OK John
You have had your say NOW MINE.
ONE LAST TIME .
I just sent out in MAY 2007 110 QSL cards all worked
on ssb between 50.110 and 50.350 and at 50.400 was a
group of AM boys. this time I had to pass on
working them. 6 IS used if you want a dead band
you need to save 10 me
Whats wrong with it?
Spam problems ?
--- "Leigh L Klotz, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Careful with the free version...
>
http://www.theregister.com/2007/06/05/microsoft_mvp_threats/
> Leigh/WA5ZNU
Bore
Careful with the free version...
http://www.theregister.com/2007/06/05/microsoft_mvp_threats/
Leigh/WA5ZNU
> For free software from Microsoft there is -
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/express/
>
> I have written a lot of software using the free versions, I have now
> purchased the full versio
Kurt wrote:
> Don't know about anyone else, but I am tired of reading the messages
> between some here, and the bs that is passing back and forth.
>
> If you guys want to have a pissing contest, then why not do it with
> emails to each other, or take it to another forum.
>
> Kurt
> K8YZK
>
>
>
>
OK John
You have had your say NOW MINE no rebuttals please..
ONE LAST TIME .
1st when did I EVER state I was a lawyer? As for ill
informed how may receive stations did your 24/7/365
experiment use to show the lack of interference from
your proposed mode ?
ANSWER ONLY ONE and he was pa
--Original Message Follows
From: Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:32:22 -0500
John,
Look at your continued choice of language! You
Dave,
What are you writing about?
Sorry, but I am not leading anything! When I was I used the
approach you suggest. But now I am NOT, so may I have your
permission to speak my mind as I wish?
Also, I am not selling anything either, nor trying to pursuade anybody
of anything. Do it anyway you
John,
Look at your continued choice of language! You just do not have a clue
about leadership or you would never talk like that. You are
intentionally polarizing and increase, rather than decrease opposition
to what you think you are promoting.
Be careful when you start to make claims of what
-
From: Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:39:43 -0500
John,
It is you who are the offensive one. And you have done this a number of
Bruce,
You are just one big lovable DINOSAUR.
Vy 73,
John - K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
Date:
Roger all he cares about is making 6 meters into a
DIGIVIDEO band for his elete 1%
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=39
bruce mallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
> Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 08:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
> --- Skip Teller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
ginal Message Follows
From: bruce mallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 09:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
59.3 to 54.000 is 90% and if it was
Message Follows
> From: bruce mallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on
> New Digi Protocols
> Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 08:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
>
> NO you bett
alradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 08:54:36 -0700
John Champa wrote:
>
> Bruce,
>
> When are you ever going to stop your babling ignorance about wide
> band HSMM on 6
John Champa wrote:
>
> Bruce,
>
> When are you ever going to stop your babling ignorance about wide
> band HSMM on 6-meters?
>
> You are worried about 100 kHz when the band maybe opens in a few
> years out of a 4,000 kHz wide band. Get real! Attach brain to
> keyboard.
>
> I am getting very
You better work on your math, Bruce!
A 100 kHz channel in 4 MHz is only 2.5%
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocol
NO you better get real 1% of all hams do not need 90%
of a band ANY BAND .
8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time
with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
http://tools.search.yahoo.co
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 08:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
--- Skip Teller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce, the center frequency of my skeleton-slot
> d
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 08:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
--- Skip Teller <[EMAIL
--- Skip Teller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce, the center frequency of my skeleton-slot
> design is 144.2 MHz, as it is specifically intended
> for SSB operation.
INTERESTING I could not remember the name it's
been too long but the antenna worked as good as
stacked 7 elm cushcrafts ba
I was wondering what the center frequency was and the
band width THAT'S WHY I ASKED IF IT WAS USABLE ON SSB.
I had 7 over 7 skeleton-slot beams made in England in
the late 1960 and I'm WELL aware of that array.
As for BIG WHEELS had them too a stacked pair and have
given thought to building anoth
lradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
On 6/1/07, Howard Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please consider RealBasic as a tool instead of VB.net. With MS there
> is no such thing as 'free' or 'cross platform". With Rea
11:48:34 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
- Original Message -
From: "Howard Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Please consider RealBasic as a tool instead of VB.net. With MS there
> is no
On 6/1/07, Howard Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please consider RealBasic as a tool instead of VB.net. With MS there
> is no such thing as 'free' or 'cross platform". With RealBasic you can
> code cross platform and there is no charge for the Linux version.
Howard,
Actually, with the .NET
- Original Message -
From: "Howard Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Please consider RealBasic as a tool instead of VB.net. With MS there
> is no such thing as 'free' or 'cross platform".
For free software from Microsoft there is -
http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/express/
I have written
--- Skip KH6TY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"There will be a QST constructions article in coming
months for a horizontally- polarized 2m antenna that
equals the performance of a 5-element beam,"
Usable on SSB ... ??
I have worked New York state from tampabay on USB
with stacked ku4ab squail
Skip,
Sounds really interesting. Isn't much of this is available right now
with Linux, on PSKmail? However it is not available on MS Windows OS
which is what 95+% of hams use worldwide for now. It would seem that
adoption will be low until we have cross platform capability.
My experience with
28 matches
Mail list logo
