thanks Aaron, Michael! that makes it clear.
On 1/16/07, Michael Geary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Now that it is laid out in front of me it's pretty obvious,
> > but when you come into the thing cold, these things are not
> > obvious. I think it would be a good idea to explicitly state
> > what
> Now that it is laid out in front of me it's pretty obvious,
> but when you come into the thing cold, these things are not
> obvious. I think it would be a good idea to explicitly state
> what the object is, and that $ refers to it (I think that's
> right ... now I mention it I'm not quite sur
On 16/01/07, Daniel McBrearty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yes. Thanks. I have it now.
>
> Any takers on my "what is the jQuery object" question? Is it simply an
> array of elements that have been selected?
>
> It may be kind of obvious, but it took me a few days to figure it. It
> might be good to
The jQuery object is a chunk of the DOM, on steroids.
--Erik
On 1/16/07, Daniel McBrearty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
yes. Thanks. I have it now.
Any takers on my "what is the jQuery object" question? Is it simply an
array of elements that have been selected?
It may be kind of obvious, but it
yes. Thanks. I have it now.
Any takers on my "what is the jQuery object" question? Is it simply an
array of elements that have been selected?
It may be kind of obvious, but it took me a few days to figure it. It
might be good to explicitly say this somewhere early in the docs IMHO.
thanks again.
> $(function () {
>self.focus();
>$("#userresponse").setAttribute("autocomplete","off");
>$("#userresponse").focus();
> });
I would do this:
$(function () {
self.focus();
$("#userresponse").attr("autocomplete","off")[0].focus();
});
There isn't a setAttribut