Irvine wrote:
Sorry Roger, This digitalradio group is very helpful to me and I
appreciate all the effort to keep it going. I strongly support
discussion of any OS, software, operating frequencies etc.
I do not see what a discussion about the merits of various operating
systems has to do
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Linux versis Windows: Let the debate begin!!]
Irvine wrote:
Sorry Roger, This digitalradio group is very helpful to me and I
appreciate all the effort to keep it going. I strongly support
discussion of any OS, software, operating frequencies etc
Anybody using Mandrake One the Live CD so you don't have to do the dual boot
route?
73
Brad
N1NPK,_._,___
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 08:28 -0500, Brad Gillis wrote:
Anybody using Mandrake One the Live CD so you don't have to do the
dual boot route?
73
Brad
N1NPK,_._,___
Simon Brown wrote:
- Original Message - From: Roger J. Buffington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:barrister54%40socal.rr.com
I do not see what a discussion about the merits of various
operating systems has to do with digital radio, except
incidentally.
As a developer (mainly
Sorry Roger,
This digitalradio group is very helpful to me and I appreciate
all the effort to keep it going. I strongly support discussion of any
OS, software, operating frequencies etc. It helps us enjoy, and maybe
improve, digital radio. When I don't have time or interest for some
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 17:50 -0800, Leigh L Klotz, Jr. wrote:
This is an interesting point of view, to take it from an economic and
performance tradeoff. If I might ask (if this threa continues), would
you all mind posting your rig and antenna systems as well? It would be
interesting to see
OK Leigh,
Hope this is what you're looking for.
OS LINUX debIAN, etch (testing, release) runing on two laptops, and four
desktop/server machines. since they all run the same OS, they all network
easily and paly nicely with the router.
RIGS HF = Kenwood TS 850 and FT 897 (coupled/controled
Leigh L Klotz, Jr. wrote:
This is an interesting point of view, to take it from an economic and
performance tradeoff. If I might ask (if this threa continues), would
you all mind posting your rig and antenna systems as well? It would be
interesting to see if there is a correlation between
HF setup
I run an Alinco DX-77 with a homebrew interface. KVM cables and old scsi
cables make for great shielded wiring. It's all a bit basic with TX keying
hanging off the back of DB9s plug etc - but it works. Computer is 2.2 GHz P4
with Debian installed from a Knoppix CD, and then updated over
A. Amador
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 1:29 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Linux versis Windows: Let the debate
begin!!
Roger J. Buffington wrote:
No matter what group I join, this Windows v. Linux topic comes up.
If we are not supposed to keep talking about
Walt, I am afraid you would go out of business right quick. Few people who
write for magazines are going to mess with three systems. They do it for
themselves, then publish what they have done. As to commercial software -
you buy it the way it is, or dont.
Danny Douglas N7DC
ex WN5QMX ET2US
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Linux versis Windows: Let the debate
begin!!
Walt, I am afraid you would go out of business right quick. Few people who
write for magazines are going to mess with three systems. They do it for
themselves, then publish what they have
Having just finished experimenting with a dual-boot system, I would
like to add my two cents worth.
In my humble opinion, and if all things were equal, I would choose
LINUX as my OS over Windows in a second. As far as using it for all else
than ham radio, it is superb in most ways.
All people have to do is write in Java or its ilk.
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Danny Douglas
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 10:03 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Linux versis Windows
Roger,
From my perspective (which is probably a bit more liberal than many)
all these things are important and they all certainly directly impact
digital topics.
73,
Rick, KV9U
Roger J. Buffington wrote:
No matter what group I join, this Windows v. Linux topic comes up. If
we are not
Roger J. Buffington wrote:
No matter what group I join, this Windows v. Linux topic comes up.
If we are not supposed to keep talking about the new FCC digital regs
(something of vital interest to most of us digital ops) then we
should be able to dispense with this Linux topic, which has
Jerry W wrote:
Sorry John,
IMHO I do not agree, there is a need for open source OS. Even
Microsoft is buying into Linux with Novel, maybe Bill is afraid, HI
No matter what group I join, this Windows v. Linux topic comes up. If
we are not supposed to keep talking about the new FCC
to howard and the rest ... I only objected to the label cultisT. Linux
is not a religious experience for me. Like everyone else, I started with MS
Windows I just got sick of shelling out money and time. Money I'd
rather invest in rigs and time I'd rather spend on the air. Linux helped me
I believe this Linux topic was a nice break from all the FCC smack
going on. Any new topic is rather refreshing. I also found it rather
informative. Thanks to this discussion, I will be acquiring a new
computer here shortly to experiment with Debian and Suse. Thanks Guys !
Paul Metzger
KQ6WEH
20 matches
Mail list logo
