Re: [digitalradio] Re: New poll for digitalradio

Thanks, John. I think I now know more than I did earlier. Bill-W4BSG John Becker wrote: >My comments should be on line by now or soon. >I told them just what I posted here. > >Since 95% of my digital operation is RTTY the >rest Amtor and Pactor it should be easy to see >what I did like and dislik

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New poll for digitalradio

Rather than trying to bait him, if what he said is so important to you, why don't you go find his comment on the FCC site (that's not difficult) and READ IT ??? I voted to allow this discussion to continue, because despite all the personal attacks, there's been some good information from both s

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New poll for digitalradio

My comments should be on line by now or soon. I told them just what I posted here. Since 95% of my digital operation is RTTY the rest Amtor and Pactor it should be easy to see what I did like and dislike. I did at one time do a little HELL and MT-63 but no longer do that after giving away my inte

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New poll for digitalradio

John-regarding your last sentence- It matters-People DO read what you send. Else- why do you bother? Regarding the question- You were asked what you DID support, and you had said that you had mailed a comment; did you support parts of both sides in that? Bill-W4BSG John Becker wrote: >Ok Bill s

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New poll for digitalradio

Ok Bill since you did not like that, try this. Some parts I do and some parts I don't support. But does it really matter what I think. At 11:18 AM 3/1/06, you wrote: >John- This is NOT an answer to Daves' question. Did you support it or not? >Bill-W4BSG Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New poll for digitalradio

John- This is NOT an answer to Daves' question. Did you support it or not? Bill-W4BSG John Becker wrote: >I like some parts and dislike other parts. > >At 10:45 PM 2/28/06, you wrote: > > >>972, not 927. >> >>Did you support or oppose RM-11306, John? >> >>73, >> >>Dave, AA6YQ >>

[digitalradio] Re: New poll for digitalradio

As with previous dockets, hardcopy (paper) submitals that are part of the offical record are available via ECFS. See for example: and note (a) it is a scan and (b) the presence of the FCC mailroom stamps

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New poll for digitalradio

I was told by my contact at the FCC that the mail in's are not on the site. Just the on line comments. But she did say in her words, "as far as I know" So anyone of us could be wrong. At 07:00 AM 3/1/06, you wrote: >It was my understanding from the FCC site that comments that are >mailed in are s

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New poll for digitalradio

I like some parts and dislike other parts. At 10:45 PM 2/28/06, you wrote: >972, not 927. > >Did you support or oppose RM-11306, John? > > 73, > > Dave, AA6YQ Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://gr

[digitalradio] Re: New poll for digitalradio

It was my understanding from the FCC site that comments that are mailed in are scanned into a computer and posted on the web site along with the on-line comments and file transfer comments. Is that an incorrect reading of the what the site says? tim ab0wr --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, J

[digitalradio] Re: New poll for digitalradio

972, not 927. Did you support or oppose RM-11306, John? 73, Dave, AA6YQ --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At 09:33 PM 2/28/06, you wrote: > >When the FCC solicited comments regarding the establishment of > >remotely-invoked automatic ope

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New poll for digitalradio

to support it. Of those speaking out, according to Dave, 80 percent chose to oppose this, and this speaks for all of us in a big way. Original Message - From: "Dave Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 10:33 PM Subject: [digitalradio]

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New poll for digitalradio

At 09:33 PM 2/28/06, you wrote: >When the FCC solicited comments regarding the establishment of >remotely-invoked automatic operation via 97.221 back in 1995, there >were a total of 19 comments filed. The 972 comments filed for RM- >11306 represents a huge increase. My statistical samples show that

[digitalradio] Re: New poll for digitalradio

When the FCC solicited comments regarding the establishment of remotely-invoked automatic operation via 97.221 back in 1995, there were a total of 19 comments filed. The 972 comments filed for RM- 11306 represents a huge increase. My statistical samples show that no less than 80% of all comments

[digitalradio] Re: New poll for digitalradio

Perhaps those who are in favor of RM-11306 took the wise advice not to "mail bomb" the FCC with comments that all say the same thing. There is only strength in numbers when that strength has a purpose. I personally see no purpose in asking over 5,000 US hams who use "local or automatic control"

[digitalradio] Re: New poll for digitalradio

It is interesting to note that those strongly opposing open discussion here of the impact of remotely-invoked unattended operation on digital mode stations are also those speaking strongly in favor of the expanded use of remotely-invoked unattended operation. Its a bit late for the mushroom s

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New poll for digitalradio

To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 1:50 PM Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New poll for digitalradio I already have an external HDTV tuner, bought for just $87 from Wal-Mart, no HDTV but scanning for digital signals on TV is fun.Andy K3UK

[digitalradio] Re: New poll for digitalradio

I already have an external HDTV tuner, bought for just $87 from Wal- Mart, no HDTV but scanning for digital signals on TV is fun. Andy K3UK Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http:

[digitalradio] Re: New poll for digitalradio

Another option is:   I already have and enjoy HDTV.     It is great, especially the Dolby 5.1 sound and the excellent color registration / detail on video.   de Russ WA3FRP     The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com

[digitalradio] Re: New poll for digitalradio

And another option is that I never watch TV. Tho I do own an analog TV set that I use with DVDs and VHSs and Laser Discs. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yaho