>Not knocking the volunteers for sure. I do have a question. How come
>the money wasn't invested in public safety equipment using public
>safety NTIA assigned frequencies to do the same thing?
the cost involved to purchase
commercial equipment, antennas, peripherals, labor to install, an
Patricia (Elaine) Gibbons wrote:
> It does amaze me to see some members of the amateur radio community
> start whining after public and/or private agencies officially recognize
>
> ***and support*** the value of the amateur radio service during disaster
> response and recovery operations
Elaine,
@ <mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com>
yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of jgorman01
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 11:29 AM
To: digitalradio@ <mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Oregon Governor Allocates $250,000 for Digital
Communications Networ
y 9, 2008 7:47:17 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Oregon Governor Allocates $250,000 for Digital
Communications Network
Does this ever increasing number of government agencies doing this
scare the bejeebers out of anybody. That is, the government buying
permanent infrastructure and someday wanting
Unless the affected Counties have been able to change out or reprogram their
equipment to be able to operate in Narrow Band mode, they can't operate on
those frequencies!
They are designated for Narrow Band operation only!
jgorman01 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Not k
ARES AEC Montgomery County, TX
http://TheHamNetwork.net
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of jgorman01
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 11:29 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Oregon Governor Allocates
o] Re: Oregon Governor Allocates $250,000 for
Digital Communications Network
Jim, and everyone else,
I am the Radio Tech for Clackamas County, Oregon and I KNOW the problems
that the Hams have getting Digital communications going to and from a
disaster scene!
My experience with the ARES uni
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Roger J. Buffington
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 10:18 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Oregon Governor Allocates $250,000 for
Digital Communications
Not knocking the volunteers for sure. I do have a question. How come
the money wasn't invested in public safety equipment using public
safety NTIA assigned frequencies to do the same thing? These don't
require ham licenses to operate and could expand the resource pool of
operators. As a taxpayer
Jim, and everyone else,
I am the Radio Tech for Clackamas County, Oregon and I KNOW the problems that
the Hams have getting Digital communications going to and from a disaster scene!
My experience with the ARES units in Oregon and our local County OEM is that
the equipment that they,
Roger J. Buffington wrote:
> John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
>
>
>> Maybe all would be well if the word "WinLink" had not been used.
>>
>
> Probably. Other forms of amateur communication listen before they
> transmit, thereby preventing unnecessary QRM.
>
>
>
Please, can we not go round thi
John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
> Maybe all would be well if the word "WinLink" had not been used.
Probably. Other forms of amateur communication listen before they
transmit, thereby preventing unnecessary QRM.
de Roger W6VZV
Here is Missouri we have 114 counties plus the city of St. Louis.
Each and ever county plus the city of St. Louis puts money into
their EOC. I know of none that does not have ham equipment.
And has been doing so for many many years.
Would that be any thing like you what your talking about?
Maybe a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Another point to consider is that the Government Employee who will be
> operating this equipment is maintaining (and will probably continue
> to maintain) and average age south of 40 years old. The same cannot
> be said for the Amateur Radio community who is letting
L PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Roger J. Buffington
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 9:48 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Oregon Governor Allocates $250,000 for
Digital Communications Network
jgorman01 wrote:
>
> Does this ever increasing number of governmen
jgorman01 wrote:
>
> Does this ever increasing number of government agencies doing this
> scare the bejeebers out of anybody. That is, the government buying
> permanent infrastructure and someday wanting a return on investment,
> like using it to augment regular communications?
>
> Jim WA0LYK
Does this ever increasing number of government agencies doing this
scare the bejeebers out of anybody. That is, the government buying
permanent infrastructure and someday wanting a return on investment,
like using it to augment regular communications?
Jim
WA0LYK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.c
17 matches
Mail list logo