Re: [Discuss] can you copyright an API?

2012-04-25 Thread Mark Woodward
On 04/25/2012 07:41 AM, Jerry Feldman wrote: On 04/24/2012 08:13 PM, Richard Pieri wrote: On Apr 24, 2012, at 6:15 PM, Derek Martin wrote: I'm not sure what's left that could possibly prevent the GPL from saving the day. Google claims that Dalvik is a clean-room implementation, not GPL. But,

Re: [Discuss] iscsitarget

2012-05-01 Thread Mark Woodward
On 04/30/2012 11:22 PM, Matthew Kowalski wrote: I'm playing with Ubuntu 12.04 LTS and iscsitarget with a Windows 7 initiator. I was able to create a 20GB file with: dd if=/dev/zero of=lun1.img bs=1024k count=2 I can then mount that iSCSI target on my Windows 7 machine and see an unallocate

Re: [Discuss] More Fun in ZFSland

2012-05-16 Thread Mark Woodward
On 05/16/2012 04:41 PM, Richard Pieri wrote: Richard, I read this and say to myself, this sounds more like you want to solve a problem with ZFS instead of wanting to solve a problem the best way possible. If you want to do it with ZFS because you think you can, then cool, have fun. If you wa

Re: [Discuss] US Navy buys Linux to guide drone fleet

2012-06-11 Thread Mark Woodward
On 06/11/2012 07:40 AM, Jerry Feldman wrote: On 06/10/2012 09:59 PM, Jack Coats wrote: Somehow I don't think you are very off base. They need a 'standard OS' that they can have some belief that they can understand, without 'hidden source', and unknown, un-reviewed (by outside eyes), updates,

[Discuss] Class action against "Secure Boot"

2012-06-22 Thread Mark Woodward
I was thinking, if Microsoft gets its way, it will use what's left of its monopoly power to restrict access to the PC boot infrastructure. In principal I have no problem with a secure boot system, as long as I have control over what *I* allow to boot. The problem is when *I* have to ask or pay

[Discuss] [OT] Retailers going out of business

2012-06-25 Thread Mark Woodward
I just had one of those experiences I wanted to buy a computer/HDMI projector. I kind of wanted it today because I'm on vacation and want to toy around with it. Needless to say, I looked around. I looked at staples, best buy and Microcenter. My son and I went to Best Buy first, saw one "on

[Discuss] [semi-OT] "Right to Own" law

2012-06-27 Thread Mark Woodward
We've heard the ads on the radio for and against the "Right to Repair" law. This is a law that is intended to require automobile manufacturers to publish the technical specifications and the codes that the computers in your car produce for troubleshooting and repair. I was thinking, what about

Re: [Discuss] [semi-OT] "Right to Own" law

2012-06-27 Thread Mark Woodward
Masquerade aVST ** On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Mark Woodward <mailto:ma...@mohawksoft.com>> wrote: We've heard the ads on the radio for and against the "Right to Repair" law. This is a law that is intended to require automobile manufacturers to p

Re: [Discuss] [semi-OT] "Right to Own" law

2012-06-27 Thread Mark Woodward
ented. ** **Drew Van Zandt** **Artisan's Asylum Craft Lead, Electronics & Robotics Cam # US2010035593 (**M:**Liam Hopkins **R:**Bastian Rotgeld) **Domain Coordinator, MA-003-D. Masquerade aVST ** On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Mark Woodward <mailto:ma...@mohawksoft

Re: [Discuss] Agile software for a nacent project

2012-07-12 Thread Mark Woodward
On 07/12/2012 12:16 PM, Doug wrote: I think "agile" development is probably the most abusive management technique ever devised. Sure, aspects of it are good software development processes, but the implementation is pretty exploitive, in my opinion. Every "agile" environment I have seen works t

Re: [Discuss] Agile software for a nacent project

2012-07-12 Thread Mark Woodward
On 07/12/2012 09:52 PM, David Kramer wrote: On 07/12/2012 12:53 PM, Mark Woodward wrote: I think "agile" development is probably the most abusive management technique ever devised. Sure, aspects of it are good software development processes, but the implementation is pretty exploit

Re: [Discuss] Agile software for a nacent project

2012-07-12 Thread Mark Woodward
On 07/12/2012 09:52 PM, David Kramer wrote: Mark, we've had had this conversation before, and you have met me, so I can safely say you're lying. I want to add another note. There are a lot of companies in this industry and a number of them are genuinely good places to work. The majority of co

[Discuss] Agile Programming OT?

2012-07-14 Thread Mark Woodward
We sort of had a little dust-up about agile programming techniques. Ruffled feathers and I hope no hurt feelings. Hop on over to Slashdot http://developers.slashdot.org/story/12/07/14/1242237/new-analyst-report-calls-agile-a-scam-says-its-an-easy-out-for-lazy-devs Ignore the article, but the use

Re: [Discuss] i <3 postgresql vid

2012-07-21 Thread Mark Woodward
PostgreSQL is one of the greatest open source projects. As a database, it is my default choice. In fact, unless there is a really strong reason to choose something else, PostgreSQL is what you use. My choices typically are this: small zero configuration, sqlite. shared database postgresql. Or

[Discuss] Interesting work in the industry?

2012-07-22 Thread Mark Woodward
While I am currently employed at a pretty good company, I am constantly getting recruitment emails. And they are all the same basic things, java web sites or internet security. Isn't *anyone* doing anything interesting anymore? ___ Discuss mailing lis

Re: [Discuss] Rob Conery's critique of MySQL?

2012-07-22 Thread Mark Woodward
On 07/22/2012 02:34 PM, Rich Braun wrote: Greg Rundelett wrote: A default installation of MySQL is dangerously too flexible to be trusted with enterprise data. At #185 on the Fortune 500 list, I'm thinking that my current employer's systems probably contain what can be called "enterprise data".

Re: [Discuss] Rob Conery's critique of MySQL?

2012-07-22 Thread Mark Woodward
On 07/22/2012 12:44 PM, Rich Braun wrote: For those of us lacking a 57-minute attention span to watch a full-length talk, what's the gist of Rob Conery's argument? For many, I suppose PostgreSQL is a "default choice" but that isn't the case for most of the open-source tools I've used in the past

Re: [Discuss] Oracle Linux, going after CentOs

2012-07-23 Thread Mark Woodward
On 07/23/2012 01:07 PM, Guy Gold wrote: They don't really leave much room for questions :) http://linux.oracle.com/switch/centos/ (I am , in no way, affiliated with Oracle) I *always* disregard claims when no effort is attempted at substantiating them. ___

Re: [Discuss] Oracle Linux, going after CentOs

2012-07-24 Thread Mark Woodward
On 07/24/2012 11:46 AM, Richard Pieri wrote: On 7/24/2012 10:08 AM, Matthew Gillen wrote: They're not really building their own distro. They are doing what CentOS does, namely distributing a rebranded RHEL. Oracle is selling support for a rebranded RHEL. Everything Oracle does has one purpos

Re: [Discuss] Oracle Linux, going after CentOs

2012-07-25 Thread Mark Woodward
On 07/24/2012 10:01 PM, Richard Pieri wrote: Oracle killing Red Hat makes even less sense than Oracle buying Red Hat. Seriously, what would Larry Ellison gain from it? Nothing. He already has a software stack. He already has RHEL with the trademarks rasped away. A strong Red Hat makes for

[Discuss] Fighting UEFI

2012-07-28 Thread Mark Woodward
As you may or may not know, UEFI is a new boot loader that will make a common PC more like a game console when it comes to freedom of choice. Hardware has very thin margins, if enough people buy UEFI, open it, and try to install Ubuntu, and fail, and return it. It will increase their cost. t w

Re: [Discuss] Fighting UEFI

2012-07-28 Thread Mark Woodward
rs don't amount to much and the "loss" would be negligible. If we make increase their costs and create the perception that a larger segment of customers find this unacceptable, they will question their policies. Nothing makes a point better than the bottom line. On Sat, Jul 28,

Re: [Discuss] Rob Conery's critique of MySQL?

2012-07-30 Thread Mark Woodward
On 07/30/2012 05:28 PM, Derek Atkins wrote: Mark Woodward writes: That being said, my personal opinion is that *anyone* who chooses MySQL without a clear and present "Only MySQL will with our apps" requirement, is not much of a DBA and a terrible engineer. This sounds like a

Re: [Discuss] Rob Conery's critique of MySQL?

2012-07-31 Thread Mark Woodward
On 07/30/2012 05:28 PM, Derek Atkins wrote: Sure, and there's a lot to be said for using tools with which you are comfortable. Like everything, it's a tool. The key is using the right tool for the job. Just because you need an RDBMS does NOT imply that PG is *the* right tool. It is *a* right to

Re: [Discuss] Rob Conery's critique of MySQL?

2012-07-31 Thread Mark Woodward
On 07/31/2012 02:03 PM, Derek Atkins wrote: Mark Woodward writes: On 07/30/2012 05:28 PM, Derek Atkins wrote: Sure, and there's a lot to be said for using tools with which you are comfortable. Like everything, it's a tool. The key is using the right tool for the job. Just because y

Re: [Discuss] Rob Conery's critique of MySQL?

2012-08-01 Thread Mark Woodward
On 07/31/2012 01:34 PM, Rich Braun wrote: Mark Woodward wrote: Well, with MySQL, "create index" and "drop index" LOCK the tables as they are operating. LOCK THE TABLES. Think about that. In PostgreSQL, Oracle, and any "real" database, "create index" and

Re: [Discuss] Rob Conery's critique of MySQL?

2012-08-01 Thread Mark Woodward
On 08/01/2012 08:36 PM, Richard Pieri wrote: Mark, In my opinion, the problem with MySQL is not that it locks tables. It's that it has tables. Oh no! Don't buy in to the No-SQL nonsense. A table is nothing more than a naming convention of the technique of storing related data in the same lo

Re: [Discuss] Rob Conery's critique of MySQL?

2012-08-01 Thread Mark Woodward
On 08/01/2012 11:09 PM, Richard Pieri wrote: On 8/1/2012 9:12 PM, Mark Woodward wrote: Oh no! Don't buy in to the No-SQL nonsense. I'm not. NoSQL is a buzzword for a class of high-performance non-relational database designs. It's not the only non-relational philosophy out

Re: [Discuss] Rob Conery's critique of MySQL?

2012-08-02 Thread Mark Woodward
On 08/02/2012 12:02 PM, Richard Pieri wrote: On 8/1/2012 11:33 PM, Mark Woodward wrote: This is quite wrong. Seriously. If it is a simple "select * from table where val = 'foo;" Then, if there is no index, it will be a table scan. If you execute "create index table_val on t

Re: [Discuss] Rob Conery's critique of MySQL?

2012-08-02 Thread Mark Woodward
On 08/02/2012 03:46 PM, Richard Pieri wrote: On 8/2/2012 12:50 PM, Mark Woodward wrote: This is incorrect. No system with more than one of anything can consistently get O(1). There has to be some way of getting a specific I'll touch on this point down below. That is your opinion, yo

Re: [Discuss] Rob Conery's critique of MySQL?

2012-08-02 Thread Mark Woodward
On 08/02/2012 08:44 PM, Richard Pieri wrote: On 8/2/2012 4:36 PM, Mark Woodward wrote: Not to be snide, but 8 million is not a big number. That's 8 million patients. Multiply that by everything that the VA has on each and every one of them and you get a very large data set. It'

Re: [Discuss] Open source, apps, and money

2012-08-03 Thread Mark Woodward
On 08/03/2012 01:45 PM, Doug wrote: Once there is 1) money and 2) more than one person, things would appear to get so much more complicated. Say one guy contributed one little block of code one time and leaves. Said code is then part of every subsequent release. Along with README and changelog

[Discuss] Big Data obsession

2012-08-04 Thread Mark Woodward
In our drawn out discussion about databases, and most discussions about databases this happens as well, the subject of HUGE scalability was trotted out. Now I am by no means dismissing "big data" as a real problem. Seriously, I worked on some pretty large systems -- hundreds of servers. It is a

Re: [Discuss] Rob Conery's critique of MySQL?

2012-08-04 Thread Mark Woodward
On 08/04/2012 01:50 PM, Rich Braun wrote: Mark Woodward observed: My favorite example is facebook. Yes, they are a big data show case. OMFG they have a lot of data and a lot of computational requirements. They did not start out dreaming of big data. It started small and grew. I believe that

[Discuss] GnomeOS

2012-08-08 Thread Mark Woodward
An interesting move over at Gnome. They've announced "GnomeOS" Ubuntu is going to drop Gnome as the primary desktop, as is Debian, and a couple others I believe. Because of this there was a lot of speculation as to whether Gnome was even relevant. Does this help or hurt Gnome? (Does it matter

Re: [Discuss] suggestions on how to free code?

2012-08-14 Thread Mark Woodward
On 08/13/2012 10:30 PM, Eric Chadbourne wrote: Hi All, Making code GPL is easy. Putting it on an open version control (github, sourceforge, etc)is easy. In short the "mechanics" of what you want to do is easy and well documented. Two things in your email suggest it won't get a lot of follow

Re: [Discuss] Yet Another Laptop Recommendation Thread

2012-09-30 Thread Mark Woodward
I just got a Dell Inspiron i15R with an Intel i7, 8g RAM, 1T disk, usb3, wirelesss-N, HDMI, USB3, WebCam, and DVD+/-RW at Microcenter, I haven't plugged in the HDMI jack yet (I should do that soon), the install went flawless. No drivers, no weirdness, just worked with Ubuntu 12.04 On 09/29/201

[Discuss] Looking for some good people at my company

2012-10-04 Thread Mark Woodward
We need some good people. (1) We need a Linux configuration guru to build and test kernels, package software in RPMS (or debs), work with PAM modules, code in perl, python, and C. You would really really need to be able to roll your own system upgrade. The interview process is tough, and you n

[Discuss] OT Volunteering for School Presentations

2012-10-23 Thread Mark Woodward
I just did a presentation at my daughters 1st grade class. It was about my career in computer science and technology. I brought the robot, because lets face it, all performances are improved by props. The kids were REALLY excited about it. Most questions were kiddish, of course, but there were

[Discuss] Robotic arms controllable from Linux

2012-11-01 Thread Mark Woodward
I'm looking for a robotic arm that can be controlled via Linux or Arduino. Cheap but not a tow. There is one out there that litters my google results but it is not really usable as anything but a toy. It costs about $50 and sold under a few different names. Anyone have know of any? ___

[Discuss] OT Rant/Discussion C vs C++

2012-12-15 Thread Mark Woodward
I started programming back in the 1970s. When I learned C, C was a new language. ANSI C was a big thing and we had to "port" to ANSI C because various vendors implemented vagueness in the C syntax differently. Those of us who understood portability between C compilers fared better. Anyway, when

Re: [Discuss] How do Linux guys back up Windows?

2012-12-27 Thread Mark Woodward
A little humor Q: How do Linux guys back up Windows? A: Real Linux guys install Linux over Windows. On 12/26/2012 07:43 PM, David Kramer wrote: I am now in the odd situation of having two computers that are dual boot, and that I use under Windows more than I have in the past (which is to sa

Re: [Discuss] How do Linux guys back up Windows?

2012-12-27 Thread Mark Woodward
Backing up Windows has gotten more and more problematic over time. (1) The OS keys itself to the physical system (2) The "system" software maintains too much information about the application software. (3) Software can not be generally be run on a system in which it was not explicitly installed

Re: [Discuss] Travelling abroad & taking technology

2012-12-31 Thread Mark Woodward
What am I missing? Why can't you FedEx it? On 12/31/2012 10:36 AM, Matt Shields wrote: I have buildout a datacenter in London in January and I've ordered everything I need directly to the datacenter because of everything I've heard about dealing with customs. The only exception of a single piec

Re: [Discuss] Travelling abroad & taking technology

2012-12-31 Thread Mark Woodward
On 12/31/2012 12:03 PM, Matt Shields wrote: On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Mark Woodward <mailto:ma...@mohawksoft.com>> wrote: What am I missing? Why can't you FedEx it? On 12/31/2012 10:36 AM, Matt Shields wrote: I have buildout a datacenter in London in Ja

[Discuss] Home NAS redux

2012-12-31 Thread Mark Woodward
I have a D-Link DNS-321, its OK as a backup system. Its small and energy efficient, all that nice stuff, but with drive mirroring, it is SLOW as a dog, and a slow dog at that. 5~10 megabyte per second over 1gb ethernet is painful. I'm considering software raid 5, 3x2TB disks to put me at 4TB o

Re: [Discuss] Home NAS redux

2012-12-31 Thread Mark Woodward
On 12/31/2012 10:43 PM, Tom Metro wrote: Mark Woodward wrote: I sort of like having a web interface to the DLINK-321, are there any similar projects for Linux? Not a lot of choices: Openfiler (CentOS based) http://www.openfiler.com/ NASLite (commercial) http://www.serverelements.com/ though

Re: [Discuss] Home NAS redux

2013-01-01 Thread Mark Woodward
On 01/01/2013 08:23 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (blu) wrote: From: discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org [mailto:discuss- bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org] On Behalf Of Mark Woodward I do not wish to use zfs for license issues. This just means you haven't thought about it. There is no pos

Re: [Discuss] Home NAS redux

2013-01-02 Thread Mark Woodward
On 01/02/2013 07:30 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (blu) wrote: From: Mark Woodward [mailto:ma...@mohawksoft.com] (talking about CDDL) Well, I personally dislike the lack of freedom in the license and the fact that I can't, according to the license, create a proper kernel module. It has to be used

Re: [Discuss] Home NAS redux

2013-01-02 Thread Mark Woodward
On 01/02/2013 02:42 PM, Rich Pieri wrote: On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 08:42:42 -0500 Mark Woodward wrote: The GPL is more free than other licenses because it keeps you from denying the freedom that allows you to succeed from others. The freedom to deny freedom is not a freedom. The GPL is more

Re: [Discuss] Home NAS redux

2013-01-02 Thread Mark Woodward
On 01/02/2013 04:25 PM, Rich Pieri wrote: On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:33:30 -0500 Mark Woodward wrote: If you want to use GPL code, you can do *anything* *you* want with it. No, I cannot. The GPL binds software to itself. It is in this way that GPL projects like the Linux kernel have taken from

Re: [Discuss] Home NAS redux

2013-01-03 Thread Mark Woodward
On 01/02/2013 07:59 PM, Rich Pieri wrote: On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:57:39 -0500 Mark Woodward wrote: The BSD license has allowed a great deal of software to be subverted to the detriment of the various BSD projects. This is a perfect example of how the BSD license does not protect your freedom

Re: [Discuss] OSS licenses

2013-01-03 Thread Mark Woodward
On 01/03/2013 10:44 AM, Jerry Feldman wrote: From time to time, we have had speakers on various OpenSource licensing speak at the BLU. The GPL was born because developers were contributing their stuff to the public domain, and some people were grabbing those and copyrighting that code. The origi

Re: [Discuss] Home NAS redux

2013-01-03 Thread Mark Woodward
GPL software. The GPL requires such derivative software to be licensed under the GPL. I don't see a point here. That is the intention of the licenses. So? On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 08:34:24 -0500 Mark Woodward wrote: Well, very little has been "borrowed" from the BSD kernel. I thi

Re: [Discuss] Home NAS redux

2013-01-03 Thread Mark Woodward
On 01/03/2013 12:38 PM, Rich Pieri wrote: I know what I wrote but I do need to correct two of your factual errors. On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:42:12 -0500 Mark Woodward wrote: I'm pretty sure that almost everyone used the original 'BSD TCP/IP stack as a reference. I know Windows'

Re: [Discuss] Home NAS redux

2013-01-03 Thread Mark Woodward
On 01/03/2013 01:56 PM, Rich Pieri wrote: On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:10:27 -0500 Mark Woodward wrote: Well, the DOS version of Windows, windows 1.x through Windows ME, didn't have TCP until Windows 3.1(1) (as winsock). The 386 enhanced version, I'm not sure where that was implemented

Re: [Discuss] Home NAS redux

2013-01-03 Thread Mark Woodward
On 01/03/2013 03:35 PM, Rich Pieri wrote: On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 14:40:31 -0500 Mark Woodward wrote: "Now, some of Spider's code (possibly all of it) was based on the TCP/IP stack in the BSD flavors of Unix. I've seen that article. It is mistaken. Spider couldn't have taken

Re: [Discuss] Home NAS redux

2013-01-07 Thread Mark Woodward
On 01/07/2013 10:15 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (blu) wrote: From: Mark Woodward [mailto:ma...@mohawksoft.com] I acknowledge and understand that there are pros and cons of both licenses, philosophically and materially. I'm not saying one license is better than another, as a generalization; alt

Re: [Discuss] OSS licenses (was Home NAS redux)

2013-01-07 Thread Mark Woodward
On 01/07/2013 02:19 PM, Derek Martin wrote: On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 10:36:36AM -0500, Mark Woodward wrote: On 01/07/2013 10:15 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (blu) wrote: Let's get this clear, it is not "less restrictive" in the long term view. Yes it is, but it depends on your perspect

Re: [Discuss] OSS licenses (was Home NAS redux)

2013-01-09 Thread Mark Woodward
On 01/09/2013 07:13 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (blu) wrote: From: discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org [mailto:discuss- bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org] On Behalf Of John Abreau Under democracy, citizens are prohibited from seizing power by force and imposing a military dictatorship on their f

Re: [Discuss] OSS licenses (was Home NAS redux)

2013-01-09 Thread Mark Woodward
On 01/09/2013 11:43 AM, Rich Pieri wrote: Freedom is the state of being without restrictions. That largely depends on your view of society as a whole. Totally unrestrained "freedom" is not possible in populations greater than 1. Oliver Wendel Holmes, Jr quipped "The right to swing my fists e

Re: [Discuss] OSS licenses (was Home NAS redux)

2013-01-10 Thread Mark Woodward
On 01/09/2013 12:09 PM, Rich Pieri wrote: On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 11:57:37 -0500 Mark Woodward wrote: That largely depends on your view of society as a whole. Totally unrestrained "freedom" is not possible in populations greater than 1. Oliver Wendel Holmes, Jr quipped "The ri

Re: [Discuss] OSS licenses (was Home NAS redux)

2013-01-10 Thread Mark Woodward
On 01/09/2013 07:39 PM, Edward Ned Harvey (blu) wrote: From: Mark Woodward [mailto:ma...@mohawksoft.com] The freedom to deny freedom is NOT a freedom. By combining the FREE software with NON-FREE software you can create NON-FREE software. This does not protect FREE software. This is not a

[Discuss] Its not possible to make things easier for users

2013-01-12 Thread Mark Woodward
I have always been the tech guru. Running the film projector in the early 1970s in school because the teachers never understood how. Many of us have an innate ability to understand mechanisms. We see things and they make sense to us. So, I have used Windows, Macintosh, Linux, FreeBSD, SunOS, C

Re: [Discuss] Its not possible to make things easier for users

2013-01-13 Thread Mark Woodward
On 01/13/2013 12:52 PM, Rich Pieri wrote: On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 14:55:26 -0500 Mark Woodward wrote: Problems with computers are mostly over at this point. It isn't about computers at all. It is about the tasks the users want to accomplish. You can't make them easier without changing

Re: [Discuss] Its not possible to make things easier for users

2013-01-14 Thread Mark Woodward
On 01/14/2013 11:47 AM, Rich Pieri wrote: On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 09:41:26 -0500 Matthew Gillen wrote: I don't think that's quite right. It's not that people don't want choices, it's that they don't want to make choices where they don't understand the options, and there is a high learning curve (

Re: [Discuss] Its not possible to make things easier for users

2013-01-14 Thread Mark Woodward
On 01/14/2013 03:09 PM, Rich Pieri wrote: On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:47:24 -0600 Derek Martin wrote: Only the base (V6) does. Every other model of Mustang (GT, Boss, Shelby) require premium gas. Even the Shelby will run fine with 87 octane. It won't knock if the engine sensors are working proper

Re: [Discuss] Its not possible to make things easier for users

2013-01-14 Thread Mark Woodward
On 01/14/2013 03:50 PM, Daniel C. wrote: On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Mark Woodward wrote: This is exactly why you can't help users. User's do not know what they do not know and somehow expect the world to take care of them. Even Apple is getting spanked for being too simple. M

Re: [Discuss] Its not possible to make things easier for users

2013-01-14 Thread Mark Woodward
On 01/14/2013 04:00 PM, Rich Pieri wrote: On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 15:35:02 -0500 Mark Woodward wrote: It should be noted that "knock sensors" detect a gas detonation and cause the control system to retard the engine timing. Two things about this: The detonation damages the engine

Re: [Discuss] Its not possible to make things easier for users

2013-01-14 Thread Mark Woodward
On 01/14/2013 05:39 PM, Shirley Márquez Dúlcey wrote: On modern cars there is no timing that a mechanic can adjust; that's a throwback to the days of carburetors and camshafts. Nowadays cars have electronic fuel injection and electronically controlled valves and the timing is all done by the engi

Re: [Discuss] Its not possible to make things easier for users

2013-01-14 Thread Mark Woodward
On 01/14/2013 08:47 PM, Derek Martin wrote: On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 06:21:59PM -0500, Rich Pieri wrote: On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:39:10 -0500 Shirley Márquez Dúlcey wrote: The catch is that this may cause a severe performance drop in an engine designed for high octane fuel, not the mere 10HP tha

[Discuss] [OT] Dumbing down of the population

2013-01-15 Thread Mark Woodward
A couple conversations have touched upon this, tangentially perhaps, but I think it is important. When I was a kid, my dad said to me, as I imagine many working class fathers said to their sons of this particular generation, "You have to be rich enough to pay someone or smart enough to do it y

Re: [Discuss] Its not possible to make things easier for users

2013-01-15 Thread Mark Woodward
On 01/15/2013 09:08 AM, Kent Borg wrote: A trio of late-in-the-thread observations: - There is a trade-off between simple and powerful, but one can always make both worse by adding a serving of "stupid", conversely, one can always make something both simpler *and* more powerful by removing s

[Discuss] webmin

2013-01-24 Thread Mark Woodward
I am setting up a server for a fairly technical guy, not a admin level guy, but a smart kid that can do/figure out most tasks, and I also trust that he has the temperament to recognize and call me before he does anything *bad*. Generally speaking, of course. The webmin package seems to be a ve

Re: [Discuss] webmin

2013-01-24 Thread Mark Woodward
On 01/24/2013 12:32 PM, Edward Ned Harvey (blu) wrote: From: discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org [mailto:discuss- bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org] On Behalf Of Mark Woodward Has anyone used it? Are there better options? How's the security? General opinions? Webmin is to linux as

Re: [Discuss] webmin

2013-01-24 Thread Mark Woodward
On 01/24/2013 01:17 PM, Jonathan M. Prigot wrote: Any GUI is going to abstract you from the underlying system. (For a good treatise on this, check out "In the Beginning Was the Command Line" by Neal Stephenson.) I prefer the use of the CLI because it gets me close to the subsystems. The price is

[Discuss] Free Mail Server

2013-02-06 Thread Mark Woodward
Does anyone know of a free SMTP server that isn't in a black hole? ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

[Discuss] [OT] Smart Phones

2013-03-01 Thread Mark Woodward
I think I was the last human being above the age of 16 to get a smart phone. Android, of course. I think the people who claim that they are "life changing" are using more than a bit of hyperbole. As I think about it, it really isn't a "phone" so much as a wireless personal computer that happens

Upgrade a CVS server to something else?

2010-12-13 Thread Mark Woodward
I'm almost embarrassed to say this, but I have my source code in a CVS repository. OK, it is mainly just me, but occasionally, I have other collaborators. It has been in service on the same ip address for over a decade. The machines may have changed, but the repository has not. Seriously, I n

Backup software

2010-12-17 Thread Mark Woodward
While I've got some free time on my hands, I decided to start work on a project. At its core, it is very much like a standard backup system. What makes it different from a regular backup is what you do with the data retrieved after the backup. I know it is a long shot or even a fools errand to

Re: Backup software

2010-12-18 Thread Mark Woodward
full system backup. It is concerned more with backing up information than it is backing up systems. Does that make sense? > > --Chris > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Mark Woodward <mailto:ma...@mohawksoft.com>> wrote: > > While I've got some free time on my hands

Re: Backup software

2010-12-18 Thread Mark Woodward
On 12/17/2010 08:44 AM, Matt Shields wrote: > > > The ability for it to work not only through it's native communication > method (usually custom port/protocol), but also be able to run over an > SSH tunnel. Sometimes you don't want to open up that port to the > outside world even if it is encry

Re: Backup software

2010-12-18 Thread Mark Woodward
On 12/17/2010 09:46 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: >> From: discuss-boun...@blu.org [mailto:discuss-boun...@blu.org] On Behalf >> Of Mark Woodward >> >> My question for you guys is what do you *want* in a backup. We've all >> used these feature laden things

Re: Backup software

2010-12-19 Thread Mark Woodward
On 12/18/2010 11:55 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: >> From: Mark Woodward [mailto:ma...@mohawksoft.com] >> >> The permissions to keep Jane from reading tarzan's files is an >> interesting one. Its obvious when said, but didn't occur to me. It's a >>

So little actual software development in software engineering roles

2011-01-09 Thread Mark Woodward
I have been looking around for positions having had my last project canceled. I'm so tired, it seems like "software development" is more "software integration" these days. Maybe I'm old and washed up. I don't know, but jeez, I LOVE writing software. I mean, I love it. Problems wake me up in the

Embeded PHP/WEB/SQL program, was Re: So little actual software development in software

2011-01-10 Thread Mark Woodward
software development which would have taking maybe several >> > months of two to 3 guys who know how to code complete. Is it just a >> > question of organizing such a group and advertising the groups >> > services? >> > >> > On 01/09/2011 11:01

Software development models, pair programming, agile, team rooms, etc.

2011-01-13 Thread Mark Woodward
I went on an interview at FluidNet, and while I was very impressed with what they are doing, and I liked the VP, I had to bow out of the process because they had one big team room and practiced pair programming. I just got out of a miserable experience with a !Agile process with team rooms. I k

Hardware Hacking

2011-01-22 Thread Mark Woodward
I took a look at the hardware hacking list, it seems pretty slim. At the robot presentation, sorry I couldn't demo, next time I'll have an alternate to wireless ethernet just in case, anyway, I made a rah! rah! call to buy an oscilloscope, soldering iron, and "The Art of Electronics." Maybe I'

RE: Looking for advice on where to find software engineers

2011-01-27 Thread Mark Woodward
On 01/27/2011 12:00 PM, discuss-requ...@blu.org wrote: As a software engineer who is currently looking for a good gig, I wish there were "a" place. There isn't. At my last position, I was interviewing people looking for good engineers, and some were good, but management didn't like them, and th

Re: Looking for advice on where to find software engineers

2011-01-28 Thread Mark Woodward
in; > charset=ISO-8859-1 On 01/27/2011 01:01 PM, Mark Woodward wrote: >> > On 01/27/2011 12:00 PM,discuss-requ...@blu.org wrote: >> > >> > As a software engineer who is currently looking for a good gig, I wish >> > there were "a" place. There

LinuxPCRobot vs VGO

2011-02-03 Thread Mark Woodward
http://vgocom.com/ Just saw these guys on Slashdot the other day. Besides being a really slick looking robot, it seems to be little more than the LinuxPCRobot with an Ekiga client. I think I have a demo! ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http:/

Re:Jeopardy / Watson Lecture at MIT

2011-02-08 Thread Mark Woodward
I think I speak for everyone who has a significant other, that February 14th is more or less impossible. (Well, I say impossible, but it goes with the assumption that we would like to keep peace at home and/or in our respective relationships.) Bummer > From: "Kurt Keville" > Subject: Jeopardy /

Re: Re: Re:Jeopardy / Watson Lecture at MIT

2011-02-08 Thread Mark Woodward
huge data sets, the danger is letting that part of our brains atrophy. > > - Original Message - From: "Mark Woodward" > To: "Kurt Keville" > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 2:04 PM > Subject: Re:Jeopardy / Watson Lecture at MIT > > >

Google topper: Linux robotics

2011-02-12 Thread Mark Woodward
This morning, I googled for "linux robotics" and my site, www.linuxpcrobot.org was at the top of the results. Now, I do have an amount of pride in it, for what its worth, but come on now, you'd think Amazon or IBM would be ranked higher. Anyway. Cool. ___

re: drupal on linux?

2011-02-16 Thread Mark Woodward
With Drupal on the top of my head (I just upgraded a couple sites) I can offer some suggestions. Drupal's model is very much database dependent. That is good in some ways but problematic in others. It is difficult, for instance, to change databases from MySQL to PostgreSQL. You more or less ha

Re: drupal on linux?

2011-02-16 Thread Mark Woodward
On 02/16/2011 01:21 PM, Matt Shields wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Mark Woodward <mailto:ma...@mohawksoft.com>> wrote: > > > With Drupal on the top of my head (I just upgraded a couple sites) > I can > offer some suggestions. > > Dru

Re: NAS and media server

2011-03-06 Thread Mark Woodward
On 03/06/2011 12:00 PM, discuss-requ...@blu.org wrote: > From: Rob Hasselbaum > Subject: NAS and media server > To: blug > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Any recommendations for a good (preferably Linux-based) NAS and media server > box for a home network? A

Abusive contracts

2011-03-10 Thread Mark Woodward
Has anyone noticed that contracts are becoming really mean spirited lately? I mean, seriously, some of the ones that I've looked at are just ridiculous. How's this clause: " The Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any such breach or threatened breach will cause irreparable injury to the Co

Network Solutions

2011-03-12 Thread Mark Woodward
How come Godaddy can update your domain records in a matter of minutes but Network Solutions still takes 24~48 hours!?? It frustrating. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Android Tablet

2011-04-05 Thread Mark Woodward
OK, for those of you who attended my robotics talk, you know that I have an aging HP pavilion laptop. I'll probably buy a new laptop soon, but for portable use, I think laptops are too big. I'm looking for a tablet. No, I don't want an iPad. Anyway, does anyone have any experience with any of t

  1   2   >