On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
So back to the constructive point: what are the best, most uniting proposals
we can come up with for ASF and LibreOffice to co-operate?
I've outlined two here:
On 6/5/11 6:14 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
It is, agreed. Maybe I am just somewhat of an optimist
that I believe even pure idealogical stakeholders can find
common ground and that nothing is inevitable.
Hi Jim, I have posted a message on the general@incubator mailing list,
but I haven't seen it
On 5 June 2011 17:15, Sam Ruby ru...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
So back to the constructive point: what are the best, most uniting
proposals we can come up with for ASF and LibreOffice to co-operate?
I've outlined two here:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 June 2011 14:10, todd rme toddrme2...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think you mean the same thing when you say symmetric as the
people here mean. As far as I can see, you are talking about the
ability to use the code being
sorry, please disregard this. I got the subject messed up somehow
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:01 PM, todd rme toddrme2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 June 2011 14:10, todd rme toddrme2...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think you mean the
On Jun 5, 2011, at 12:48 PM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
I'm first and foremost an end user, so I'm not concerned about the license as
far this doesn't allow corporations like IBM to keep their predatory attitude
vs end users.
So, my stance for copyleft is very practical: proprietary software
I have been involved with OpenOffice.org since 1.1 or so, before .odf. I am
glad that Apache Foundation will have control of the code. For me
personally, the ownership of the code never caused a problem. I had good
experiences with all the Sun employees with whom I got to interact when we
moved
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
* I find it extremely arrogant and insulting for a project that hasn't even
built anything yet to self-proclaim itself as 'upstream'.
What project is that please? I am confused.
thanks
mike
--
Unsubscribe
Hi!
If I understand correctly:
What is developed by the Apache license can be used at LibreOffice but
what is done by LibreOffice can not be used by OpenOffice as OpenOffice
would move to offer the principles of under the GPL.
Thus, the suggestion would be to join efforts to OpenOffice under the
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2011, 01:30 -0600 schrieb Tor Lillqvist:
So here is my suggestion: I propose the everyone here head over to the
Apache Incubator and join the proposal as an initial member.
Well, at least for me the problem is:
I *work* on LibreOffice.
although I am not a
Michael Münch ha scritto:
So for me to join the proposal feels like becoming one of the worst paid
IBM employees.
BTW, there would be some concerns about what kind of community will be
the new Apache OpenOffice one too. At least, I have them.
A development community, as I suppose, or a end
Make a new license agreement for openoffice? With other contributing companies.
Laurence
On 05/06/2011, at 8:41, Christian Lohmaier
lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Allen, *,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Allen Pulsifer pulsi...@openoffice.org
wrote:
[...]
I don't know
Man, how I love fullquotes :-/
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Laurence Jeloudev ljelou...@gmail.com wrote:
Make a new license agreement for openoffice? With other contributing
companies.
Sorry, but what is your point?
my point was that it is in my opionon a stupid idea for LO people to
sign
On Jun 4, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Man, how I love fullquotes :-/
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Laurence Jeloudev ljelou...@gmail.com wrote:
Make a new license agreement for openoffice? With other contributing
companies.
Sorry, but what is your point?
my point was
So oracle won't make new licensing agreements with any one else except
apache which could see no contribution to the project unless your part
of ASF.
Laurence
On 05/06/2011, at 10:11, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Jun 4, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Man, how I
The ASF accepts contributions from anyone. You don't have to
be part of the ASF to contribute. The ASF is a meritocracy,
and so the more you do, the more you *can* do, and providing
bug fixes, patches, documentation, translations are all
welcome and needed contributions (as with all FOSS
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 01:35:46AM +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Only Oracle could add another license to the mix, but if everyone
subscribes to the apache-proposal, and thus shows their support for
the apache
201 - 217 of 217 matches
Mail list logo
