It would be difficult to pause without notice with DV due to the latency
issue. This is one of the reasons that I do not expect DV to ever become
all that popular on HF. And if there are attempts to improve the
sensitivity and robustness, the latency would have to become even more
noticeable
At 11:47 AM 5/13/2007, you wrote in part:
This is one of the reasons that I do not expect DV to ever become
all that popular on HF.
It is doing very well at this time.
I had a couple QSO's on 20 meters with WinDRM but allot of QSB made
things difficult. Anyone in the Northeast want to try WinDRM on 160
meters? I am starting to call cq on some nights at 9:00 pm Est. on
1.990. Since the band usually opens up well after sunset it may be a
good place to get a
Here in the northern midwest U.S., we have a great deal of QRN that
begins in the early evening. It is not always easy to maintain
comfortable analog voice communications with 100 watt stations during
the summer months.
When you use 160 what power levels are you running in order to keep the
Couldn't DV include a automated brief pause every
1 or 2 min to check for doubling?
It would be so brief as to be almost indiscernible
to the op and would trigger a warning of some sort
only if doubling (defined by certain parameters)
were detected.
WDYT?
From listening to DV users on the
I don't think it is needed.
I have been on DV for 4 years and have never seen
anyone talk for a min... it just don't happen on DV.
It's just not a long winded mode.
John, W0JAB
At 06:59 PM 5/12/2007, you wrote:
Couldn't DV include a automated brief pause every
1 or 2 min to check for doubling?
