Re: [digitalradio] FNpsk

2007-01-29 Thread Jim Orcheson
Walt, Did you try Google? (193 hits) Jim VA3JNO Walt DuBose wrote: Can someone tell me about FNPSK? Thanks 73, Walt/K5YFW

Re: [digitalradio] FNpsk

2007-01-29 Thread Walt DuBose
Jim, Please note some of the 192 hits were from me or too me. None of them address how QPSK63 was eplementation in FNpsk...did it use the originator's code or modify it? Well it did modify it and added an error free capability. What I am looking for is a technical description of FNpsk.

[digitalradio] FNpsk

2007-01-28 Thread Walt DuBose
Can someone tell me about FNPSK? Thanks 73, Walt/K5YFW

[digitalradio] FNpsk

2005-11-04 Thread Frank Krasnicki
Anybody using FNpsk on a regular basis for emergency comm? I would like to know pros and cons K1CRU Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page

[digitalradio] FNPSK test tonight

2005-06-22 Thread obrienaj
Rick, what message format will you want to use ? I just set-up one using the ARRL format but can do the others if you want. I have one set-up for you. Do you want the 31 or the 63 variety ? Andy K3UK --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew J. O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can

Re: [digitalradio] FNPSK test tonight

2005-06-22 Thread Leigh L Klotz, Jr.
Pawel discussed using parallel decoders and picking the one with the best SNR...it should be fairly easy for programs that already support parallel decoding. If you can spot the bandwidth, though, that gives most of the info, and once the selection of parameters for Olivia settles down, it

Re: Re: [digitalradio] FNPSK test tonight

2005-06-22 Thread Andrew J. O'Brien
: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: [digitalradio] FNPSK test tonight I guess I am confused about passing all these setting etc etc to make a contact. If a digital mode is not capable of simply tuning across, and making a contact without all the extra setting-up jazz, then maybe it needs a lot

Re: [digitalradio] FNPSK test tonight

2005-06-22 Thread Danny Douglas
Right off the bat, I suggest you give others (including when spotting) the exact freq they will see on the waterfall, and not the freq which shows on your rigs readout. It really gets confusing for folk to spot something on 14.071 , 14.070, 14.069 etc. since when we click on that spot,

Re: [digitalradio] FNPSK Success

2005-06-22 Thread Andrew J. O'Brien
- Original Message - From: Andrew J. O'Brien To: carcomm@yahoogroups.com ; NCARC Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 10:56 PM Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] [CARC] Fw: [digitalradio] FNPSK Success - Original Message - From: Rick Williams To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, June 22

RE: [digitalradio] FNPSK Success

2005-06-22 Thread Rick Williams
, 2005 22:09 To: carcomm@yahoogroups.com; NCARC Cc: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] FNPSK Success Thanks for the test Rick . Did SCS announce something new at Friedrichshafen ? I agree that Scamp needs a keyboard component. I am not sure about MFSK16, its been a couple

Re: Re: [digitalradio] FNPSK Success

2005-06-22 Thread Danny Douglas
OK Thanks. The one worry is that it runson all sorts of operating systems. but doesnt list Win 2000. Got it downloaded and will try anyway. Danny The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com Yahoo! Groups Links To