Thanks Dmitry !
Response has been overwhelming - we are all over the news. We have had
over a million page views a day, with over 20,000 contributing members
already !
I would love to hear from the community on the Survey Interactions and
the Give to Get model in general.
We think we
The site is cool, the user generated value stream and networks effects could
really propel the business forward. Just don't let your marketing folks
destroy your vibe and credibility by using buzzwords like disruptive,
long-tail, user generated value stream, Revolutionary, Gestalt, or
anything
Jeff,
Can you talk a little bit more about the 'give to get' model. No doubt its
interesting, but its not uncommon that only ~10-15% contribute in many
online communities and even less do so actively. Isn't attrition going to be
a problem under this model, no matter how fun/ small the surveys
Jeff Gimzek wrote:
I would love to hear from the community on the Survey
Interactions and the Give to Get model in general.
In other communities with the give-to-get mentality, I've seen the
phenomenon of throwaway comments where a new member posts the
bare minimum simply to gain access to
On Jun 12, 2008, at 11:23 AM, Martin wrote:
Hi Jeff,
I was put off becoming a member because I work for a fairly small
company. I figure that it would be pretty easy to identify me by
what I write. And I'm not sure my employer would look too kindly on
that... Maybe the model could be
On Jun 12, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Vishal Iyer wrote:
Jeff,
Can you talk a little bit more about the 'give to get' model. No
doubt its
interesting, but its not uncommon that only ~10-15% contribute in many
online communities and even less do so actively. Isn't attrition
going to be
a problem
I was put off becoming a member because I work for a fairly small
company. I figure that it would be pretty easy to identify me by
definitely an issue - but if you employer is too small, basically, not
indexed by Hoovers, we are giving you access but holding your review
from display. so,
The site is a very cool concept. It does seem to me that anonymity
can be very tough to find for niche positions such as Interaction
Designer. Say a large company has only a few interaction designers at
most. I think it would be very easy to figure out who made the
anonymous review based on
I also like the concept. But following on the theme of trust raised by
Meredith, how can I trust the accuracy of the information provided by people,
some of whom may be solely motivated to put in information just to get access.
Or worse, who are motivated to create an inflated view of the
we have a research staff that is full time on salary and review approval
if it looks bogus, fake, inflated, out of market context, etc. - we
reject it, while the user still gets access
short, useless reviews, or ones that name names are rejected also.
jd
On Jun 12, 2008, at 12:49 PM,
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Jeff Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:.
In other communities with the give-to-get mentality, I've seen the
phenomenon of throwaway comments where a new member posts the
bare minimum simply to gain access to locked features. Is there a
check in place to
Peer ranking is coming for sure - we couldnt do it with this release
on this schedule.
In the meantime - we can tell junk content easily, and we reject it.
On Jun 12, 2008, at 1:00 PM, Sebi Tauciuc wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Jeff Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:.
In
Oh, so you do have cheating mechanisms already. Sounds pretty good!
Personally, I have a very good feeling about this model. It mimics the way
human cooperation works in general (give some to take some combined with
trust) , and systems that mimic the way our mind works just... work.
Yes, there
As you guys may have noticed in the MSM and the blogosphere, the
project I have been doing IA, UX, UE, concepting, wireframing,
interaction design, logo design, naming, branding, graphics, interface
design and more for during the past year went live last night.
So what is it?
sorry guys, we have close to a half million views already and are
bringing more servers online.
sigh.
On Jun 11, 2008, at 10:12 AM, Jeff Gimzek wrote:
As you guys may have noticed in the MSM and the blogosphere, the
project I have been doing IA, UX, UE, concepting, wireframing,
it hit the front pages of TechCrunch, Digg and reditt so thats gonna keep
the views coming
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Jeff Gimzek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry guys, we have close to a half million views already and are bringing
more servers online.
sigh.
On Jun 11, 2008, at
We got over the bugs, and are running well with thousands of pieces of
content.
Apologies to those that couldn't get in before.
jd
- -
Jeffrey D. Gimzek | Senior User Experience Designer
http://www.glassdoor.com
Welcome
17 matches
Mail list logo
