I've been out of the loop on the list here for a little while, and I've
recently thrown on the latest SVN JQuery. Running into some odd problems.
I've got something like the following:
$(.edit).click(function(){
$(body).append(div id='overlay'/diviframe id='edit'
However when I change..
$(#overlay).top(window.pageYOffset + 'px');
to
$(#overlay).height(window.pageYOffset + 'px');
The jQuery part of the code is correct, however I'm not following your
logic here. What happens if you set the .height() to something like
.height( 500px ) - does that work
In IE or not in IE, I think that essential calculations in rotator.js
referencing to document.body should be performed on $(document).ready - this
is what this function is for. After implementing this change and making
necessary adjustments, there is no problem with IE more.
With simpler
John Resig schrieb:
Klaus,
Good news! Any chance that the slide bug I mentioned two times will be
fixed until then? This is the only thing that holds me back from
switching to 1.0. You can see it here:
http://stilbuero.de/jquery/tabs/ (see the slide example - the height is
somehow
BTW. Pluton should be definitely removed.
What's so bad about Pluto? ;-)
/k
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Op 25-aug-2006, om 11:26 heeft Klaus Hartl het volgende geschreven:
BTW. Pluton should be definitely removed.
What's so bad about Pluto? ;-)
Yesterday scientists agreed about the fact that Pluto shouldn't be
called 'Pluto' anymore, but 'Dwarf' from now on. The name is choosen
because
Hi,
I just spotted in Revision 226, that jQuery will not by all means
support XHTML as XML.
Line 743 reads:
if ( table this.nodeName == TABLE a[0].nodeName != THEAD ) {
nodeName in XML preserves case, that means in XHTML as XML it would
return table and thead so that doesn't work here.
Yesterday scientists agreed about the fact that Pluto
shouldn't be called 'Pluto' anymore, but 'Dwarf' from now on.
The name is choosen because it's the smallest (discovered)
planet in the universe, and a so called 'dwarf'-planet..
Not true!
Yes, Pluto is now classified as a dwarf planet
Good news! Any chance that the slide bug I mentioned two times will be
fixed until then? This is the only thing that holds me back from
switching to 1.0. You can see it here:
http://stilbuero.de/jquery/tabs/ (see the slide example - the height is
somehow miscalculated...)
Or maybe I'm
On Fri, August 25, 2006 7:18 am, Klaus Hartl said:
Hi,
I just spotted in Revision 226, that jQuery will not by all means
support XHTML as XML.
Line 743 reads:
if ( table this.nodeName == TABLE a[0].nodeName != THEAD ) {
nodeName in XML preserves case, that means in XHTML as XML it
Hi,
with revision 226 Firefox throws an error 'elem has no properties' if I
use the following snippet:
$('#someIdul').size() or
$('#someIdul')[0]
if element #someId does not contain a ul.
Can someone second this?
Regards, Klaus
___
jQuery mailing
One quick thing about your demo page - you have some PHP at the top of
your jquery.js file which causes issues in Opera, etc.
Ups, I copied that from another project... fixed.
I'll see if I can get a demo up of my page, that works, without that
particular change.
Thanks for your efforts!
Can't wait!
!//--
andy matthews
web developer
certified advanced coldfusion programmer
ICGLink, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
615.370.1530 x737
--//-
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of John Resig
Sent: Friday,
I think they should call it Plutito.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Does anyone remember those 790x90 pixel banners on CNET that would expand vertically to display a big version of the banner. This would occur the first time the user accessed the page. Then, after a few seconds, then banner would contract into a regular 790x90 pixel banner.
The user would have the
Aren't
those usually done in Flash?
!//--andy matthewsweb
developercertified advanced coldfusion programmerICGLink,
Inc.[EMAIL PROTECTED]615.370.1530
x737--//-
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf
Hi all, Any idea why the compressed version (jquery.pack.js) of the latest SVN (228) doesn't work in Safari? Compare these two pages in Safari:http://sandbox.englishrules.com/index.htm - pointing to uncompressed, "lite" jquery .http://sandbox.englishrules.com/pack.htm - pointing to compressed
I found out how to do the iframe inside ouside inter-access. And I wrote some test code in the traditional js way(tested with IE, Firefox). I've tried to write these code using jquery, but not success yet. the main page code
1html
2head
3
titleMAIN/title
4
Try:
$(main,xml).html()
instead of:
$(main,xml).text()
On 8/25/06, Sam Sherlock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the dynamic xml source creates a structure along the following linescontent titlemy title/title
main pabout/p /main script /script/contentthe jquery code that I am using to take load the
John Resig wrote:
You caught me in the middle of some updates, so it's now in rev 226,
slightly modified to be more generic:
http://jquery.com/src/jquery-svn.js
var np = p.replace(/\-(\w)/g,function(m,c){return c.toUpperCase()});
r = e.currentStyle[p] || e.currentStyle[np];
In your
Hi folks,
please have a look at this bug report and John' reply:
http://proj.jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/133/
To fix the problem in my example with Firefox
(http://fuzz.bassistance.de/slidebug/starterkit.html), what do I have to
change?
I don't quite get the explanation John provided...
-- Jörn
.text works if you put the HTML in cdata.though I have some odd display issues, or am I still going wrong??On 8/26/06, Sam Sherlock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I have tried that but no joy, when I dump the mark up to the console
var newContent = ;...console.info(' main from xml source: ' +
Sam -
Try doing this:
$(main,xml).children().appendTo(#main);
or this:
$(#main).append( $(main,xml).children() );
I think they may get you the effect that you desire. This is with the
(soon to be) jQuery 1.0:
http://jquery.com/src/jquery-svn.js
--John
On 8/25/06, Sam Sherlock [EMAIL
On 8/25/06, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Solution 1) Don't include a width on the outer box.
Solution 2) Provide a static width for the inner dds. Something like:
dd { width: 250px; }
Out of curiosity I tried these out, they do indeed seem to fix the
problem. Uploaded them just for
I'd like to take this opportunity to announce the brand new jQuery
1.0! A lot of work has gone into this release. A lot of bugs fixed, a
ton of new features, and a complete overhaul of how the jQuery
development process is run.
In reality, this release is so large, it's going to take a couple
25 matches
Mail list logo
