On 02/12/2011 10:40, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
Olivier Hallot wrote on 2011-12-01 20:50:
I also would like to say that I am OK to offer our resources, time and
knowledge to projects we are benefiting from (e.g.AskBot). But not to
host any project that call for the same resources if we
Hi Florian, *,
Am 09.12.2011 12:07 schrieb Florian Effenberger:
I like your idea to use the website list however, since people there are
usually much experienced in using technology and e-mail.
So, what do others think about that? Disabling reply-to mangling (after
announcement) on the
Hi Michael, *,
Am 06.12.2011 09:40 schrieb Michael Meeks:
[..]
Anyways, which lists would you like to start trying it on?
The one I'd like to interact with from time to time don't is the
website list :-) but I'd expect the same noise there ...
Hi all
Is the PDF Import extension owned by Oracle?
I am looking for the extension as a separate download but can't find it
anywhere. It is not in the LO Extension repository either.
I have a copy of the old Oracle PDF Import 1.0.4 extension but that doesn't
work with the current LOdev (in fact
I agree with you. do you want to start a new thread on this topic ?
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 14:50:18 -0300 Pedro lt;pedl...@gmail.comgt; wrote
Hi all
Is the PDF Import extension owned by Oracle?
I am looking for the extension as a separate download but can't find it
anywhere. It
Alexandre Silveira-3 wrote
I agree with you. do you want to start a new thread on this topic ?
Start where? A new thread? I don't want to waste people's time... If this
was discussed before, what was the conclusion? I searched Nabble before
posting and couldn't find an answer...
--
Pedro
Because a specific is ignoring major users requests, wich is not a minority
group. This is not a waste of time. And by the way LibreOffice is not a
personal toy of a little group.
Its seems some people are thinking that... unfortunely...
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 16:02:46 -0300 Pedro
Hi Italo, all
I do not remember any discussion about dropping PDF Import, so I assume
that the development will continue and the extension will be bundled
with LibreOffice 3.5 (as with the previous versions).
So if development continues, I suppose it means that Oracle doesn't
own it, right?
Many resources located in extensions,have been discontinued in recent
migrations. You have to call all old developers of OpenOffice to make all key
updates for the new LibreOffice licenses.
This is not happening and is a key point. There is no legal problems if that
developers works for Apache
On 11/12/2011 23:08, Pedro wrote:
So if development continues, I suppose it means that Oracle doesn't
own it, right?
I was confused because 5 of the extensions installed with LO
(including PDF Import) still say Oracle.
We use the last GPL licensed version, which is - and will always be -
On 11/12/2011 23:11, Alexandre Silveira wrote:
Many resources located in extensions have been discontinued in recent
migrations. You have to call all old developers of OpenOffice to make
all key updates for the new LibreOffice licenses.
Extensions developers have been invited to load their
11 matches
Mail list logo
