More in a bit. Right now here's a couple links.
> But you know it is not getting traction when you go to a NOS group and find
> that one with 15 members has 11 messages over a four year period of time!
> and the other with 29 members has 25 messages over a 4 year period of time!
The basic JNO
Title: RE: [digitalradio] JNOS and Linux for the digital ham
I am SOOO glad you ask.
The general opinion of government and industry is that most HF operations take place during propagation which when modeled is called a "poor CCIR channel". This takes into considerati
I see the word "robust" used with regard to digital modes quite frequently,
but I do not know what is meant.
Is anyone able (And willing) to define "robust" as it applies to
RF digital modes?
Thanks- Bill
At 08:50 AM 6/16/2005 -0500, you wrote:
>I have a couiple of questions...
>
>I understan
Title: RE: [digitalradio] JNOS and Linux for the digital ham
I have a couiple of questions...
I understand using PSK63 rather thna PSK31 but why not MFSK16 which has been shown to be more robust.
Also, what is the fanisanation with ALE? Do you mean ALE to connect to stations or the ALE
Was just curios the group you mention to check out "aprpack" on yahoo, I
can find it, sounds interesting, and a group that is thinking outside
the box. I'd like to join, please send me the full link to it, please.
Leigh L Klotz, Jr. wrote:
>Check out aprpack Yahoo group...they are doing APRS ov
Check out aprpack Yahoo group...they are doing APRS over PSK63 with CRC
for keyboarding, self-spotting, and messaging. There is also work going
on on Selcal and ALE on the HFLink group.
I am interested in making gMFSK work with the APRS-CRC layer, so we can
experiment with PSK63 and Olivia as
