On 03/28/2014 12:58 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
Jerry Feldman g...@blu.org writes:
When does Hans Reiser get out of jail. The reiserfs was halfway decent.
You clearly didn't care about your data surviving a system crash, did
you?
-derek
No. I backed up my data.
--
Jerry Feldman g...@blu.org
I'm a fan of btree file systems going back to the 1970s. IBM used it on
their mainframes (VSAM) back then.
On 03/28/2014 06:51 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (blu) wrote:
From: aldo albanese [mailto:aldo_alban...@yahoo.com]
At the beginning I was not too
specific about where I would utilize these
Jerry Feldman g...@blu.org writes:
I'm a fan of btree file systems going back to the 1970s. IBM used it on
their mainframes (VSAM) back then.
Funny, I was just reading how Matthew Dillon intends to change from using
btree in Hammer 1 to something else in Hammer 2:
I took a VSAM internals class. It was interesting and super for the day.
It was based on IBMs Virtual Storage Access Method they used to
manage virtual memory, but it expanded and turned into a better alternative
to 'ISAM' Index Storage Access Method that was used for database kinds
of things
Edward Ned Harvey (blu) wrote:
LOL. ;-) ext4 is the most stable and least buggy option available
to you. That's why it is the default for all distributions. Unless
you want to suggest that every distribution maintainer is a bumbling
group of fools.
Going by the currently open bugs list on
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Jerry Feldman g...@blu.org wrote:
On 03/27/2014 07:21 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (blu) wrote:
From: discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org [mailto:discuss-
bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org] On Behalf Of Tom Metro
Richard Pieri wrote:
...ext4...is...a poor
ma...@mohawksoft.com wrote:
I wouldn't touch EXT[N] for anything but a system partition.
Can you elaborate on your reasons?
XFS or JFS is almost a coin toss, but XFS seems like it is more active.
Back in 2006 when I set up a MythTV system, the consensus was to use XFS
for the video storage.
