I too do have PACTOR and AMTOR qso's on occasion as well, only time I do use
the mode, not into the pactor mailbox thing too much yet..
Might be me as well.
Fred
CIW649/VE3FAL
CFARS Member
SATERN Member
SATERN Amateur Radio Liaison Officer
DEC Amethyst District ARES
Remember guys, not every
Actually Andy What we are using right now are a
few WinLink frequencies. Why you ask? because
every time we set camp anyplace someone will copy
the CW ID and them the hate email starts. Not to mention
the fact that AEL ran off a large bunch of people that
had been using everything from RTTY to PAC
John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
> At 09:51 AM 2/21/2010, you wrote:
>> Actually John, I am beginning to think that there could be merit in
>> "protecting" some frequencies for certain use . Maybe the PACTOR, WINMOR,
>> PACKET, ALE, PSKMAIL, unattended stations SHOULD get a small slice of
>> spectrum.
At 09:51 AM 2/21/2010, you wrote:
>Actually John, I am beginning to think that there could be merit in
>"protecting" some frequencies for certain use . Maybe the PACTOR, WINMOR,
>PACKET, ALE, PSKMAIL, unattended stations SHOULD get a small slice of
>spectrum.
And for the attended stations?
ruary 21, 2010 8:51 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Protected HF frequencies
Actually John, I am beginning to think that there could be merit in
"protecting" some frequencies for certain use . Maybe
the PACTOR, WINMOR, PACKET, ALE, PSKMAIL, unattended statio
Actually John, I am beginning to think that there could be merit in
"protecting" some frequencies for certain use . Maybe the PACTOR, WINMOR,
PACKET, ALE, PSKMAIL, unattended stations SHOULD get a small slice of spectrum.
They would help in the event of emergencies , and keep the rest of band
