Christof Donat wrote:
In another thread
(getScript error), we were discussing alternatives because it seems not
to
work as expected, at least for a delay of 0 milliseconds.
Are you talking about this thread?
Hi,
The thread I was referring to is this one:
http://www.nabble.com/getScript-error-tf2652417.html
OK, It leads to the same solution. I simply added this to my code:
if( ! window.execScript )
window.execScript= function(src) { eval.call(window,src); };
One of my last messages
Hi,
In another thread
(getScript error), we were discussing alternatives because it seems not to
work as expected, at least for a delay of 0 milliseconds.
Are you talking about this thread?
http://www.nabble.com/eval.call(-window,jscode)-does-not-work-in-IE-tf2202851.html#a6099563
The
Hi,
I've looked at your package.js, and I've found that you use the
setTimeout method for evaluating the loaded script in the global scope,
with a delay of 1 millisecond. Don't you have any problems with that?
No, I have not experienced any problems with that up to now. I guess, that it
Some days ago I wrote this getScripts plugin, as a macro for shrinking this
$.getScript( f1.js, function() {
$.getScript( f2.js, function() {
$.getScript( f3.js, function() {
do_it();
} );
} );
} );
to this
$.getScripts( [
To restore tabs, see this message from
http://www.nabble.com/Working-on-a-getScripts-plugin-tf2696465.html
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Working-on-a-getScripts-plugin-tf2696465.html#a7519622
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Christof Donat wrote:
You can have that a lot cheaper. How about this:
jQuery.getScripts = function(scripts,callback) {
if( scripts.length == 0 ) {
callback();
return;
}
jQuery.getScript(scripts[0],function() {
Hi,
But I don't understand the drawback. If the loaded scripts are evaluated as
soon as they are loaded, before calling the callback in $.getScript AFAIK,
there should be no problem, except that getScript does not support library
registration, so there is a risk for looping indefinitely.
Christof Donat wrote:
$.getScript() is assynchonous. That means, that it returns before the
script
is loaded.
Yes, but if I put all my code into the callback?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Working-on-a-getScripts-plugin-tf2696465.html#a7524534
Sent from the
Hi,
$.getScript() is assynchonous. That means, that it returns before the
script is loaded.
Yes, but if I put all my code into the callback?
That does not help, if your loaded script needs to load another script.
Christof
___
jQuery mailing
Christof Donat wrote:
That does not help, if your loaded script needs to load another script.
For example:
file a.js is [ $.getScript( b.js, function() { doA(); } ); ]
file b.js is [ $.getScript( c.js, function() { doB(); } ); ]
file c.js is [ doC(); ]
the page has: [ script src=jquery.js
Hi,
That does not help, if your loaded script needs to load another script.
For example:
file a.js is [ $.getScript( b.js, function() { doA(); } ); ]
file b.js is [ $.getScript( c.js, function() { doB(); } ); ]
file c.js is [ doC(); ]
the page has: [ script src=jquery.js - script
Christof Donat wrote:
No, the order could be doA() doC() doB(). That is because doA() is called
as
soon as b.js is loaded but before c.js is loaded. The call to
$.getScript()
in b.js returns immediatelly and loads c.js assynchonously. Then b.js is
finished and doA() is called while
Hi,
No, the order could be doA() doC() doB(). That is because doA() is called
as
soon as b.js is loaded but before c.js is loaded. The call to
$.getScript()
in b.js returns immediatelly and loads c.js assynchonously. Then b.js is
finished and doA() is called while c.js is still
Christof Donat wrote:
No. In your example b.js is completelly evaluated before the doA() is
called,
but that only means, that the download of c.js has been started. As soon
as
that has finished, doB() is called, but that can be after doA() has been
called.
$.getScript() initiates
Hi,
An alternative could be to inspect any loaded script and see if it requires
more scripts (recursively).
I think that that would be too complicated. In jsPax I simpy expect the
scripts to generate a specific Object which depends on the name of the
script. If that object exists after the
Christof Donat wrote:
I don't use jQuery in jsPax, because I load jQuery as a jsPax-package
It's just what I'm interested in. An independent script to add to a page and
have it load what is needed: nice shot Christof!
I've looked at your package.js, and I've found that you use the
17 matches
Mail list logo
