future, but under which regulations - Part 97 or Part 15.

Re: [digitalradio] Don't ignore proposals/local HF net successes

2006-10-25 Thread John Champa
] Don't ignore proposals/local HF net successes Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 04:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Rick If someone had proposed 50.5-51.00 ( NOT 50.300 - 54.000 ) for SS 99% of us could have lived with that. That part of the band is very lightly used except for some psk digi

RE: [digitalradio] Don't ignore proposals/local HF net successes

2006-10-24 Thread John Champa
@yahoogroups.com To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: [digitalradio] Don't ignore proposals/local HF net successes Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 18:30:28 -0500 Bruce, The ARRL is not generally going to ask other groups for input. It would really be a bit unethical if my organization bypasses me and goes to another

Re: [digitalradio] Don't ignore proposals/local HF net successes

2006-10-24 Thread Danny Douglas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 11:12 PM Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Don't ignore proposals/local HF net successes Rick, I have had the same experience here too, especially regarding 6M and 10M bands. Out of the hundreds of Hams in the area, I