This is my first post here, long time lurker, first time active.
I am facing a dilemma. After presenting the deliverable for a UX
study of a website, my boss asked me to VISUALLY represent the
reasoning behind the sitemap structure.
The site map is divided into parts, each part explaining why
I was asked to represent VISUALLY the reasoning behind the sitemap.
There is a whole documentation about the full UX study, but the
client does not want to read TEXT, he wants to see a VISUAL
representation of the reasoning of the sitemap. How is that possible?
I am totally lost and clueless and
This might be a good time to use a storyboard or comic representation of key
use scenarios. Those can embody all of the UX research/rationale and also
how that translates into pathways in the site. You could also try site path
diagramming (see Wodtke p. 248 or this PDF
Just a quick post to this, I think most of the way information is
structure comes out of cultural norms or mental models.
If you went to a website, where are you most likely to find the
address. If it were me, I would likely go to the contact section.
So to answer your question, I think,
Dan Zollman wrote:
The CMU page seems to refer to design notebooks rather than
deliverables. The others appear to have a strong focus on layout and
graphic/information design, but they have the same types of content
that I'd put in a design report.
Process was a deliverable within class --
Dashboards are for multiple interpretations of the same data source,
not for multiple data sources interpreted the same way.
Thoughts?
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ...
Hi George,
This request might be more straightforward than you think. Since you
mentioned that you have a UX study that supports your decisions,
there is presumably a rationale that has lead you to organize the
site the way that you did in the site map.
You didn't say what kind of system you
Hi there,
Within my conference team we have been extensively discussing the
disciplines needed in creating successful technology.
After 2 years of pondering, we came up with a framework that includes
Experience Design, Persuasive Technology and Analytics (Evidence Based
Marketing).
Further
