Re: [digitalradio] Should some digital modes be considered obsolete?

2006-01-30 Thread John Bradley
on 14107.5   John VE5MU - Original Message - From: KV9U To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 4:19 PM Subject: [digitalradio] Should some digital modes be considered obsolete? While I have used MFSK16 a lot in the past, it seems that

Re: [digitalradio] Should some digital modes be considered obsolete?

2006-01-30 Thread Patrick Lindecker
a bit better... 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: "KV9U" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 11:19 PM Subject: [digitalradio] Should some digital modes be considered obsolete? > While I have used MFSK16 a lot in the past, it seems that Olivia

Re: [digitalradio] Should some digital modes be considered obsolete?

2006-01-30 Thread w4lde
% copy on the other end while he could not get any copy on several other modes we tried, had to go up to 50 watts to get copy during the test. Ron W4LDE - Original Message - From: KV9U <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, January 30, 2006 5:19 pm Subject: [digitalradio] Should some d

Re: [digitalradio] Should some digital modes be considered obsolete?

2006-01-30 Thread Leigh L Klotz, Jr.
I don't think that Olivia supplants MFSK16, if only for the bandwidth. I think the jury is still out on real-world performance as well, but time will tell. Now, DominoEX seems designed by Murray to supplant MFSK16, and that might happen. Of course, PSK63 was supposed to replace RTTY... Leigh

[digitalradio] Should some digital modes be considered obsolete?

2006-01-30 Thread KV9U
While I have used MFSK16 a lot in the past, it seems that Olivia has supplanted it, even though Olivia is often a much wider signal and requires fairly robust settings to equal MFSK16 under difficult conditions. But from what I see on the print, a number of digitally active hams feel that Olivi