Re: [jQuery] jQuery and Prototype

2006-10-07 Thread Jörn Zaefferer
Jan Rosa schrieb: > Hello, > I think there i no need to replace $ in next release. You can employ > server search&replace > > Look at example: > http://www.freshconcept.cz/uschovna/jQueryIsolate.phps > > then you use: > > src="...pathto/jQueryIsolate.php?js=jquery-latest.js,pause.js,hovertip.js">

Re: [jQuery] jQuery and Prototype

2006-10-07 Thread Jan Rosa
Hello, I think there i no need to replace $ in next release. You can employ server search&replace Look at example: http://www.freshconcept.cz/uschovna/jQueryIsolate.phps then you use: Jan Rosa ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jq

Re: [jQuery] jQuery and Prototype

2006-10-06 Thread Klaus Hartl
Klaus Hartl schrieb: > > Mike Alsup schrieb: >> I agree completely. I'll update my plugins today. >> >> Mike > > Me too! Ok, maybe not today, but then tomorrow :-) Thank you Jörn! :-) -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jq

Re: [jQuery] jQuery and Prototype

2006-10-06 Thread Laurent Yaish
Awesome! Thanks guys. Laurent On 10/6/06, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Brandon. Thats what I wanted to understand. > > Rey... > > Brandon Aaron wrote: > > Removing the alias throughout the core and the plugins will make it > > easier for those who need to integrate with Atlas and

Re: [jQuery] jQuery and Prototype

2006-10-06 Thread Rey Bango
Thanks Brandon. Thats what I wanted to understand. Rey... Brandon Aaron wrote: > Removing the alias throughout the core and the plugins will make it > easier for those who need to integrate with Atlas and prototype. Just > making it a one line fix to change the alias to something else. The > '$'

Re: [jQuery] jQuery and Prototype

2006-10-06 Thread Klaus Hartl
Mike Alsup schrieb: > I agree completely. I'll update my plugins today. > > Mike Me too! Ok, maybe not today, but then tomorrow :-) -- Klaus ___ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/

Re: [jQuery] jQuery and Prototype

2006-10-06 Thread Brandon Aaron
Removing the alias throughout the core and the plugins will make it easier for those who need to integrate with Atlas and prototype. Just making it a one line fix to change the alias to something else. The '$' would stay the default alias. This will have no impact on normal development and provide

Re: [jQuery] jQuery and Prototype

2006-10-06 Thread John Resig
> I think 'jQuery(...)' should still be used internally and by plugin > authors for the foreseeable future. If file size is an issue, the code > could always be compressed/packed. Yep, totally agree - the internal uses of $() instead of jQuery() are definitely a mistake - just me lapsing back into

Re: [jQuery] jQuery and Prototype

2006-10-06 Thread Mike Alsup
I agree completely. I'll update my plugins today. Mike > > I think 'jQuery(...)' should still be used internally and by plugin > authors for the foreseeable future. If file size is an issue, the code > could always be compressed/packed. > > I would say keep $ as the alias. If there are conflicts

Re: [jQuery] jQuery and Prototype

2006-10-06 Thread Sam Collett
On 06/10/06, Laurent Yaish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What I'm trying to say is that using the $ alias by default is fine. > And just having to change the '$ = jQuery' line to use another alias > is okay with me, except that the $ alias was being used in the jQuery > code itself, so I had to sear

Re: [jQuery] jQuery and Prototype

2006-10-06 Thread Rey Bango
Hi Laurent, I was actually replying to Brandon re: his suggestion. I wanted to get a better understanding from him on the change he suggested and how that would impact normal, non-plugin development. Rey... Laurent Yaish wrote: > What I'm trying to say is that using the $ alias by default is f

Re: [jQuery] jQuery and Prototype

2006-10-06 Thread Laurent Yaish
What I'm trying to say is that using the $ alias by default is fine. And just having to change the '$ = jQuery' line to use another alias is okay with me, except that the $ alias was being used in the jQuery code itself, so I had to search and replace it everywhere. The jQuery code (and plugins) sh

Re: [jQuery] jQuery and Prototype

2006-10-06 Thread Rey Bango
So you think JQuery should change the $ to another identifier or you feel JQuery should implement namespaces? If its the latter, I'm not keen on that. I like the shorter code approach the JQuery and Prototype use but if there's a way to keep that (eg: JQ()), then I'd go for something like that.

Re: [jQuery] jQuery and Prototype

2006-10-06 Thread Laurent Yaish
; > On 10/6/06, "Jörn Zaefferer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Original-Nachricht > > > Datum: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 08:12:51 -0700 > > > Von: "Laurent Yaish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > An: discuss@

Re: [jQuery] jQuery and Prototype

2006-10-06 Thread Brandon Aaron
--- Original-Nachricht > > Datum: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 08:12:51 -0700 > > Von: "Laurent Yaish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > An: discuss@jquery.com > > Betreff: [jQuery] jQuery and Prototype > > > > > Hi Folks, > > > > > > F

Re: [jQuery] jQuery and Prototype

2006-10-06 Thread Laurent Yaish
700 > Von: "Laurent Yaish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: discuss@jquery.com > Betreff: [jQuery] jQuery and Prototype > > > Hi Folks, > > > > First of all thank you John for writing jQuery. I've read the wiki page > > regarding using jQuery and p

Re: [jQuery] jQuery and Prototype

2006-10-06 Thread Jörn Zaefferer
Original-Nachricht Datum: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 08:12:51 -0700 Von: "Laurent Yaish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: discuss@jquery.com Betreff: [jQuery] jQuery and Prototype > Hi Folks, > > First of all thank you John for writing jQuery. I've read the wiki pag

[jQuery] jQuery and Prototype

2006-10-06 Thread Laurent Yaish
Hi Folks, First of all thank you John for writing jQuery. I've read the wiki page regarding using jQuery and prototype together and couldn't get it to work reliably. I did load prototype first but ended up going through the jQuery source code and renamed $() to JQ(). It would be kind of cool if th