On Nov 23, 2006, at 21:43 , Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
> Barry Nauta schrieb:
>> Several statements in two small paragraphs.
>> Am I right by making these statements? If this is true, the answer
>> lies in
>> scoping: small (whatever is meant with this) applications: use a
>> scripting
>> approach
Barry Nauta schrieb:
> Several statements in two small paragraphs.
> Am I right by making these statements? If this is true, the answer lies in
> scoping: small (whatever is meant with this) applications: use a scripting
> approach, optionally connecting to a backend written in another langauge.
Wow, thanks all for the reactions! This post is a reply to some of the
comments.
On Thursday 23 November 2006 00:11, David wrote:
> Other articles also suggest php is becoming a front-end language for
> java. So why don't you beat them to the punch :)
This is a solution that is worth an invest
We are a group of 5 engineers team happily using Python/Django [1]
and jQuery to build a Web 2.0 site.
We started to learn and use Django at the end of 2005, after a brief
learning and comparison of Django, Ruby on Rails and CakePHP. Given
our previous Python background, the decision wasn't
Barry Nauta schreef:
> We currently develop everything in Java (including webapps),
> Of course, I am also interested in language characteristics. I know PHP
> pretty
> well, but the other languages are, from a technical point of view, unknown to
> me.
>
Maybe you can do something with this
> Our company is looking for a way for 'quick' web-development.
> Small webapps consisting of a few webpages with some minimal
> database interaction.
>
> We currently develop everything in Java (including webapps),
> but I find the whole cycle of developing, compiling (java
> class files, EJB
Project help like a CF JQuery wrapper ya?
Cheers
2006/11/22, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Nope I didn't know that but for sure, everyone is welcome to the
ColdFusion team!
I'm jotting all of these names down for future reference and project help!
Rey...
Christopher Jordan wrote:
> Rey, di
Nope I didn't know that but for sure, everyone is welcome to the
ColdFusion team!
I'm jotting all of these names down for future reference and project help!
Rey...
Christopher Jordan wrote:
> Rey, did you realize you had a team? That's sweet! Can I be on it? :o)
>
> Chris
>
> Rey Bango wrote:
> Without making a choice for any language, I am looking for arguments why a
> dynamic scripting language in general would be better.
> Of course, I am also interested in language characteristics. I know PHP
> pretty
> well, but the other languages are, from a technical point of view, unknown
Rey, did you realize you had a team? That's sweet! Can I be on it? :o)
Chris
Rey Bango wrote:
:) Sweet! Yep, CF is extremely powerful.
Web Specialist wrote:
I'm with Rey Bango team: ColdFusion is a great alternative.
___
jQuery mailing li
Barry,
Given your current development environment, I'd strongly suggest
ColdFusion (or BlueDragon). Here are my reasons:
- ColdFusion (and BD *I think*) is written entirely in Java. ColdFusion
give you the ability to seamlessly access Java objects. In this way you
could leverage any custom b
As others have mentioned Ruby on Rails is pretty amazing but I would
like to point out Python. I have yet to use any of the frameworks but
I've been reading up on Python in my spare time and I really like it
(even better than Ruby ... but that is just how my brain works). I
hope to experiment with
:) Sweet! Yep, CF is extremely powerful.
Web Specialist wrote:
> I'm with Rey Bango team: ColdFusion is a great alternative.
>
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Hi Sam,
As was mentioned, there are a ton of ColdFusion hosting options
available. Perhaps not as pervasive as PHP or ASP but certainly abundant
and definitely reputable & stable.
As for not being able to run it for free, thats a bad misconception. You
can definitely run it locally for free. I
Hi Sam,
> So if the trial version fully functional with no time limits for local
> development?
Nope no limits other than your limited to local IP connections.
> You need a registration to download the trial, so I can't see what you
> get with the trial and what happens when it ends. When I see
On 22/11/06, Web Specialist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sam
>
> I'll disagree. CF is a powerful and free option for localhost development
> acessed by localhost and more 2 machines. Only hosting is paid(GoDaddy.com
> haves a plan by US$7,95).
>
> Running under Java make CF yet more powerful and ea
If you're looking for rapid development, then look no further than
Coldfusion.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Barry Nauta
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 11:03 AM
To: discuss@jquery.com
Subject: [jQuery] Off topic: which progra
Sam
I'll disagree. CF is a powerful and free option for localhost development
acessed by localhost and more 2 machines. Only hosting is
paid(GoDaddy.comhaves a plan by US$7,95).
Running under Java make CF yet more powerful and easy to learn.
Cheers.
2006/11/22, Sam Collett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I too would recommend Ruby on Rails. It's a very powerful full stack
framework and pretty easy to get a hang off (even if you don't know
ruby). If you really want to program PHP (I did this until a year ago,
but try to avoid it as much as possible now), you could have a look at
the Rails-like CakeP
On 22/11/06, Web Specialist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm with Rey Bango team: ColdFusion is a great alternative.
The syntax certainly is easy to understand if you are comfortable with
html. Finding hosts that support it may be more difficult, plus you
can't run it for free (in a non-trial way)
On 22/11/06, Barry Nauta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To all,
>
> First of all: apologies for this non-jquery related question, but since there
> are many experts in web-development on this list, I dare to ask it anyway.
>
> Our company is looking for a way for 'quick' web-development. Small webapp
I'm with Rey Bango team: ColdFusion is a great alternative.
2006/11/22, "Jörn Zaefferer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> First of all: apologies for this non-jquery related question, but since
> there are many experts in web-development on this list, I dare to ask it
anyway.
>
> Our company is looking
> First of all: apologies for this non-jquery related question, but since
> there are many experts in web-development on this list, I dare to ask it
> anyway.
>
> Our company is looking for a way for 'quick' web-development. Small
> webapps consisting of a few webpages with some minimal database
To all,
First of all: apologies for this non-jquery related question, but since there
are many experts in web-development on this list, I dare to ask it anyway.
Our company is looking for a way for 'quick' web-development. Small webapps
consisting of a few webpages with some minimal database in
24 matches
Mail list logo
