Yes... VERY interested!
Cheers
Joel.
On 02/11/2006, at 6:40 AM, Wil Stuckey wrote:
> On 10/31/06, Sam Sherlock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> UFO Version 3.30 is coming soon sneek peak at http://www.refunk.com/
> ufo/ufo.js
>
> I'm actually working on a jQuery port of UFO 3.x
>
> I've got a worki
Ooh.. me want jquery port of UFO 3.x.. thank you :)[g]On 11/2/06, Wil Stuckey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:On 10/31/06, Sam Sherlock <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
UFO Version 3.30 is coming soon sneek peak at http://www.refunk.com/ufo/ufo.js
I'm actually working on a jQuery port of UFO
3.xI've got a
On 10/31/06, Sam Sherlock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
UFO Version 3.30 is coming soon sneek peak at http://www.refunk.com/ufo/ufo.jsI'm actually working on a jQuery port of UFO
3.xI've got a working port of UFO 2.0 sans a few features that we did not need here. I would be willing to post it if any
UFO Version 3.30 is coming soon sneek peak at http://www.refunk.com/ufo/ufo.js
On 31/10/06, Luke Lutman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You make a good point about mobile devices, etc. Klaus -- point taken.I'm still not convinced about using though -- for me it's gota number of cons:* It's messy -- y
You make a good point about mobile devices, etc. Klaus -- point taken.
I'm still not convinced about using though -- for me it's got
a number of cons:
* It's messy -- you need different code for different browsers. All the
browsers support , but IE wants a different than
the rest.
* It does
Luke Lutman schrieb:
> This probably won't be a popular opinion, but fwiw ...
>
> Although the W3C would like us all to stick our heads in the sand and
> pretend doesn't exist, it is (imho) the way to go -- it's a de
> facto standard. , by itself, works with all the browsers on
> jQuery's supp
This probably won't be a popular opinion, but fwiw ...
Although the W3C would like us all to stick our heads in the sand and
pretend doesn't exist, it is (imho) the way to go -- it's a de
facto standard. , by itself, works with all the browsers on
jQuery's support list (it even works with expr
I have given up on embeds and objects directly in the html.
flash always works. if they don't have the
software, the browser will assist these folks or allow them to
download the file.
jquery can catch these requests and convert them into a pleasant
/ and permit control over it!
heheh ok then.. thanks again!On 10/31/06, Matt Stith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well for one, you wouldnt have to keep emailing us. :)I wouldnt recommend using the approch you were using (window[n] = depricated i belive), Im not sure what else you could try, but im sure a little research could help
Well for one, you wouldnt have to keep emailing us. :)I wouldnt recommend using the approch you were using (window[n] = depricated i belive), Im not sure what else you could try, but im sure a little research could help. jQuery takes a relatively long time to find elements compared to using native
does it really? hmmm.. can you list any other advantages? thanks!On 10/31/06, Matt Stith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:Because it would be easier/faster not to.
On 10/30/06, Guntur N. Sarwohadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Why do you want to use jQuery for this?
Why not? :)
_
Because it would be easier/faster not to.On 10/30/06, Guntur N. Sarwohadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why do you want to use jQuery for this?
Why not? :)
___jQuery mailing listdiscuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Why do you want to use jQuery for this?
Why not? :)
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
The nested object/embed tag is because some browsers recognize the object tag, and others the embed tag. But the browsers will ignore the tag they don't support. Your $("object#flashobject>embed") code is only selecting the embed tag, not the object tag. Which means will only work in the browsers t
I use different IDs for object and embed, like this:
function getFlashID(id) {
var flash = null;
flash = document.getElementById(id + "E");
if (flash == null) {
flash = document.getElementById(id + "O");
}
return(flash);
}
$(getFlashID("flashmovie")).do_something_w
Guntur N. Sarwohadi schrieb:
> but I'd would like not to use object embed tags as they are just
> messy.
>
>
> Hmm.. yeah... the nested object embed was generated by flash. It was an
> attempt to make the flash object work on most browsers.. hmm.. if this
> is a bad way to do things..
found this article... maybe this might light things up:http://www.ambience.sk/flash-valid.htmand
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/flashsatay/so i guess to make things valid.. no longer use embed :)On 10/31/06, Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:You want both... it's just you have to figure which one
You want both... it's just you have to figure which one to control!
I did a lot of ... .. stuff, and most
browsers seem to like the embed. hmm! (I don't use IE)
On 10/30/06, Guntur N. Sarwohadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > but I'd would like not to use object embed tags as they are just m
but I'd would like not to use object embed tags as they are just messy.
Hmm.. yeah... the nested object embed was generated by flash. It was an attempt to make the flash object work on most browsers.. hmm.. if this is a bad way to do things.. i'll have to find a better way.. or does anyone know th
I have tried with limited success to get JSFC & UFO to work, I have jQuery doing other things and I would ideally like to get jQuery & UFO to handle it all,JSFC was last updated in 2003. It works with both object and embed tags.
http://www.abdulqabiz.com/files/JSFC/JSFCommunicator%20Library.htmI
it may work... but... object & embed are used separately ... some
browsers may use the object and other will use the embed. but not
both... your solution ignores the object tag. and just works on the
embed.
And in the crazy case of multiple nested objects... you will have to
each() through the ta
Hah.. found the solution..to access the flashobject using these combination of tags:
...and to access with jquery, use this:var oFlash = $("object#flashobject>embed");
and as long as f.swf has a method registered with ExternalInterface (ie. fmethod), then you can call it easily by:oFlash.fmethod()t
ok,..this is how i access the flash object://function to capture flashgetFlashMovie = function(n) { if(isIE) { return window[n]; } else { return document[n]; }
}//implementation:var oFlash = getFlashMovie("someflashmovie");//call flash ExternalInterface registered method:oFla
> Does anyone know how to access a flash object with jquery? I have a flash
> movie with a function I need to call from js. It already has a function
> registered as externalInterface and Im able to call it using regular js. I
> would like to know how in jquery. I tried doing the regular $(expressi
Does anyone know how to access a flash object with jquery? I have a flash movie with a function I need to call from js. It already has a function registered as externalInterface and Im able to call it using regular js. I would like to know how in jquery. I tried doing the regular $(_expression_) bu
25 matches
Mail list logo
