Re: [tdf-discuss] Triple licensing?

2011-06-15 Thread Sam Ruby
ributor grants to the ASF has all necessary rights (within their ability to do so) to distribute this Work. > Thanks, > Sigrid - Sam Ruby -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice

2011-06-15 Thread Sam Ruby
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Simon Phipps wrote: > May I suggest we "call time"[1] on this discussion please? +1 > S. > > [1] http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Time%20Gentlemen%20Please - Sam Ruby -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@

Re: [tdf-discuss] Interesting observation wrt donations

2011-06-06 Thread Sam Ruby
the ongoing support! EXCELLENT! - Sam Ruby -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this lis

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice

2011-06-05 Thread Sam Ruby
g06542.html I will also note that these options are not mutually exclusive. There could be a small core of close cooperation and a large amount of code which could be the basis for the relicensing aspirations that I have heard expressed numereous times on this list. > S. - Sam Ruby

Re: RE : Re: [tdf-discuss] RE: Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice

2011-06-05 Thread Sam Ruby
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Simon Phipps wrote: > > On 4 Jun 2011, at 19:06, Sam Ruby wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Ian Lynch wrote: >>> >>> I should think there is probably >>> broader commercial or legal reason for Oracle to hold

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice

2011-06-05 Thread Sam Ruby
iberal license: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/%3CBANLkTinXGRe96cJLB5B9m0HsEFYJo=h...@mail.gmail.com%3E As long as there are people open to this possibility, I intend to continue to participate in the discussion. - Sam Ruby -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-m

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice

2011-06-05 Thread Sam Ruby
elf of constraints made by historical choices. AGPLv3 and MPL are both possibilities, as well as a number of others Ian Lynch described the best case here: http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss@documentfoundation.org/msg06533.html - Sam Ruby -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to dis

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice

2011-06-05 Thread Sam Ruby
;t required to contribute anything further, related or unrelated to this original patch. Ever. - Sam Ruby -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoun

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: RE : Re: RE: Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice

2011-06-04 Thread Sam Ruby
grant with a specific list of source files. > It's not even clear whether it will be the current codebase or some > older version IBM is basing their version on. It is the codebase on openoffice.org. The intent is to move the full version history. The mechanics of this have

Re: RE : Re: [tdf-discuss] RE: Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice

2011-06-04 Thread Sam Ruby
over time as people make contributions based on the terms specified in the Individual Contributor License Agreement and in the Apache License, Version 2.0 itself. - Sam Ruby -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfo