[digitalradio] Re: LOTW Olivia, not a lot !

2007-01-03 Thread mulveyraa2
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Chuck Mayfield - AA5J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > mulveyraa2 wrote: -- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > , Chuck Mayfield - AA5J > > > > > > > You're not reading the error message it gave you. It says that > > "Call si

Re: [digitalradio] Re: LOTW Olivia, not a lot !

2007-01-03 Thread Chuck Mayfield - AA5J
mulveyraa2 wrote: -- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com , Chuck Mayfield - AA5J > > > You're not reading the error message it gave you. It says that > "Call sign, DXCC Entity and QSO date range don't match up". Note the > "and". Your submission indicates that y

[digitalradio] Re: LOTW Olivia, not a lot !

2007-01-03 Thread mulveyraa2
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Chuck Mayfield - AA5J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You are probably right, Danny. However, I neither know nor care what > "DXCC Entity" I am in and I got the following back from the request: > > Processing file 'AA5J.tq5' > > 2007-01-03 03:15:49 Started p

[digitalradio] Re: LOTW Olivia, not a lot !

2007-01-02 Thread Andrew O'Brien
Yes Peter, I do. Andy. > Hope you're sending your LoTW QSL records (ALL of them, not just Olivia) > to hb9bza for his LoTW users database project > (http://www.hb9bza.net/lotw/). > > I find it very helpful when I see a station on the waterfall and I can > tell that they're known to QSL via LoT

[digitalradio] Re: LOTW Olivia, not a lot !

2007-01-02 Thread Andrew O'Brien
> > I think I can understand why. Why does it have to be so complicated to > get a cert with lotw? > > Chuck, aa5j > > PS I am debating whether or not it is more trouble than it is worth, > since I do not chase dx. > Actually, I just re-read that. They were not QSL'd , just QSOs. I