"Are people giving up on other stuff ?"
Let me don my Captain Obvious cape for a moment
No, it is just that there is only small of percentage that will get on
the air and call CQ in the less popular modes consistently and with the
aid of RSID in their xmissions.
If you get on the air and cal
Hi Folks,
Re Mels Post "so these tiddly little sunspots are not really helping us to get
across the pond."
Its 1330 UTC Sat 2 Jan 10.Have been looking around the Bands from here in
Central UK, but cannot report accurately, as I have just erected a 'Homebrew'
Vertical Antenna, which is an u
Dial freqs:
1.838 - BPSK31, OLIVIA, JT65A
1.800 - RTTY, PSK31, OLIVIA
phil de ka1gmn
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Andy obrien wrote:
>
>
> Phil, what frq is a good one to monitor 160 ?
>
> Andy
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Phil Williams wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I think that if you mo
Phil, what frq is a good one to monitor 160 ?
Andy
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Phil Williams wrote:
>
>
> I think that if you monitored 80 meters for 7 days, you would capture other
> modes.
>
> Any chance of monitoring 160 meters?
>
> philw de ka1gmn
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 5:58 AM,
I think that if you monitored 80 meters for 7 days, you would capture other
modes.
Any chance of monitoring 160 meters?
philw de ka1gmn
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 5:58 AM, obrienaj wrote:
>
>
>
>
> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com ,
> "raf3151019" wrote:
> >
> > That's quite a sophisticated s
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "raf3151019" wrote:
>
> That's quite a sophisticated system you've made, very interesting. What is
> also interesting is that the list had only one European station, so these
> tiddly little sunspots are not really helping us to get across the pond.
>
> Ki
