RE: [digitalradio] WinDRM and new USA rules?

2006-10-13 Thread John Gleichweit
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of kd4e Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 8:42 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] WinDRM and new USA rules? Hey, what would they call a picture of a data file? -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version

RE: [digitalradio] WinDRM and new USA rules?

2006-10-13 Thread DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] WinDRM and new USA rules? You can use WinDRM to transmit digital voice and images in the Phone/Image subbbands. You can use WinDRM to transmit data in the RTTY/Data subbands. I don't quite understand Mark's point about using data

Re: [digitalradio] WinDRM and new USA rules?

2006-10-13 Thread KV9U
Many years ago, Peter, TY1PS sent a compressed audio file from Benin to the USA and it could have been the first digital file of this type. This was done on Clover II since for a short time this was a popular digital mode with the Winlink system (not the same as the internet/ham radio

Re: [digitalradio] WinDRM and new USA rules?

2006-10-13 Thread Danny Douglas
. moderator [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: KV9U [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 11:50 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] WinDRM and new USA rules? Many years ago, Peter, TY1PS sent a compressed audio file from Benin to the USA

Re: [digitalradio] WinDRM and new USA rules?

2006-10-12 Thread Mark Miller
I'm not so sure of that. As I understand it, D means telemetry or telecommand. D - Data transmission, telemetry, telecommand No I am not out to banish Pactor III, but I am wondering why the FCC included J2D in the list of 500Hz maximum occupied bandwidth modes. 73, Mark N5RFX Need a

Re: [digitalradio] WinDRM and new USA rules?

2006-10-12 Thread John Champa
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] WinDRM and new USA rules? Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 23:42:14 -0400 Hey, what would they call a picture of a data file? :-) Seems we are putting too fine a point on things. For emergency communications purposes we *need* to have tested and implemented non-proprietary